Tagged with Clean Energy Subscribe by RSS

  • How to make 1.7 million new clean energy jobs permanent 1

    Posted 19 hours, 2 minutes ago The challenges facing President Obama and the U.S. Congress have not gone away. Paul Krugman worries that "unemployment is likely to stay near its current level for a year or more," because "much of the political establishment now sees stimulus as having been discredited by events, so that it's very hard to come back and scale the policy up to where it should have been in the first place." But there remains a pathway out of Krugman's dire vision of "a process of defining prosperity down" -- if enough politicians embrace the alternative vision of a green economy, promoted by political leaders as far apart on the ideological spectrum as Van Jones and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). The basic concept is simple -- heat up the economy by cooling down the planet:
  • But is it set to announce emissions targets?

    India aims for 20 gigawatts solar by 2022 0

    Posted 2 days, 2 hours ago
  • Other clean energy sources drop 10%

    New Energy Finance: Solar power 50% cheaper by year end 0

    Posted 2 days, 3 hours ago
  • Novels, Exposes, Histories, Poems, Calls to Action!

    Climate Hope: Inspiring 2009 Books for Clean Energy 0

    Posted 3 days, 18 hours ago
  • Tom Friedman on “What They Really Believe” 0

    Posted 2 weeks ago
  • Tortoise and the hare -- a clean energy tale

    Winning the clean energy race: a new strategy for American leadership 5

    Posted 2 weeks ago You know times are changing when China, the world’s greatest polluter, and other Asian nations are poised to dominate the burgeoning global clean-tech industry by out-investing the United States. That’s the conclusion of a large new report we co-authored called "Rising Tigers, Sleeping Giant," released this week by the Breakthrough Institute and Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.
  • Exclusive new Caldeira analysis explains “the burning of organic carbon warms the Earth about 100,000 times more from climate effects than it does through the release of chemical energy in combustion.”

    Why solar energy trumps coal power 0

    Posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
  • Maryland county draws a “car-free blueprint for growth” 0

    Posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
  • Africa returns to Barcelona talks, while U.S. resists giving up the numbers 0

    Posted 4 weeks ago Climate negotiators are terribly frustrated with the United States for not taking two momentous steps -- defining the quantity of carbon it is ready to remove from the atmosphere, and putting on the table a definite dollar amount to help developing nations make the transition to cleaner and economically greener economies.
  • Toshiba tells San Antonio its new twin $13 billion nukes will cost $4 billion more! This looks like a job for clean energy.

    San Antonio balks at Toshiba nuclear deal 0

    Posted 1 month ago
  • They mean well

    What does the Pew poll mean? 5

    Posted 1 month, 1 week ago A Pew poll shows declining belief in climate change. Don't panic.
  • Clean tech reality check

    Paging Dr. Chu, venture capitalist 2

    Posted 1 month, 2 weeks ago Despite all the entrepreneurial buzz around clean energy companies, it's going to take very deep pockets to get projects online at utility scale. That's why Energy Secretary Steven Chu may be the industry's most important venture capitalist.
  • Downright Paltry Private Spending

    National Institutes of Energy needed to fill energy research and development gap 0

    Posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago The U.S. biomedical and pharmaceutical industry invests between 10-20 percent of revenues in research and development (R&D) and new product development, spending $58.8 billion on R&D in 2007. The U.S. government adds an additional $30 billion per year investment in biomedical R&D through the National Institutes of Health. In contrast, the U.S. energy sector invests well below $3 billion annually in R&D in an industry with well over a trillion dollars in annual revenue.
  • TOO COAL FOR SCHOOL

    Dirty energy fuels college campuses 3

    Posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago Many of us look back in disbelief at some of the things we did in college. We’re seeing that same sense of disbelief from current college students when they learn that their campuses are still powered by coal.
  • EV + PV = ROI

    SolarCity makes electric cars an even smarter investment 19

    Posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago The real story behind California's "solar highway" is how the emerging electric vehicle industry will foster the adoption of residential and commercial photovoltaic systems.
  • Young, Green, and Out of Work 0

    Posted 1 month, 3 weeks ago
  • Rooting for the underdog

    For Khosla, clean tech is all about scale 0

    Posted 2 months, 1 week ago Venture capitalist Vinod Khosla believes "clean tech" is all about greening "old tech."
  • Extra largesse

    Fossil fuel subsidies dwarf clean energy subsidies; Obama wants to eliminate them 13

    Posted 2 months, 1 week ago One often hears opponents of clean energy say that renewable sources are too expensive; they can't get by without subsidies; they can't compete in a "free market." One of the many reasons this is a daffy argument is that there is no such thing as a free market, certainly not in energy. Fossil fuels have benefited from a century of subsidies and supporting infrastructure -- and are still subsidized lavishly relative to their scrappy little competitors. This is a point enviros often make, but a new report from the Environmental Law Institute and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars puts some teeth in it.
  • The clean-energy investment agenda 6

    Posted 2 months, 1 week ago The United States is having the wrong public debate about global warming.
  • CBS’s Declan McCullagh promotes another false CEI attack on clean energy reform 1

    Posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago

    According to Declan McCullagh, a libertarian blogger who works for CBS Interactive, secret Obama administration documents reveal that the cost of clean energy cap-and-trade legislation would be $1,761 per household -- despite official estimates from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Congressional Budget Office, and the Energy Information Administration of about a postage stamp a day.

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?