Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Election 08

Obama on the Issues

A look at Barack Obama's environmental platform and record


30 Jul 2007
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Updated 27 Feb 2008

Barack Obama
Barack Obama.
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has earned an 86 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters for his first three years representing Illinois in the U.S. Senate (a lower score than might have been because he's missed some votes while campaigning for president). In the early months of his presidential campaign, enviros were skeptical of Obama's (now heavily qualified) support for coal-to-liquids technology and unvarnished enthusiasm for ethanol in all its forms, but he earned more respect from greens with an October 2007 speech unveiling an aggressive climate and energy plan.

Read an interview with Barack Obama by Grist and Outside.

Key Points


  • Calls for cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Would accomplish this through a cap-and-trade system that would auction off 100 percent of emissions permits, making polluters pay for the CO2 they emit.

  • Would channel revenue raised from auctioning emissions permits -- between $30 billion and $50 billion a year -- toward developing and deploying clean energy technology, creating "green jobs," and helping low-income Americans afford higher energy bills.

  • Calls for 25 percent of U.S. electricity to come from renewable sources by 2025, and for 30 percent of the federal government's electricity to come from renewables by 2020.

  • Proposes investing $150 billion over 10 years in R&D for renewables, biofuels, efficiency, "clean coal," and other clean tech.

  • Calls for improving energy efficiency in the U.S. 50 percent by 2030.

  • Calls for 36 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2022 and 60 billion gallons of biofuels to be used in the U.S. each year by 2030.

  • Calls for all new buildings in the U.S. to be carbon neutral by 2030.

  • Calls for reducing U.S. oil consumption by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels a day, by 2030.

  • Introduced the Health Care for Hybrids Act, which would have the federal government help cover health-care costs for retired U.S. autoworkers in exchange for domestic auto companies investing at least 50 percent of the savings into production of more fuel-efficient vehicles.

  • Supports raising fuel-economy standards for automobiles to 40 miles per gallon and light trucks to 32 mpg by 2020.

  • Supports a phaseout of incandescent light bulbs by 2014.

  • Cosponsor of the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act. After being badgered by MoveOn and other progressives over the issue, he "clarified" his position by saying he would support liquefied coal only if it emitted 20 percent less carbon over its lifecycle than conventional fuels.

Video & Audio


Watch part of Obama's Oct. 8, 2007, energy policy speech in Portsmouth, N.H.:




Watch Obama's May 7, 2007, speech to the Detroit Economic Club, in which he calls on automakers to manufacture more efficient cars:




Watch Obama answer a question about nuclear power at the CNN/YouTube debate on July 23, 2007:




Watch Obama offer a different perspective on nuclear power at an Iowa campaign rally on Dec. 31, 2007:




Listen to Obama's Sept. 20, 2006, speech on energy independence [MP3], part of a MoveOn Progressive Vision Series:


Listen to a clip of Obama's interview with Grist and Outside:



Quotable Quotes


  • "I've put forward one of the most aggressive proposals out there [on climate change], but the science seems to be coming in indicating it's accelerating even more quickly with every passing day. And by the time I take office, I think we're going to have to have a serious conversation about how drastic steps we need to take to address it."
    -- Dec. 4, 2007, during a Democratic debate

  • "We are not acting as good stewards of God's Earth when our bottom line puts the size of our profits before the future of our planet."
  • "Businesses don't own the sky, the public does, and if we want them to stop polluting it, we have to put a price on all pollution. It's time to make the cleaner way of doing business the more profitable way of doing business."
    -- Oct. 8, 2007, in an energy policy speech in Portsmouth, N.H.

  • "Saying that America is addicted to oil without following a real plan for energy independence is like admitting alcoholism and then skipping out on the 12-step program."
    -- April 2, 2006, in a speech at the Associated Press' annual luncheon, referring to President Bush's 2006 State of the Union address

  • "The auto industry is on a path that is unacceptable and unsustainable -- for their business, for their workers, and for America. And America must take action to make it right. ... For too long, we've been either too afraid to ask our automakers to meet higher fuel standards or unwilling to help them do it. But the truth is ... we have to do both. We must demand that they revamp their production, we must assist that transition, and we must make the choice to buy these cars when we have the option."
  • "I think how we treat our animals reflects how we treat each other. And it's very important that we have a president who is mindful of the cruelty that is perpetrated on animals."

