<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for EPA puts kibosh on wetland-destructive Army Corps project]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/yazoo1/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:15:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/yazoo1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Huh...EPA did somethin' right for a change...</strong></p><p>...then again, 7 decades in the making pretty much gives the impression that the project was goin' nowhere fast to begin with.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Huh...EPA did somethin' right for a change...</strong></p><p>...then again, 7 decades in the making pretty much gives the impression that the project was goin' nowhere fast to begin with.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Jeremiah</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/yazoo1/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:15:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/yazoo1/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Just maybe...?</strong></p><p>Grist says the EPA concluded "that maybe, just maybe, sucking all that wet out...". Once again Grist characterizes the EPA as anti-environment.</p><p>
Actuall the EPA press release said "The Yazoo Backwater Area contains some of the richest wetland and aquatic resources in the nation, and serves as critical fish and wildlife habitat. EPA concluded that the proposed project would result in unacceptable damage to these valuable resources that are used for wildlife, economic, and recreational purposes."</p><p>
The EPA didn't think there was any maybe about it. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Just maybe...?</strong></p><p>Grist says the EPA concluded "that maybe, just maybe, sucking all that wet out...". Once again Grist characterizes the EPA as anti-environment.</p><p>
Actuall the EPA press release said "The Yazoo Backwater Area contains some of the richest wetland and aquatic resources in the nation, and serves as critical fish and wildlife habitat. EPA concluded that the proposed project would result in unacceptable damage to these valuable resources that are used for wildlife, economic, and recreational purposes."</p><p>
The EPA didn't think there was any maybe about it. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>