<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for The pro- and anti-coal contenders on Obama&#8217;s veep shortlist]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Russ</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/veep-impact/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:03:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/veep-impact/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>If these are the choices,</strong></p><p>it should be a no-brainer. &nbsp;</p><p>
By coincidence, I just got around to reading Thomas Frank's nightmarish What's the Matter With Kansas?.</p><p>
Any governor who can stand tall against Big Coal and the morass of slime which always congeals around it, in a place like Kansas, is the kind of person we should be able to trust.</p><p>
(Also, maybe a woman VP nominee will appease these Hillary dead-enders who have been implicitly saying they'd rather see Roe v. Wade overturned than vote for Obama.) &nbsp; </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>If these are the choices,</strong></p><p>it should be a no-brainer. &nbsp;</p><p>
By coincidence, I just got around to reading Thomas Frank's nightmarish What's the Matter With Kansas?.</p><p>
Any governor who can stand tall against Big Coal and the morass of slime which always congeals around it, in a place like Kansas, is the kind of person we should be able to trust.</p><p>
(Also, maybe a woman VP nominee will appease these Hillary dead-enders who have been implicitly saying they'd rather see Roe v. Wade overturned than vote for Obama.) &nbsp; </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Michael Livermore</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/veep-impact/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:53:57 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/veep-impact/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Conventional Pollutants As Well</strong></p><p>In addition to the climate impact of building new powerplants, there are conventional pollutants that have known health and environmental impacts. &nbsp;There is no doubt that the mix of energy production is going to have to change if we are going to deal with climate change -- and act responsibility about conventional pollution. &nbsp;Gov. Sebelius should be commended for her foresight in standing up to special interest and doing what was best for the environmental and economic future of her state.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Conventional Pollutants As Well</strong></p><p>In addition to the climate impact of building new powerplants, there are conventional pollutants that have known health and environmental impacts. &nbsp;There is no doubt that the mix of energy production is going to have to change if we are going to deal with climate change -- and act responsibility about conventional pollution. &nbsp;Gov. Sebelius should be commended for her foresight in standing up to special interest and doing what was best for the environmental and economic future of her state.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by judys50</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/veep-impact/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:44:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/veep-impact/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Obvious as to the choice</strong></p><p>Obviously, Sebelius would be the choice. Anyone who can stand up to the utility companies, would be able to handle herself in Washington or anywhere else for that matter. &nbsp;Also as someone else posted, a woman for VP would soften the blow to Hillary supporters. As far as I am concerned, if Hillary did not make it as a Presidential candidate, we should still support Obama. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Obvious as to the choice</strong></p><p>Obviously, Sebelius would be the choice. Anyone who can stand up to the utility companies, would be able to handle herself in Washington or anywhere else for that matter. &nbsp;Also as someone else posted, a woman for VP would soften the blow to Hillary supporters. As far as I am concerned, if Hillary did not make it as a Presidential candidate, we should still support Obama. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>