<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Our right to know about fuel-efficient tires]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by archigeek</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:57:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A ban?</strong></p><p>A ban? A ban!!!? A freaking ban!!!!? That's one of the stupidest things I've heard Congress enact, and that's saying something. 

<p>The mellotron is your friend.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A ban?</strong></p><p>A ban? A ban!!!? A freaking ban!!!!? That's one of the stupidest things I've heard Congress enact, and that's saying something. 

<p>The mellotron is your friend.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Bob Wallace</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 01:18:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Check the years...</strong></p><p>1996 and the Far Right is running Congress.</p><p>
Remember that extremists gained partial control of the US even before Oil took over the Administration.</p><p>
Here's hoping that we've turned back toward a better future for those who follow us....</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Check the years...</strong></p><p>1996 and the Far Right is running Congress.</p><p>
Remember that extremists gained partial control of the US even before Oil took over the Administration.</p><p>
Here's hoping that we've turned back toward a better future for those who follow us....</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Angelsnecropolis</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:53:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Twheel</strong></p><p>I'm still in disbelief regarding the development of the twheel. I had read that R&amp;D won't be completed until 2016. </p><p>
Seriously. How much freakin R&amp;D is needed for a better tire that takes 10 years?! Ridiculous.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Twheel</strong></p><p>I'm still in disbelief regarding the development of the twheel. I had read that R&amp;D won't be completed until 2016. </p><p>
Seriously. How much freakin R&amp;D is needed for a better tire that takes 10 years?! Ridiculous.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by nycowboy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:46:53 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tired-of-waiting-for-efficiency/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What's Wrong with Information?</strong></p><p>I can understand that it's a bad idea to buy a tire solely on fuel-efficiency, but why not provide that information with others like how long the tire lasts (on average), how well it holds up under panic stops, it's traction off-road in mud and snow, and so forth.</p><p>
The demands of the die-hard off-roader or the person who lives in the mountains with a 4x4 truck is going to be different then the daily commuter. One is going to want an more aggressive tread, and probably won't care much about the trade-off. The commuter, in Florida, most likely only will care about the longevity of the tire, and the fuel efficiency. </p><p>
We are grown ups. We can use information responsibly.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What's Wrong with Information?</strong></p><p>I can understand that it's a bad idea to buy a tire solely on fuel-efficiency, but why not provide that information with others like how long the tire lasts (on average), how well it holds up under panic stops, it's traction off-road in mud and snow, and so forth.</p><p>
The demands of the die-hard off-roader or the person who lives in the mountains with a 4x4 truck is going to be different then the daily commuter. One is going to want an more aggressive tread, and probably won't care much about the trade-off. The commuter, in Florida, most likely only will care about the longevity of the tire, and the fuel efficiency. </p><p>
We are grown ups. We can use information responsibly.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>