<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for This blew a few of my circuits]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by scatter</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/this-blew-a-few-of-my-circuits/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:52:55 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/this-blew-a-few-of-my-circuits/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>TED is great<p><a href="http://www.ted.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>TED is great<p><a href="http://www.ted.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Bart Anderson</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/this-blew-a-few-of-my-circuits/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:56:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/this-blew-a-few-of-my-circuits/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great graphics.... not sure about the logic<p>Great graphics. And cheers for Rosling's point at the end about the existence of untapped pools of data. Getting access to this data in an understandable <b>is critical to being able to deal with global problems.<p>
The first part of the lecture, though, is an impressive demonstration of ... I'm not exactly sure what. Rosling shows data in a whizzy way, and throws in generalizations as data points dance across the screen. &nbsp;It could be true, it could be misleading. There's no way of telling.<p>
For some reason, I have the feeling that I'm being sold a bill of goods (I think Rosling is a proponent of globalization). I would like to see his assumptions made explicit -- for example he apparently uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmic_scale" rel="nofollow">logarithmic scales for wealth and income -- which minimizes our perception of inequality.<p>
Flash is no subsitute for logical thought and analysis. At most, it can show results in a dramatic way.<p>
Hans Rosling has some interesting comments on his blog: <p>
<a href="http://roslingsblogger.blogspot.com/2007/09/global-health-back-on-track.html" rel="nofollow"> &nbsp; Global Health back on track! (September 06, 2007)On 5 September history was made by 7 Ministers of Health from low-income countries together with serious politicians from West Europe and representatives from aid organisations that had learnt their lessons . The group launched the <a href="http://www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/ihp/default.asp" rel="nofollow">International Health Partnership.<p>
If aid from rich countries should effectively improve health of the poor, they said, the aid must be:<br>


coordinated,<br>
focused on improving health systems as a whole instead of one disease at a time,<br>
and part of good national plans.<p>


These statements are evidance based, much needed but "un-sexy". So let me translate the 3 statements into blunt words...  <a href="http://roslingsblogger.blogspot.com/2005/11/five-thoughts-at-same-time.html" rel="nofollow"> Five thoughts at the same time (November 30, 2005)  ... &nbsp;An evidence base world view requires five thoughts at the same time:<br>


World is getting better and better,<br>
but at the cost of climate change,<br>
and billions still live miserable lives in poverty<br>
and in the last decade life got worse for 100 of millions,<br>
but as the world is stupidly managed, we have many opportunities to fix the world for the grandkids!  Related: <br>


<a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/92" rel="nofollow">Original lecture at TED.<br>
<a href="http://roslingsblogger.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Hans Rosling's blog<br>
<a href="http://www.gapminder.org/" rel="nofollow">Gapminder (Rosling's software company)<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_visualization" rel="nofollow">Scientific visualization (Wiki)<br>
<a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/index" rel="nofollow">Edward Tufte's - another pioneer in the visualization of data 

<p>Bart<br>
<a href="http://energybulletin.net" rel="nofollow">Energy Bulletin</a></br></p></a></br></a></br></a></br></a></br></a></br></br></br></br></br></br></a></p></br></br></br></p></a></a></p></p></p></a></p></p></b></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great graphics.... not sure about the logic<p>Great graphics. And cheers for Rosling's point at the end about the existence of untapped pools of data. Getting access to this data in an understandable <b>is critical to being able to deal with global problems.<p>
The first part of the lecture, though, is an impressive demonstration of ... I'm not exactly sure what. Rosling shows data in a whizzy way, and throws in generalizations as data points dance across the screen. &nbsp;It could be true, it could be misleading. There's no way of telling.<p>
For some reason, I have the feeling that I'm being sold a bill of goods (I think Rosling is a proponent of globalization). I would like to see his assumptions made explicit -- for example he apparently uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmic_scale" rel="nofollow">logarithmic scales for wealth and income -- which minimizes our perception of inequality.<p>
Flash is no subsitute for logical thought and analysis. At most, it can show results in a dramatic way.<p>
Hans Rosling has some interesting comments on his blog: <p>
<a href="http://roslingsblogger.blogspot.com/2007/09/global-health-back-on-track.html" rel="nofollow"> &nbsp; Global Health back on track! (September 06, 2007)On 5 September history was made by 7 Ministers of Health from low-income countries together with serious politicians from West Europe and representatives from aid organisations that had learnt their lessons . The group launched the <a href="http://www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/ihp/default.asp" rel="nofollow">International Health Partnership.<p>
If aid from rich countries should effectively improve health of the poor, they said, the aid must be:<br>


coordinated,<br>
focused on improving health systems as a whole instead of one disease at a time,<br>
and part of good national plans.<p>


These statements are evidance based, much needed but "un-sexy". So let me translate the 3 statements into blunt words...  <a href="http://roslingsblogger.blogspot.com/2005/11/five-thoughts-at-same-time.html" rel="nofollow"> Five thoughts at the same time (November 30, 2005)  ... &nbsp;An evidence base world view requires five thoughts at the same time:<br>


World is getting better and better,<br>
but at the cost of climate change,<br>
and billions still live miserable lives in poverty<br>
and in the last decade life got worse for 100 of millions,<br>
but as the world is stupidly managed, we have many opportunities to fix the world for the grandkids!  Related: <br>


<a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/92" rel="nofollow">Original lecture at TED.<br>
<a href="http://roslingsblogger.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Hans Rosling's blog<br>
<a href="http://www.gapminder.org/" rel="nofollow">Gapminder (Rosling's software company)<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_visualization" rel="nofollow">Scientific visualization (Wiki)<br>
<a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/index" rel="nofollow">Edward Tufte's - another pioneer in the visualization of data 

<p>Bart<br>
<a href="http://energybulletin.net" rel="nofollow">Energy Bulletin</a></br></p></a></br></a></br></a></br></a></br></a></br></br></br></br></br></br></a></p></br></br></br></p></a></a></p></p></p></a></p></p></b></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by odograph</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/this-blew-a-few-of-my-circuits/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:21:27 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/this-blew-a-few-of-my-circuits/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>TED audio/video<p>I love TED too. &nbsp;I've listened to a number of the MP3s on my walks.<p>
<a href="http://www.listeningtowords.com/location.php?id=2" rel="nofollow">more here</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>TED audio/video<p>I love TED too. &nbsp;I've listened to a number of the MP3s on my walks.<p>
<a href="http://www.listeningtowords.com/location.php?id=2" rel="nofollow">more here</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>