<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Umbra on recycled toilet paper]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by RSilberblatter</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:59:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>other non-chafing options<p>Hey All, wanted to point out that my office uses either Seventh Generation recycled toilet paper or Marcal, and neither band is nasty. However, if Jennifer needs more recycled options (try em all, why not): CVS Bathroom Tissue 1000, Cascades, Natural Value, Earth First, Trader Joe's, and 365 Everyday Value. <a href="http://www.kleercut.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.kleercut.net has more brands of all sorts of recycled paper products. Also, perhaps people would be interested in emailing Thomas Falk, C.E.O of Kimberly-Clark, the company that makes its toilet paper with fiber from ancient forests (and makes us turn to the "nasty" brands). Check out <a href="http://kleercut.net/en/sendtokc" rel="nofollow">http://kleercut.net/en/sendtokc for more information.<br>
</br></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>other non-chafing options<p>Hey All, wanted to point out that my office uses either Seventh Generation recycled toilet paper or Marcal, and neither band is nasty. However, if Jennifer needs more recycled options (try em all, why not): CVS Bathroom Tissue 1000, Cascades, Natural Value, Earth First, Trader Joe's, and 365 Everyday Value. <a href="http://www.kleercut.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.kleercut.net has more brands of all sorts of recycled paper products. Also, perhaps people would be interested in emailing Thomas Falk, C.E.O of Kimberly-Clark, the company that makes its toilet paper with fiber from ancient forests (and makes us turn to the "nasty" brands). Check out <a href="http://kleercut.net/en/sendtokc" rel="nofollow">http://kleercut.net/en/sendtokc for more information.<br>
</br></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Tom Twigg</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:29:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let us not get distracted ...</strong></p><p>from the real important [t]issue here ... should it hang down the back or over the front?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let us not get distracted ...</strong></p><p>from the real important [t]issue here ... should it hang down the back or over the front?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Sarah K. Burkhalter</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:06:33 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No contest</strong></p><p>Front.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No contest</strong></p><p>Front.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Pandu</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:13:16 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>lota</strong></p><p>What's the need for paper? &nbsp;A small jug of water works better.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>lota</strong></p><p>What's the need for paper? &nbsp;A small jug of water works better.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by organicqueso</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:44:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Do not use facial tissue</strong></p><p>Ever notice how when you use toilet paper when you sneeze, it rips apart? There's a reason for that.</p><p>
According to wikipedia (and my dad):</p><p>
"Toilet paper, which differs in composition from facial tissue, is designed to deteriorate when wet in order to keep drain pipes clear. Some types of toilet paper are designed to decompose in septic tanks, while other bathroom and facial tissues do not. Most septic tank manufacturers advise against using paper products that are non-septic tank safe."</p><p>
Using facial tissue, even if it is recycled, is a very poor suggestion! Something is definitely not green if it causes damage to your plumbing and septic system.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Do not use facial tissue</strong></p><p>Ever notice how when you use toilet paper when you sneeze, it rips apart? There's a reason for that.</p><p>
According to wikipedia (and my dad):</p><p>
"Toilet paper, which differs in composition from facial tissue, is designed to deteriorate when wet in order to keep drain pipes clear. Some types of toilet paper are designed to decompose in septic tanks, while other bathroom and facial tissues do not. Most septic tank manufacturers advise against using paper products that are non-septic tank safe."</p><p>
Using facial tissue, even if it is recycled, is a very poor suggestion! Something is definitely not green if it causes damage to your plumbing and septic system.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by kmp</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:57:28 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Green Forest<p>I usually use Seventh Generation (which I find fine and not scratchy) but they did not have it at the store the other day so I bought <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Green-Forest-Unscented-Bathroom-Recycled/dp/B000F4Z84Y" rel="nofollow">Green Forest.<p>
I have to say it was <strong>really soft and comparable to your basic Charmin.<p>
I'll stick with Seventh Gen, as it has higher post-consumer recycled percentage (80% vs 40%), but if softness is your issue, try out Green Forest. <p>
&nbsp; </p></p></strong></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Green Forest<p>I usually use Seventh Generation (which I find fine and not scratchy) but they did not have it at the store the other day so I bought <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Green-Forest-Unscented-Bathroom-Recycled/dp/B000F4Z84Y" rel="nofollow">Green Forest.<p>
I have to say it was <strong>really soft and comparable to your basic Charmin.<p>
I'll stick with Seventh Gen, as it has higher post-consumer recycled percentage (80% vs 40%), but if softness is your issue, try out Green Forest. <p>
&nbsp; </p></p></strong></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by GreenEngineer</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:04:50 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>other options<p>Or you can radically reduce your TP usage by getting a bidet and cleaning with water rather than scratchy paper.<p>
I've used the <a href="http://www.bidet.com/bidematic.htm" rel="nofollow">Bidetmaticat home for years, and it works really well. &nbsp;It does take some getting used to, but it's actually much more comfortable than paper, and reduced TP usage dramatically.<p>
As for concerns about increased water usage: paper manufacture is a very water-intensive and water-polluting process. &nbsp;I don't have the figures in front of me, but I would bet that you use more water, indirectly, with TP than with a bidet.<br>
</br></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>other options<p>Or you can radically reduce your TP usage by getting a bidet and cleaning with water rather than scratchy paper.<p>
I've used the <a href="http://www.bidet.com/bidematic.htm" rel="nofollow">Bidetmaticat home for years, and it works really well. &nbsp;It does take some getting used to, but it's actually much more comfortable than paper, and reduced TP usage dramatically.<p>
As for concerns about increased water usage: paper manufacture is a very water-intensive and water-polluting process. &nbsp;I don't have the figures in front of me, but I would bet that you use more water, indirectly, with TP than with a bidet.<br>
</br></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by mihan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:52:36 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>duh</strong></p><p>Front.</p><p>
Although either way, my cat pulls it all down, so the TP in my house has to sit on the counter.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>duh</strong></p><p>Front.</p><p>
Although either way, my cat pulls it all down, so the TP in my house has to sit on the counter.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by monkeydrumming</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tp/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:14:19 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tp/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A possible solution</strong></p><p>You could always go live in another country for a while. I spent a few years in eastern Europe and got totally used to some 'extreme' situations - like using newspaper, or old books ("take that, socialist realist literature!") Anyway, you'll come back and find that the recycled tp isn't bad at all. Now I like it way more than the poofy pillow stuffing brands. </p><p>
(I alternate rolls: one front and then one back. Keeps everyone happy.)</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A possible solution</strong></p><p>You could always go live in another country for a while. I spent a few years in eastern Europe and got totally used to some 'extreme' situations - like using newspaper, or old books ("take that, socialist realist literature!") Anyway, you'll come back and find that the recycled tp isn't bad at all. Now I like it way more than the poofy pillow stuffing brands. </p><p>
(I alternate rolls: one front and then one back. Keeps everyone happy.)</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>