<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for DOE applies to store nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Orfintain</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/yucca6/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:51:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/yucca6/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>On Polotics and Reason</strong></p><p>People tend the view the yucca mountain project in on of two ways</p><p>
1)As a way to argue their view for or against nuclear energy </p><p>
This project is not a green light for building lots more nuclear power plants.</p><p>
Yucca mountain is is about what do with the stockpiles of nuclear waste we have scattered about the country today</p><p>
2)The not in my backyard position<br>
The proximity of nuclear waste to people would be greatly reduced when moved to yucca mountain and away from power plants that are in rural areas in some cases.</p><p>
The nuclear waste we have created is never going to "go-away" yucca mountain is the most safe realistic solution the problem.<br>
</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>On Polotics and Reason</strong></p><p>People tend the view the yucca mountain project in on of two ways</p><p>
1)As a way to argue their view for or against nuclear energy </p><p>
This project is not a green light for building lots more nuclear power plants.</p><p>
Yucca mountain is is about what do with the stockpiles of nuclear waste we have scattered about the country today</p><p>
2)The not in my backyard position<br>
The proximity of nuclear waste to people would be greatly reduced when moved to yucca mountain and away from power plants that are in rural areas in some cases.</p><p>
The nuclear waste we have created is never going to "go-away" yucca mountain is the most safe realistic solution the problem.<br>
</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Wolverine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/yucca6/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:21:25 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/yucca6/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Leave Nuclear Waste Where It Is</strong></p><p>The only reason some people want to find a place to put all the U.S. nuclear waste is to help out the nuclear industry, which is the main proponent of finding a repository and of promoting Yucca Mountain. &nbsp;Aside from putting the waste in the homes of everyone who profits from and/or supports nuclear power, leaving it in the power plants is the best option. &nbsp;Eventually, they'll become so choked with their own waste they'll have to shut down.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Leave Nuclear Waste Where It Is</strong></p><p>The only reason some people want to find a place to put all the U.S. nuclear waste is to help out the nuclear industry, which is the main proponent of finding a repository and of promoting Yucca Mountain. &nbsp;Aside from putting the waste in the homes of everyone who profits from and/or supports nuclear power, leaving it in the power plants is the best option. &nbsp;Eventually, they'll become so choked with their own waste they'll have to shut down.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>