<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Grist Feed: American Petroleum Institute]]></title>
    <link>http://www.grist.org/</link>
    <description>Articles about American Petroleum Institute from your friends at Grist </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <webMaster>webmaster@grist.org (Grist)</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 2:43:19 PDT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 1 Dec 2009 2:43:19 PDT</lastBuildDate>
    <copyright>2009, Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved</copyright>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[House GOP still repeats petroleum industry falsehood about CBO findings on gas prices]]></title>
            <link>http://www.grist.org/article/house-gop-still-repeats-petroleum-industry-falsehood-about-cbo-findings-on-/</link>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:33:03 -0700</pubDate>
            <author>Joseph Romm</author>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/house-gop-still-repeats-petroleum-industry-falsehood-about-cbo-findings-on-/</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[by Joseph Romm <br>Reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news, humor, and inspiration, visit <a href="http://www.grist.org">www.grist.org</a>.<br><br><p>The House GOP loves to repeat falsehoods about climate and clean energy action (see "<a title="Permanent Link to MIT Professor tells GOP to stop &lsquo;misrepresenting' his work and inflating the cost to families of cap-and-trade by a factor of 10." rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/06/26/2009/06/21/2009/04/01/mit-reilly-energy-prices-tax-global-warming-bill/">MIT Professor tells GOP to stop &lsquo;misrepresenting' his work and inflating the cost to families of cap-and-trade by a factor of 10</a>" and then again three weeks later, <a title="Permanent Link to Exclusive:  MIT Professor says GOP, Weekly Standard " rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/06/26/2009/06/21/2009/04/23/mit-study-waxman-markey-weekly-standard-misrepresentation-of-his-april-2007-study-to-project-costs-for-waxman-markey-is-inappropriate-silly-and-qu/">MIT
Professor says GOP "misrepresentation" of his April 2007 study to
project costs for Waxman-Markey is "inappropriate," "silly" and "just
wrong"</a>).</p>
<p>If you are listening to the House floor debate over the "rule" that
will set the terms of the debate for Waxman-Markey, then you've heard
pretty much every Republican repeat the claim that the Congressional
Budget Office found that W-M would add $.77 a gallon to the price of
gasoline in the next decade.</p>
<p><strong>That charge is false.&nbsp; It comes from the American Petroleum Institute</strong>, (see <a href="http://blog.energytomorrow.org/2009/06/4-gasoline.html">here</a>)
which decided to ignore the actual CBO analysis and offer its own
instead, claiming it is what CBO found.&nbsp; The API is a strong opponent
of the bill and has been pushing disinformation on global warming for
more than a decade.</p>
<p>As a study by 5 national laboratories noted in1998, "<a href="http://www.ornl.gov/sci/eere/PDFs/CON444/Ch1.pdf">$50 per tonne of carbon [$14 a tonne of carbon dioxide] corresponds to 12.5 cents per gallon of gasoline</a>."</p>
<p><strong>To cause a $.77 increase in gasoline prices, the climate
bill would have to result in greenhouse gas allowance prices of some
$85 a ton of CO2. </strong>Now you can go to <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10262/hr2454.pdf">Table 3 of the CBO analysis</a> yourself, and you'll see that CBO estimates <strong>the allowance price will hit $26 a ton in 2019 </strong>- and that is in actual (not inflation-adjusted) dollars.&nbsp; In 2008 dollars, that would be closer to $21 to $22.&nbsp; So in fact <strong>the CBO estimates that gasoline prices in 2019 would be about 20 cents a gallon higher than today (in constant dollars).</strong> And that's a lot lower than the price will rise if we don't take strong
action to jumpstart the transition to a cleaner, more efficient energy
system.</p>
<p>In fact, CBO found, "<a title="Permanent Link to CBO stunner:  Waxman-Markey cuts U.S. GHGs sharply but costs only a postage stamp a day - without counting the efficiency savings" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/06/26/2009/06/22/cbo-stunner-waxman-markey-postage-stamp-a-day-low-income-families-efficiency-savings/">Waxman-Markey cuts U.S. GHGs sharply but costs only a postage stamp a day - without counting the efficiency savings</a>."</p></br></br></a></br>    <p><strong>Related Links:</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/voters-in-ohio-michigan-and-missouri-support-climate-action/">Voters in Ohio, Michigan and Missouri support climate action</a></p>




<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/senate-gop-embrace-inhofes-boycott-of-clean-energy-jobs-act-in-effort-to-th/">Senate GOP embrace Inhofe&#8217;s boycott of Clean Energy Jobs Act in effort to thwart Copenhagen</a></p>




<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/honey-i-shrunk-the-gop-part-4/">Honey, I shrunk the GOP, Part 4</a></p>


]]></description>
        </item>
    
</channel>
</rss>