Mr. Roberts article is filled with inaccuracies and half truths.  The implication of the article is that his statements are a reflection of the groups that have provided contributions and not convictions based on facts. Senator Inhofe has made several floor statements on the Senate floor that have been based on solid science and make a convincing case for his position.  Unless Mr. Roberts can refute that science he should not cavalierly question the Senator's motives.