<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Likely Obama DOE head talks about climate change and renewable energy]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by BILL HANNAHAN</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/transition-talk-what-chu-want/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:19:21 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/transition-talk-what-chu-want/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Lets convert to metric.<p><br>
3 centigrade degrees = 5.4 Fahrenheit degrees, not 11 degrees Fahrenheit.<p>
Steven Chu &nbsp;interview<br>
"Should fission-based nuclear power plants be made a bigger part of the energy-producing portfolio? <br>
Absolutely. Right now about 20 percent of our power comes from nuclear; there have been no new nuclear plants built since the early '70s."<br>
<a href="http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/10/03_chu.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/10/03_chu.sh ...<p>
Unfortunately the DOE chief serves as an accountant, not an engineer or scientist. The budget is only $25 billion, spent largely on military issues.<p>
<a href="http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/09budget/Content/ApprSum.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/09budget/Content/ApprSum.pd ...<p>
Our energy program is determined by a group of gray haired law school graduates in Washington called Congress.<p>
If we gave him $150 billion per year for the next ten years with instructions to solve the world's energy problems, I believe he could do it.

<p><a href="http://coal2nuclear.com/energy_facts.htm" rel="nofollow">Things Everybody Should Know About Energy</a></p></p></p></a></p></p></a></br></br></br></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Lets convert to metric.<p><br>
3 centigrade degrees = 5.4 Fahrenheit degrees, not 11 degrees Fahrenheit.<p>
Steven Chu &nbsp;interview<br>
"Should fission-based nuclear power plants be made a bigger part of the energy-producing portfolio? <br>
Absolutely. Right now about 20 percent of our power comes from nuclear; there have been no new nuclear plants built since the early '70s."<br>
<a href="http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/10/03_chu.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/10/03_chu.sh ...<p>
Unfortunately the DOE chief serves as an accountant, not an engineer or scientist. The budget is only $25 billion, spent largely on military issues.<p>
<a href="http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/09budget/Content/ApprSum.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfo.doe.gov/budget/09budget/Content/ApprSum.pd ...<p>
Our energy program is determined by a group of gray haired law school graduates in Washington called Congress.<p>
If we gave him $150 billion per year for the next ten years with instructions to solve the world's energy problems, I believe he could do it.

<p><a href="http://coal2nuclear.com/energy_facts.htm" rel="nofollow">Things Everybody Should Know About Energy</a></p></p></p></a></p></p></a></br></br></br></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by anyone</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/transition-talk-what-chu-want/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/transition-talk-what-chu-want/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hopefully he's better in math than Bill<p>Wind is less costly than new nuclear:<br>
This report funded by the nuclear industry states that new nuclear power production costs are between: 8.3 and 11.1 cents/kWh<br>
<a href="http://www.keystone.org/spp/documents/FinalReport_NJFF6_12_2007" rel="nofollow">http://www.keystone.org/spp/documents/FinalReport_NJFF6_1 ...(1).pdf <br>
However this report assumed capital overnight costs of only $2950/kW and new nuclear power plants to be built in Florida already assumed capital costs of over $7000/kW and this at prohibitively long planning and construction times.<br>
<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89169837" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8916 ...<p>
According to the Department of Energy the costs of wind power are between 3 and 6.4 cents per kWh. Average capital costs of Windturbines are $1480/kW (2006).<br>
<a href="http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/41435.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/41435.pdf<br>
South dakota alone has enough wind to power half the US:<br>
<a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/05/14/sdwind/" rel="nofollow">http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/05/14/s ...<p>
No wonder wind capacity is currently growing about 20 times faster than nuclear and has a double digit growth every single year. <a href="http://www.wwindea.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=198&amp;;Itemid=43" rel="nofollow">http://www.wwindea.org/home/index.php?option=com_content& ...<p>