Platform & Record In-Depth


  • Opposes oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

  • Believes nuclear power should continue to be a part of the U.S.'s energy mix.

  • Opposes the storage of nuclear waste at the Yucca Mountain repository being built in southern Nevada.

  • Promises to restore environmental protections that the Bush administration rolled back by executive order.

  • Supports country-of-origin labels for food and has also voiced support for labeling genetically modified foods.

  • Cosponsor of the Boxer-Sanders Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act, the most stringent climate bill in the Senate.

  • Opposes the House-passed bill that would reform the 1872 Mining Law. That law lets companies mine public lands without paying royalties and doesn't hold them responsible for mine cleanup. Obama said, "The legislation that has been proposed places a significant burden on the mining industry and could have a significant impact on jobs [in rural Nevada] given the difficulties the industry is already facing in maintaining its operations."

  • Says his religious faith inspires him to protect the environment.

  • Wants to increase funding to help farmers transition to organic and reform the USDA crop insurance program so it doesn't penalize organic farmers.

  • Calls for tougher pollution regulations on factory farms or concentrated animal-feeding operations (CAFOs).

  • When asked what he would do as president to address water and land issues in the U.S. West, Obama said he would prepare for water shortages in a climate-changed future, clean up abandoned mines, develop renewable energy, and employ a more balanced approach than the Bush administration to traditional energy development.

  • Has accepted $159,800 in contributions from executives and employees of Exelon, the nation's largest nuclear power-plant operator, for his presidential campaign as of late March 2007, and received notable support from Exelon in his previous political campaigns.

  • Primary cosponsor of the Lead Poisoning Reduction Act, which aims to protect children from toxic lead poisoning.

  • Primary cosponsor of the bipartisan Fuel Economy Reform Act, which would raise vehicle fuel-efficiency standards by 4 percent, or approximately one mile per gallon, each year. The measure includes tax incentives to help automakers retool their factories toward the goal. The bill also includes a provision that would let the Department of Transportation revise the annual targets if it determined that the planned increases were not safe, cost-effective, or technologically possible.

  • Calls for a National Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which would require that all transportation fuels sold in the U.S. have a 5 percent lower carbon intensity by 2015 and 10 percent lower by 2020. The legislation could spur the production of biofuels such as ethanol and biodiesel since one way to lower the carbon intensity of petroleum-based fuels is to add a proportion of biofuels. The proposal is modeled after a similar standard that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger implemented in California in January 2007.

  • Introduced the Oil SENSE Act (clever acronym alert! SENSE = Subsidy Elimination for New Strategies on Energy). The bill would eliminate select oil-industry tax breaks and require that oil companies renegotiate flawed Gulf of Mexico drilling leases that have let companies avoid paying billions in royalties to the federal treasury.

  • Cosponsor in 2005 of the Vehicle and Fuel Choices for American Security Act, which called for cutting America's oil consumption by 2.5 million barrels a day within a decade, and 10 million barrels a day by 2031. In 2005, U.S. consumption was 20 million barrels a day.

  • Introduced the 2005 FILL UP Act (clever acronym alert! FILL UP = Future Investment to Lessen Long-term Use of Petroleum). The bill would have required oil companies that made at least $1 billion in profits in the first quarter of 2006 to invest at least 1 percent of those profits in installing pumps for E85 and other alternative fuels at U.S. gas stations.

  • Has sponsored or cosponsored a mind-numbing array of bills to promote ethanol and other biofuels. The bills' many overlapping provisions include offering tax credits and other incentives for biofuel production, E85 infrastructure, and flex-fuel and alt-fuel vehicles; mandating that certain amounts of biofuels or other alternative fuels be added to the nation's vehicle fuel supply; requiring federal agencies to purchase alt-fuel vehicles and use ethanol blends when possible; and requiring all new cars sold in the U.S. to be dual-fuel capable.

