<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for How did so much water get into a New Orleans canal?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by drocto</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/warning-signs-from-hurricane-gustav/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:27:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/warning-signs-from-hurricane-gustav/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>not worth saving</strong></p><p>It is true that natural systems should be reestablished to add protection. &nbsp;However, even with these intact, New Orleans is low and sinking. &nbsp;The U.S. is large and there are many competing funding needs. &nbsp;It is unwise to spend hundreds of billions in an effort that could ultimately prove futile and lead to greater disasters. &nbsp;(Sound familiar) &nbsp;New Orleans will remain a very easy terrorist target when water levels are high.</p><p>
Most of the low parts of the city should not be rebuilt or protected. &nbsp;Funds should be used to help dislocated folks instead.</p><p>
Side note: &nbsp;Water topping over levies for a long period of time is not a disaster. &nbsp;The problem is when the flow of water into the city exceeds pumping capabilities. &nbsp;Then you get flooding if that condition lasts long enough.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>not worth saving</strong></p><p>It is true that natural systems should be reestablished to add protection. &nbsp;However, even with these intact, New Orleans is low and sinking. &nbsp;The U.S. is large and there are many competing funding needs. &nbsp;It is unwise to spend hundreds of billions in an effort that could ultimately prove futile and lead to greater disasters. &nbsp;(Sound familiar) &nbsp;New Orleans will remain a very easy terrorist target when water levels are high.</p><p>
Most of the low parts of the city should not be rebuilt or protected. &nbsp;Funds should be used to help dislocated folks instead.</p><p>
Side note: &nbsp;Water topping over levies for a long period of time is not a disaster. &nbsp;The problem is when the flow of water into the city exceeds pumping capabilities. &nbsp;Then you get flooding if that condition lasts long enough.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>