| Headline |
Author |
Published |
Section |
A Coal New World Landmark ruling halts Georgia coal plant on basis of CO2 emissions |
|
30 Jun 2008 |
News |
| Posted at 2:38 PM on 30 Jun 2008 A Georgia coal plant cannot go forward until it receives an air-pollution permit limiting its carbon-dioxide emissions, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore ruled Monday. The ruling marks the first time a judge has used the Supreme Court's classification of CO2 as a pollutant to regulate emissions from an industrial source. Moore's decision overturns a p ... |
|
| Topics: air pollution, climate, coal, energy, Georgia, greenhouse-gas emissions, litigation, news, progress (all these topics) |
|
|
Fear of the day
|
David Roberts |
03 Jun 2008 |
Gristmill |
| What if the anticipation of carbon legislation has driven more investment away from coal than actual carbon legislation will? |
|
| Topics: carbon tax, carbon trading, climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, legislation (all these topics) |
|
|
Deloitte survey of consumers and utility regulators
|
David Roberts |
20 May 2008 |
Gristmill |
| On Monday, consultant firm Deloitte released two new surveys, one of consumers and one of utility regulators. There's some fairly interesting stuff in there. First off, some 87 percent of utility regulators expect the cost of producing electricity to rise next year. Why? Here's what they attribute it to: Fuel prices (35 percent). Environmental compliance (23 percent). Capital costs (21 percent). Inflation (11 percent). Asked to rate options by thei ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, energy at home, greenhouse-gas emissions, renewable energy (all these topics) |
|
|
Is the World Bank coal-fused? Coal still has no place in clean development |
Joseph Romm |
08 Apr 2008 |
Gristmill |
| You knew it had to happen: the World Bank now has the same climate sensibility as ... the Kansas House. Scientist Jim Hansen, on the other hand, has requested a meeting with Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers, arguing for a moratorium on coal plants until carbon capture and storage technology is available. Even Wall Street looks on coal skeptically. Last Friday, the Kansas House failed to override Sebelius' veto of two new plants by only one vote. And the World Bank is con ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, India, insanity, politics, World Bank (all these topics) |
|
|
Thought: Control Waxman and Markey introduce bill to ban new dirty coal plants |
|
11 Mar 2008 |
News |
| Posted at 10:09 AM on 11 Mar 2008 House Representatives Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) have introduced the "Moratorium on Uncontrolled Power Plants Act of 2008," which would do pretty much what it sounds like: prevent new coal plants in the U.S. unless they're built with advanced pollution controls. Says Waxman, "The altemative is senseless -- locking in decades of additional global war ... |
|
| Topics: carbon sequestration, climate, coal, Ed Markey, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, legislation, news, politics, US House of Representatives (all these topics) |
|
|
NBC on ABEC
|
David Roberts |
25 Feb 2008 |
Gristmill |
| Via ThinkProgress comes this segment on NBC Nightly News: Obviously I am totally unable to judge these things with any sort of objectivity. All I see is a huge, wealthy, politically connected industry using propaganda techniques to push a dirty facility on a community that is so poor and desperate that it's willing to sell its children's health for a short-term economic boost. Naturally NBC's not going to say that. Still, they do a fairly decent job putting the re ... |
|
| Topics: air pollution, climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Carbon-loaded question Obama parries ABEC |
David Roberts |
31 Jan 2008 |
Gristmill |
| Obama gets buttonholed by a planted ABEC coal shill: Nothing he says here is particularly objectionable. The priority on reducing CO2 emissions is welcome. It is true that if we can figure out a way to cost-effectively sequester coal emissions, it will bring some benefit. More important, though, is what's not said. He says we can't emit more CO2, but he stops short of calling for a moratorium on dirty coal plants with no sequestration. (He says he won't 'license ... |
|
| Topics: Barack Obama, climate, coal, elections, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, politics, presidential race 08 (all these topics) |
|
|
Gnashing my teeth over globalization Can economic democracy make the global economy more sustainable? |
Jon Rynn |
07 Jan 2008 |
Gristmill |
| Worried about more coal plants, carbon emissions from transportation, and a crumbling infrastructure? Evidence provided by several recent reports point to one of the least explored causes of these problems: globalization, that is, the transfer of manufacturing capacity from developed to developing countries, particularly China. The mechanisms differ. The U.S. and Europe, which could manufacture using environmentally benign techniques, instead use old, polluting techn ... |
|
| Topics: air pollution, business, China, climate, coal, economy, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, United States (all these topics) |
|
|
Learn more about what's killing us Three new sites track individual power plants and your connection to them |
David Roberts |
15 Nov 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Three excellent new sites went up in the last few days, all related to the single biggest source of CO2 emissions in the world: power plants. CARMA contains "the world's most detailed and comprehensive information on carbon emissions resulting from the production of electricity." You can track power plants in any zip code or any part of the world, see how much CO2 they emit, and how they rank relative to other plants. Here are some tips to get you started us ... |