  • Worked to get the nation's first zero-emissions coal power plant, FutureGen, built in Illinois. In December, the feds announced that it would be built in the state, but on Jan. 29 they said funding was being pulled from the project entirely.

  • Voted in favor of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, a sweeping, oil-friendly energy bill opposed by enviros; Obama cited the bill's support for ethanol and "clean coal" technology. The act passed and Bush signed it into law in August 2005.

  • Successfully inserted language into the 2005 Energy Policy Act that steered $40 million toward the goal of bringing a combined flexible-fuel and hybrid car to commercial distribution within five years.

Still Haven't Gotten Enough?


What did we miss? Tell us below in comments. We'll update this page as the presidential campaign continues.


Kate Sheppard and Todd Hymas Samkara contributed to this fact sheet.

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
< Previous | Next >
Comments: (10 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

FutureGen is not clean

Obama wants FutureGen's "clean" coal-fired power plant in Illinois. I've seen presentations by this group, in which they don't count the energy used before and after the coal is burned:

-the coal still has to be mined
-it still has to be shipped
-the waste products have to be shipped
-sequestering the carbon in underground mines and shafts will require energy expenditure

With net energy gain reduced by these processes, you're better off with wind and solar.

Obama is for more nuclear power plants.

More nuclear power plants will endanger the people and our environment.

Watch the movie "POISON DUST", see what your government is doing with the nuclear waste.  

There is a reason the corporate media was hyping Obama and Hillary before Hillary even announced that she was running, because they have sold out to the New World Order; and the owners of the FEDERAL RESERVE approve of Obama and Clinton.  

Only Kucinich has an environmentally sound plan for the U.S., but the corporations that rule this fascist country will not let Kucinich be heard.  

And you "Progressives" are OK with that?  

"Hello?  Is there anybody in there?"-Pink Floyd

Barack Obama Bringing Back Nixon and the 1970's

http://greenpieceblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/with-obama-is- ...

Folks,

let's collectively take a deep breath.  Obama is not perfect on the environment.  Neither is Hillary, nor John Edwards.  No competitive presidential candidate is, nor will ever be in this country.

The important thing is to get the major obstacles out of the way.  Obstacles like Bush.  Cheney.  Julie MacDonald.  Gale Norton.  The increasingly reactionary members of the Supreme Court.  The increasingly corporate-controlled media.  

These are obstacles that need to be removed one brick at a time, deliberately and painstakingly.  This takes work, time, patience, persistence.

This won't happen overnight.  There is no single political savior out there.  There never will be.  The people have to lead.  The people have to vote in supportive Senate and House candidates that will encourage rather than discourage our commander-in-chief to make progress on environmental issues.  The people have to support think tanks and environmental organizations and media outlets that are eager to speak truth to power and wrestle with difficult environmental questions.  

At that point, even imperfect politicians will have to either get on board or get out of the way.  Similar to the United States' reluctant signing-on last month to the international agreement to address climate change.  

At some point, even self-serving swine like the Bush Administration, if unable to do anything progressive, will at least get out of the way and quit being obstructionists.

However, in Obama's defense:

Iowa and Illinois are making TONS of money off corn-based ethanol and the crop subsidies that accompany it, related environmental degradation notwithstanding. Being from Illinois and having used Iowa as a springboard for launching his Presidential bid, Obama will probably not, if elected, throw biofuels overboard--immediately. But the environmental case against biofuels is strong, and growing, and Obama is, if nothing else, pragmatic and non-ideological. He is also very, very receptive to input from all quarters and has a demonstrated willingness to tell folks stuff they don't necessarily want to hear. He understands the country's hunger for a leader who can exhort people to make meaningful sacrifices in order to secure a better world. That's where we come in. One of Obama's top energy policy advisors, Jason Grumet, told me at a meeting in Nevada, Iowa in mid-2007 that he personally preferred a carbon tax to a cap-and-trade system for  reducing carbon dioxide emissions, but that, for the moment, a cap-and-trade system was far more politically feasible. THIS SUGGESTS TO ME THAT AN OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER A CARBON TAX AS OPPOSED TO A CAP-AND-TRADE SYSTEM IF WE PUSH HARDER FOR IT, PUTTING PRESSURE ON ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT. The best thing about Obama is that he believes so strongly in everyday citizens who are engaged in community improvement. He spent 3 years in the "trenches" as a community organizer, and it has shaped his thinking ever since. His campaign motto is Respect, Empower, Include. This is a guy we can work with, and moreover, I believe that his election could signal to would-be terrorists abroad that America might not be so awful after all, which could give us the breathing room we need to help mend our relationships abroad--such an important precursor to the crafting of stronger worldwide environmental standards.  