And interconnected Windfarms can provide baseload:<br>
<a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/winds/aj07_jamc.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/winds/aj07_jamc.pdf<p>
Thinfilm photovoltaics will reach costs of below $1000/kW by 2010.<br>
<a href="http://guntherportfolio.blogspot.com/2007/09/oerlikon-solar-almost-at-work-ersol.html" rel="nofollow">http://guntherportfolio.blogspot.com/2007/09/oerlikon-sol ...<br>
120,000 km2 of the US is built. If only 10% of that area has roof area, that leads to a maximum solar flux of 12,000 GW or 1,200 GW at only 10% efficiency.<p>
92 x 92 sq mi (or about 8% of Nevada) is enough to power the entire US with solar thermal alone. <br>
<a href="http://www.ausra.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ausra.com/<p>
HVDC can transmit power from coast to coast with losses of only 3% per 1000 km at costs of &#128;70/kW per 1000 km (transmission line only).<br>
<a href="http://www.abb.com/cawp/GAD02181/C1256D71001E0037C1256834003AF40D.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.abb.com/cawp/GAD02181/C1256D71001E0037C1256834 ...<br>
<a href="http://www.iset.uni-kassel.de/abt/w3-w/projekte/LowCostEuropElSup_revised_for_AKE_2006.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.iset.uni-kassel.de/abt/w3-w/projekte/LowCostEu ...<p>
Not to mention geothermal, biomass, tidal and most importantly: efficiency.</p></a></br></a></br></p></a></br></p></br></a></br></p></a></br></p></a></p></a></br></br></a></br></p></a></br></br></a></br></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hopefully he's better in math than Bill<p>Wind is less costly than new nuclear:<br>
This report funded by the nuclear industry states that new nuclear power production costs are between: 8.3 and 11.1 cents/kWh<br>
<a href="http://www.keystone.org/spp/documents/FinalReport_NJFF6_12_2007" rel="nofollow">http://www.keystone.org/spp/documents/FinalReport_NJFF6_1 ...(1).pdf <br>
However this report assumed capital overnight costs of only $2950/kW and new nuclear power plants to be built in Florida already assumed capital costs of over $7000/kW and this at prohibitively long planning and construction times.<br>
<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89169837" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8916 ...<p>
According to the Department of Energy the costs of wind power are between 3 and 6.4 cents per kWh. Average capital costs of Windturbines are $1480/kW (2006).<br>
<a href="http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/41435.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/41435.pdf<br>
South dakota alone has enough wind to power half the US:<br>
<a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/05/14/sdwind/" rel="nofollow">http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/05/14/s ...<p>
No wonder wind capacity is currently growing about 20 times faster than nuclear and has a double digit growth every single year. <a href="http://www.wwindea.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=198&amp;;Itemid=43" rel="nofollow">http://www.wwindea.org/home/index.php?option=com_content& ...<p>
And interconnected Windfarms can provide baseload:<br>
<a href="http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/winds/aj07_jamc.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/winds/aj07_jamc.pdf<p>
Thinfilm photovoltaics will reach costs of below $1000/kW by 2010.<br>
<a href="http://guntherportfolio.blogspot.com/2007/09/oerlikon-solar-almost-at-work-ersol.html" rel="nofollow">http://guntherportfolio.blogspot.com/2007/09/oerlikon-sol ...<br>
120,000 km2 of the US is built. If only 10% of that area has roof area, that leads to a maximum solar flux of 12,000 GW or 1,200 GW at only 10% efficiency.<p>
92 x 92 sq mi (or about 8% of Nevada) is enough to power the entire US with solar thermal alone. <br>
<a href="http://www.ausra.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ausra.com/<p>
HVDC can transmit power from coast to coast with losses of only 3% per 1000 km at costs of &#128;70/kW per 1000 km (transmission line only).<br>
<a href="http://www.abb.com/cawp/GAD02181/C1256D71001E0037C1256834003AF40D.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.abb.com/cawp/GAD02181/C1256D71001E0037C1256834 ...<br>
<a href="http://www.iset.uni-kassel.de/abt/w3-w/projekte/LowCostEuropElSup_revised_for_AKE_2006.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.iset.uni-kassel.de/abt/w3-w/projekte/LowCostEu ...<p>
Not to mention geothermal, biomass, tidal and most importantly: efficiency.</p></a></br></a></br></p></a></br></p></br></a></br></p></a></br></p></a></p></a></br></br></a></br></p></a></br></br></a></br></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>