|
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
|
|
 Stories About: coal AND elections AND energy AND greenhouse-gas emissions AND politics
| Headline |
Author |
Published |
Section |
Carbon-loaded question Obama parries ABEC |
David Roberts |
31 Jan 2008 |
Gristmill |
| Obama gets buttonholed by a planted ABEC coal shill: Nothing he says here is particularly objectionable. The priority on reducing CO2 emissions is welcome. It is true that if we can figure out a way to cost-effectively sequester coal emissions, it will bring some benefit. More important, though, is what's not said. He says we can't emit more CO2, but he stops short of calling for a moratorium on dirty coal plants with no sequestration. (He says he won't 'license ... |
|
| Topics: Barack Obama, climate, coal, elections, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, politics, presidential race 08 (all these topics) |
|
|
Are Republican presidential candidates taking global warming seriously? Brownback's plan is not promising |
David Roberts |
23 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| He hasn't released a detailed plan yet, but Republican presidential contender Sam Brownback gave a speech yesterday to the Set America Free coalition that outlined his thoughts on energy policy. (There's more info in this Greenwire story, but it's subscription only.) Republican candidates haven't talked about climate and energy as much as their Dem counterparts, but Brownback's comments are more or less representative. Consider this a critique, then, of mainstream Re ... |
|
| Topics: climate, climate change mitigation, coal, elections, energy, ethanol, greenhouse-gas emissions, nuclear power, oil, politics (all these topics) |
|
|
Department of unresolved contradictions
|
David Roberts |
23 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| I'm going to put up a longer post about this in a second, but for now, I merely note the following two statements from Republican presidential candidate Sam Brownback's energy speech. One: ... we need to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere. This is possible using our ingenuity, resources and determination. Two: Coal needs to be at the center of our energy policy for the foreseeable future. |
|
| Topics: coal, elections, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, politics (all these topics) |
|
|
Barack Obama is not serious about global warming That's what his support for CTL shows |
David Roberts |
11 May 2007 |
Gristmill |
| The LA Times has a long story about the growing conflict over coal-to-liquid (CTL) fuel. This is the most important paragraph in the piece, though it is inexplicably buried at the bottom: A new study has concluded that turning coal into liquid fuel yields 125% more carbon dioxide than producing diesel fuel and 66% more than gasoline. If the carbon dioxide is captured and permanently stored, liquid coal emits 20% more greenhouse gas than diesel but 11% less than conv ... |
|
| Topics: Barack Obama, climate, climate change mitigation, coal, elections, energy, greenhouse-gas emissions, politics (all these topics) |
|
|
|
|