Obama in the 2008 Climate Cup

The creative do-gooders at TitanGreens.com decided to try their hand at determining the "greenest candidate" with the 2008 Climate Cup. We seeded the hopefuls, weighed the issues, and let the politicians fight it out.
Check out how Barack Obama fared...
http://titancast.titantv.com/afdfefb5bcec4ccca2f2e5a9ec40 ...


FutureGen

In response to the comments regarding futuregen not being clean, your right it isn't clean, however it is CLEANER than the current coal fired power plants it would potentially replace.  I think we can all agree that the US needs to fundamentally change the way it currently produces energy, and most of us would agree that nuclear is not the way to go.  That leaves us with natural gas (we're rapidly running out), hydroelectric (anyone here a big fan of damns?), wind/solar ( which I lump together as they are both a product of the suns input) and coal.  Now I am the first person to say that wind/solar is the way to go now and in the future but without an rapid developement of a massive system of energy storage for the days when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing that leads us back to coal.  We have tremendous domestic coal reserves and if we would actually spend the money to research cleaner ways of utilizing this coal (I'm looking at you DOE)then perhaps it could be a viable energy source.  Sure FutureGen has some serious flaws, but at least it's a step towards cleaner energy production.  Now if only we didn't have to mine the stuff........

Obama Supports Cycling, Transit and Smart Growth

What more to say. He is the only candidate to support these practical solutions instead of falling completely for the alternative fuel fantasies.

Letter to Obama

Let's see what Obama's real environmental policy stance is...

http://greengolingo.blogspot.com/2008/02/open-letter-to-s ...

Enough of this failure to be clear and straightforward on his stance.


not so sure

I'm not so sure that the corporate media have been hyping Obama or Clinton because of anything other than the basic fact that they are newsworthy and that the republican side isn't. "News" to the mainstream media and really.. any popular websites out there... is something controversial, something worth talking about. Hillary and Obama fighting to win the democratic nomination is completely worthy to be hyped up... it's got 2 sides of a coin completely angered and hostile against eachother.. that's what the crappy news agencies are known to show, and it makes sense.

I'm very interested in seeing your "poison dust" documentary... I'm open minded and realize money plays too much of a role in most organizations including the energy sector and our government as well. I have a feeling this film won't be too much of a surprise. By the way, did you get a chance to see the Barack Obama Yes We Can video? This was totally unpaid for, and was created by people who's time is very valuable. People feel compelled to help Obama not because of the media hype.. but because they feel he is truly going to let the voice of the American people finally get heard. I understand you're hesitation on why he seems so popular... everyone should be skeptical and should research the candidates themselves.. even some professors are having discussions as to why Obama is so popular. People are finding it tough to believe after the crap we put up with with Bush, that a real human could be put into office.

Surely, Obama might not yet have thought completely about all the environmental issues... noone can go into office with all the answers for everything. I just hope, just as you do, that after being elected that he finds out all these other things that you mentioned, or otherwise that need to be addressed as well. One thing he realizes I think that gives me comfort to believe this is that he understands he doesn't know everything and Barack Obama is appointing people in positions that he doesn't know much about, but knows there must be someone to inform him about possible issues.

Sorry for the rant, but I think Obama is a huge step in the right direction... regardless of whether he knows all the issues or not.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
How Green Is Your Candidate? Interviews and info on the presidential candidates' environmental positions.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | Weekly Recipes | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks