<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Offers boldest plan of any candidate]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by TariffDude</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:07:19 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let's look at the record...</strong></p><p>I live in Iowa. &nbsp;Trust me, it's not pretty. &nbsp;Ok, I don't pay a lot of attention to gubernatorial politics, but as far as I know Vilsack never addressed the most important environmental problems facing this state in a meaningful way as governor.</p><p>
Unless he's willing to admit that the way of life in Iowa is a heinous perversion of the way things ought to be, instead of holding onto the myth of a pastoral ethos, he's full of it. &nbsp;It's only possible to think that way until you've seen and smelled this place, and he has seen and smelled it. &nbsp;Construing Iowan ethanol production as good for the environment is dishonest.</p><p>
What I am getting at: the dude ain't for real. &nbsp;All power-plants carbon-free by 2020? &nbsp;Promissory one-upmanship. &nbsp;An all likelihood cynical BS. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let's look at the record...</strong></p><p>I live in Iowa. &nbsp;Trust me, it's not pretty. &nbsp;Ok, I don't pay a lot of attention to gubernatorial politics, but as far as I know Vilsack never addressed the most important environmental problems facing this state in a meaningful way as governor.</p><p>
Unless he's willing to admit that the way of life in Iowa is a heinous perversion of the way things ought to be, instead of holding onto the myth of a pastoral ethos, he's full of it. &nbsp;It's only possible to think that way until you've seen and smelled this place, and he has seen and smelled it. &nbsp;Construing Iowan ethanol production as good for the environment is dishonest.</p><p>
What I am getting at: the dude ain't for real. &nbsp;All power-plants carbon-free by 2020? &nbsp;Promissory one-upmanship. &nbsp;An all likelihood cynical BS. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Ron Steenblik</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:03:59 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That will be $380,000,000,000, please, sir</strong></p><p>Do these guys ever cost out their proposals? Tom Vilsack says nothing in his plan about eliminating the current 51-cents-per-gallon federal tax credit for ethanol, so one must presume that the proposed 25-cents-per-gallon federal tax credit for the production of cellulosic ethanol would be an additional subsidy.</p><p>
Let's assume that President Bush's target 35-billion-gallons-a-year "alternative fuel standard" is met in 2017, and that Presidential candidate Tom Vilsack's 60-billion-gallons-a-year is met by 2030, all by ethanol. (Note: biodiesel attracts an even higher per-gallon subsidy than ethanol.) Assume that corn ethanol will max out at 15 billion gallons a year by 2010, and that all future growth would come from cellulosic ethanol. So, from then on, 15 billion gallons a year would benefit from a $0.51/gallon tax credit, and all the rest from a $0.76/gallon (=$0.51 + $0.25) tax credit.</p><p>
The total cost to the U.S. Treasury -- i.e., taxpayers -- between now and 2030?: <strong>$380 billion</strong>. And the annual subsidy rate by the end of that period would have reached <strong>$41,900,000,000 a year</strong>. Try pulling the plug on that kind of (corporate) welfare once it's in place.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That will be $380,000,000,000, please, sir</strong></p><p>Do these guys ever cost out their proposals? Tom Vilsack says nothing in his plan about eliminating the current 51-cents-per-gallon federal tax credit for ethanol, so one must presume that the proposed 25-cents-per-gallon federal tax credit for the production of cellulosic ethanol would be an additional subsidy.</p><p>
Let's assume that President Bush's target 35-billion-gallons-a-year "alternative fuel standard" is met in 2017, and that Presidential candidate Tom Vilsack's 60-billion-gallons-a-year is met by 2030, all by ethanol. (Note: biodiesel attracts an even higher per-gallon subsidy than ethanol.) Assume that corn ethanol will max out at 15 billion gallons a year by 2010, and that all future growth would come from cellulosic ethanol. So, from then on, 15 billion gallons a year would benefit from a $0.51/gallon tax credit, and all the rest from a $0.76/gallon (=$0.51 + $0.25) tax credit.</p><p>
The total cost to the U.S. Treasury -- i.e., taxpayers -- between now and 2030?: <strong>$380 billion</strong>. And the annual subsidy rate by the end of that period would have reached <strong>$41,900,000,000 a year</strong>. Try pulling the plug on that kind of (corporate) welfare once it's in place.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Nucbuddy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Governor Tom Vilsack on the Nuclear Renaissance<p><a href="http://www.cfr.org/publication/11716/conversation_with_governor_tom_vilsack.html" rel="nofollow">cfr.org/publication/11716/conversation_with_governor_tom_vilsack.html<p>
<b>VILSACK: I did mention <b>nuclear, and I think it's important and necessary for us to have a more enlightened view about that in the long term if we're really--and I think the way we begin that process is by focusing on the environmental benefits, long term, of that strategy<br>
</br></b></b></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Governor Tom Vilsack on the Nuclear Renaissance<p><a href="http://www.cfr.org/publication/11716/conversation_with_governor_tom_vilsack.html" rel="nofollow">cfr.org/publication/11716/conversation_with_governor_tom_vilsack.html<p>
<b>VILSACK: I did mention <b>nuclear, and I think it's important and necessary for us to have a more enlightened view about that in the long term if we're really--and I think the way we begin that process is by focusing on the environmental benefits, long term, of that strategy<br>
</br></b></b></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let My People Go...Vote</strong></p><p><br>
Vilsack's major "contribution" to legislature seems to have been given convicted felons the right to vote.</p><p>
He'd fit right in with Obama and Clinton and pave the way for ground breaking work in letting terrorists and criminals ransack America.<br>


<p>The Texeme Construct offers international text memetics construction and textcasting services.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let My People Go...Vote</strong></p><p><br>
Vilsack's major "contribution" to legislature seems to have been given convicted felons the right to vote.</p><p>
He'd fit right in with Obama and Clinton and pave the way for ground breaking work in letting terrorists and criminals ransack America.<br>


<p>The Texeme Construct offers international text memetics construction and textcasting services.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:13:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/vilsack-comes-out-strong-on-energy/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ron, makes an excellent point<p>Politicians are gas bags. He sees ethanol as a ticket to the white house and is tossing out numbers to the masses who have no idea of the true ramifications.<p>
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." -Mark Twain

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ron, makes an excellent point<p>Politicians are gas bags. He sees ethanol as a ticket to the white house and is tossing out numbers to the masses who have no idea of the true ramifications.<p>
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." -Mark Twain

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>