|
| Topics: greenhouse-gas emissions, climate, energy, coal (all these topics) |
|
|
Coal: Still not cheap The cost of the FutureGen 'clean coal' plant doubles |
Sean Casten |
13 Nov 2007 |
Gristmill |
| This from Greenwire today ($ub req'd): 'The DOE FutureGen program has announced that their 'clean coal' plus carbon sequestration is checking in at $1.8 billion for a 275 MW plant, or $6500/kW.' OK, so it's at an early stage, but even if you cut that cost in half, it still doesn't pencil out. How long before we get over the illusion that coal is cheap? Story below the fold. (Note that I have given them the benefit of the doubt that their description of the pla ... |
|
| Topics: greenhouse-gas emissions, energy, coal, climate (all these topics) |
|
|
Carbon sequestration and the precautionary principle A guest essay from Peter Montague raises questions about the rush to sequestration |
David Roberts |
12 Nov 2007 |
Gristmill |
| The following is a guest essay from Peter Montague, executive director of the Environmental Research Foundation. ----- In response to a relentless stream of bad news about global warming, a cluster of major industries has formed a loose partnership with big environmental groups, prestigious universities, philanthropic foundations, and the U.S. federal government -- all promoting a technical quick-fix for global warming called "carbon sequestration." ... |
|
| Topics: carbon sequestration, climate, climate change mitigation, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Memo to the Air Force Stop misleading the public on liquid coal |
Joseph Romm |
02 Nov 2007 |
Gristmill |
| TO: William Anderson, assistant Air Force secretary FROM: Climate Progress, blog SUBJECT: Your nonsensical claims in a recent Reuters piece, 'US Air Force Eyes Alternative Fuel, Slashing CO2.' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Liquid coal cannot be part of a plan to 'zero out' the Air Force's carbon output -- contrary to your repeated claims. BACKGROUND: The following press release masquerading as a genuine news story appeared this week: The world's most powerful air force ... |
|
| Topics: carbon neutral, climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Ecomagination and coal As long as GE funds coal, its net impact is far from green |
David Roberts |
17 Sep 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Let me pull a few excerpts from a recent WSJ story on the progress of GE's much-touted "ecomagination" campaign: 'I don't want to change the economic flow of the company,' [CEO Jeffrey] Immelt says. So GE continues to sell coal-fired steam turbines and is delving deeper into oil-and-gas production. Meanwhile, its finance unit seeks out coal-related investments including power plants, which are a leading cause of carbon-dioxide emissions in the U.S. ... ... |
|
| Topics: business, climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, greening biz operations (all these topics) |
|
|
Post-combustion carbon dioxide capture A new technology to reduce GHG emissions from coal plants |
Joseph Romm |
17 Aug 2007 |
Gristmill |
| The carbon capture and storage (CCS) discussion has focused on pre-combustion capture of CO2, since it has long been assumed that it is easier and cheaper than trying to capture the CO2 post-combustion from the flue gas (exhaust stream). The problem is: (1) that approach limits CCS to new coal plants, and (2) that requires utilities to build integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants, which are more expensive to build and more expensive to maintain. Po ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Carbon- and nuclear-free America possible by 2050 Now that's a 12-step program |
JMG |
01 Aug 2007 |
Gristmill |
| A hopeful press release touting an even more hopeful (wishful?) report: Takoma Park, MD -- At the G-8 summit in Germany in June 2007, President Bush promised to 'consider seriously' the European Union goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions sufficiently to limit global temperature rise to about 4 degrees Fahrenheit. A new study concludes that the United States could eliminate almost all of its carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2050. It also concludes that it is possible ... |
|
| Topics: climate, climate change mitigation, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, nuclear power, politics, renewable energy (all these topics) |
|
|
More of NASA's James Hansen on Old King Coal How coal CO2 is different from oil CO2 |
Joseph Romm |
24 Jul 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Our top climate scientist has sent out a really, really long email (where does he find the time?), mostly discussing comments on his recent essay on coal. I think Hansen is the clearest thinker on climate among the top scientists in the field, so I will reprint the email, breaking it up into several postings. The first one addresses "Coal-CO2 versus Oil-CO2": My statement that releasing a coal-CO2 molecule into the air is more harmful than setting ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, James Hansen, oil (all these topics) |
|
|
Coal is the enemy of the human race: Gloating edition In which I rejoice |
David Roberts |
23 Jul 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Count me among those rejoicing: Citigroup analyst John Hill downgraded coal company stocks across the board in a report this week, saying that expected U.S. greenhouse gas regulations on coal, which emits more of the main heat-trapping gas carbon dioxide than any other fuel, paint a bleak outlook for the sector. Downward pressure on stock prices by a current U.S. coal oversupply could last for more than a year, he wrote. If that happens it could coincide with 200 ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, elections, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, presidential race 08 (all these topics) |
