<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for So much BS in so few words!]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Zarkov</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:25:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I'm a peach</strong></p><p>Impeach Bush.... has to be otherwise the New World Order will become The Screw World Order.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I'm a peach</strong></p><p>Impeach Bush.... has to be otherwise the New World Order will become The Screw World Order.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by akbeancounter</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:43:25 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rectal Ventriloquism</strong></p><p>This is a great response. &nbsp;Basically, the Bush Administration has wanted to regulate CO2 for years, but those slackers Clinton and Gore didn't want to do anything about it. &nbsp;So this is a huge victory for the Administration, because now they can carry out the environmentally-minded policies they've always supported. &nbsp;Truly a stunning display of double-talk.</p><p>
Zarkov said:<br>
Impeach Bush<br>
It might do more good to remove him from office.</p><p>
-- A.

<p>Taking accounting to the extreme since 2004.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rectal Ventriloquism</strong></p><p>This is a great response. &nbsp;Basically, the Bush Administration has wanted to regulate CO2 for years, but those slackers Clinton and Gore didn't want to do anything about it. &nbsp;So this is a huge victory for the Administration, because now they can carry out the environmentally-minded policies they've always supported. &nbsp;Truly a stunning display of double-talk.</p><p>
Zarkov said:<br>
Impeach Bush<br>
It might do more good to remove him from office.</p><p>
-- A.

<p>Taking accounting to the extreme since 2004.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:47:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>*shiver*</strong></p><p>uhg.... United States President Dick Chenny</p><p>
No thank you.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>*shiver*</strong></p><p>uhg.... United States President Dick Chenny</p><p>
No thank you.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Rune</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:59:49 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Pelosi in '07</strong></p><p>Nothin' sez you can't impeach them both, given that they have both committed multiple high crimes. &nbsp;In fact, the only way to stop them from committing more high crimes is to get them out of high offices where they can and will do so.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Pelosi in '07</strong></p><p>Nothin' sez you can't impeach them both, given that they have both committed multiple high crimes. &nbsp;In fact, the only way to stop them from committing more high crimes is to get them out of high offices where they can and will do so.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Zarkov</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:02:54 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/white-house-responds-to-scotus-case/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah !!!</strong></p><p>&gt;&gt; Pelosi in '07</p><p>
now there's a WOMAN I admire<br>
:) yeah</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah !!!</strong></p><p>&gt;&gt; Pelosi in '07</p><p>
now there's a WOMAN I admire<br>
:) yeah</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>