|
|
Glenn Beck is an ass And he argues that cow farts produce more greenhouse gases than cars |
Adam Browning |
20 Jul 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Check out this clip (via RAN) of the insufferable Glenn Beck running through asinine talking points while disparaging Live Earth: I'm not the first to note this, but it is really remarkable that CNN, a formerly respected former news network, stoops to this egregious low. Mike Brune of the Rainforest Action Network does an admirable job of keeping his dignity, not committing any felonies no matter how justified, and calling him on his bull. If, in the unlik ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, green living, greenhouse-gas emissions, jackassery (all these topics) |
|
|
Coal is the enemy of the human race: Robert Murray can kiss my ass edition Coal exec whines about regulations on his ability to destroy the earth and his workers |
David Roberts |
28 Jun 2007 |
Gristmill |
| This is not helping me keep my blood pressure down. Poor, poor coal executive feels persecuted: A senior coal company executive on Wednesday lambasted U.S. lawmakers for proposing caps on emissions blamed for global warming, saying the Democrats were out to destroy America's coal industry. Robert Murray, chairman, president and chief executive of Murray Energy Corp., also blasted the federal government's mine safety agency for 'outrageous' new fines that he war ... |
|
| Topics: climate, climate change mitigation, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Breaking: Senate fights off liquid coal More victories |
David Roberts |
19 Jun 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Sweet! Here's a press release I just got from Friends of the Earth: ----- WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Senate today voted against two attempts to encourage the use of liquid coal, rejecting a pair of amendments to the energy bill that would have alternately mandated 6 billion gallons of liquid coal use annually by 2022 or provided $10 billion in loan subsidies to produce liquid coal. 'This is a victory for anyone who takes global warming seriously or cares about env ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal-to-liquid fuel, Congress, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, legislation, politics, US Senate (all these topics) |
|
|
The path to carbon capture and storage A new report |
Joseph Romm |
01 Jun 2007 |
Gristmill |
| The Center for American Progress has a terrific new report on "Global Warming and the Future of Coal" by Ken Berlin and Robert Sussman. The report explores what to do about the explosive growth in coal plant construction projected for the coming quarter century -- 1,400 gigawatts of electricity by 2030, with more than 10 percent in the U.S. alone. In the absence of emission controls, these new plants will increase worldwide annual emissions of carbo ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Are Republican presidential candidates taking global warming seriously? Brownback's plan is not promising |
David Roberts |
23 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| He hasn't released a detailed plan yet, but Republican presidential contender Sam Brownback gave a speech yesterday to the Set America Free coalition that outlined his thoughts on energy policy. (There's more info in this Greenwire story, but it's subscription only.) Republican candidates haven't talked about climate and energy as much as their Dem counterparts, but Brownback's comments are more or less representative. Consider this a critique, then, of mainstream Re ... |
|
| Topics: climate, climate change mitigation, coal, elections, energy, ethanol, greenhouse-gas emissions, nuclear power, oil, politics (all these topics) |
|
|
The growth rate of carbon emissions has tripled That ain't good |
Joseph Romm |
22 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| A stunning new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) finds that the growth rate of CO2 emissions has tripled in recent years: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning and industrial processes have been accelerating at a global scale, with their growth rate increasing from 1.1 percent/year for 1990-1999 to >3 percent/year for 2000-2004. The emissions growth rate since 2000 was greater than for the most fossil-fuel intensive of the Interg ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|
Peak oil and climate change New Hansen paper |
John McGrath |
22 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| Today the Oil Drum linked to a James Hansen released paper analyzing the impact of peak oil, peak gas, and peak coal on the likely emissions of carbon. Hansen notes that most of our emissions scenarios have thus far failed to account for whether the carbon will even be there to burn. Plenty of graphy goodness, but what I took away was this: There's just enough oil and gas left in the ground to take us up to, or maybe a bit over, the 450 parts per million of CO2 that ... |
|
| Topics: climate, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, James Hansen, natural gas, oil (all these topics) |
|
|
WWF on coal It's bad |
David Roberts |
11 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| The WWF has a new briefing out called "Are the costs of using coal higher than the cost of cleaning it up?" It contains the standard "coal is the enemy of the human race" statistics, and concludes with six recommendations for how to reduce coal's impact on global warming: 1. Emerging economies need access to best-available-technologies including last-generation coal-fired power technology and support from G8 nations and the financial sector in ... |
|
| Topics: climate, climate change mitigation, coal, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions (all these topics) |
|
|