<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Chock full of good news ... ha ha ...]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Storm Dragon</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:40:07 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What about the ivory-billed woodpecker?</strong></p><p>I think that the re-discovery of the ivory-billed woodpecker, long believed to be extinct, is a story of major importance. &nbsp;With all the disasters and gloomy predictions we hear these days, we need to be given some cause for hope, and a reason to celebrate.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What about the ivory-billed woodpecker?</strong></p><p>I think that the re-discovery of the ivory-billed woodpecker, long believed to be extinct, is a story of major importance. &nbsp;With all the disasters and gloomy predictions we hear these days, we need to be given some cause for hope, and a reason to celebrate.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by bxlamann</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:45:30 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Environmental Stories</strong></p><p>In my opinion, human overpopulation is the single most detrimental factor to the world's rapidly declining natural environment. One never sees that mentioned in mainstream headlines though. Women worldwide should give birth to no more than two children each, and then only if they can afford to raise those children without financial or other assistance. There is no longer a reason to "go forth and multiply." In fact, it is primarily because of our success at procreation that this planet is in such sad shape now. And things will only get worse as more people require more goods, defile more resources and create more pollution. Birth control is widely available; we need to use it!</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Environmental Stories</strong></p><p>In my opinion, human overpopulation is the single most detrimental factor to the world's rapidly declining natural environment. One never sees that mentioned in mainstream headlines though. Women worldwide should give birth to no more than two children each, and then only if they can afford to raise those children without financial or other assistance. There is no longer a reason to "go forth and multiply." In fact, it is primarily because of our success at procreation that this planet is in such sad shape now. And things will only get worse as more people require more goods, defile more resources and create more pollution. Birth control is widely available; we need to use it!</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by tortuga76</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 02:53:48 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>overpopulation</strong></p><p>while i agree wholeheartedly w/your comment that overpopulation is a major concern, i must take issue w/how you phrase it, saying that 'Women worldwide should give birth to no more than two children each,' implying that women are always the ones in control of how many kids they have. &nbsp;how i wish that were so! &nbsp;i think the majority of women would LOVE to be the ones making all their reproduction decisions, but as we know, sadly, that is not the case. &nbsp;policy makers need to realize this and help women take more control of their personal destinies, and their bodies.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>overpopulation</strong></p><p>while i agree wholeheartedly w/your comment that overpopulation is a major concern, i must take issue w/how you phrase it, saying that 'Women worldwide should give birth to no more than two children each,' implying that women are always the ones in control of how many kids they have. &nbsp;how i wish that were so! &nbsp;i think the majority of women would LOVE to be the ones making all their reproduction decisions, but as we know, sadly, that is not the case. &nbsp;policy makers need to realize this and help women take more control of their personal destinies, and their bodies.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by cdmiller</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:08:29 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cure for overpopulation</strong></p><p>The cure for overpopulation, sometimes reviled by enviros, is to start moving the human race off planet. &nbsp;If this does not happen quickly enough only mass slaughter, be it by war, disease, famine, etc. will ease human population pressure and it's effects on the planet.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cure for overpopulation</strong></p><p>The cure for overpopulation, sometimes reviled by enviros, is to start moving the human race off planet. &nbsp;If this does not happen quickly enough only mass slaughter, be it by war, disease, famine, etc. will ease human population pressure and it's effects on the planet.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by sukumar</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:05:44 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>success at procreation and human overpopulation</strong></p><p>I doubt that our birth rates have increased significantly over the ages. It is rather our success at delaying death through better health care (lowering infant mortality and increasing life expectancy), technological mastery over nature (however temporary) and perhaps even fewer wars! (without a correspondingly drastic decrease in birth rates) that is responsible for human overpopulation. This is not a headline event for the year 2005, but &nbsp;arguably it could be the story of the century or the millenium.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>success at procreation and human overpopulation</strong></p><p>I doubt that our birth rates have increased significantly over the ages. It is rather our success at delaying death through better health care (lowering infant mortality and increasing life expectancy), technological mastery over nature (however temporary) and perhaps even fewer wars! (without a correspondingly drastic decrease in birth rates) that is responsible for human overpopulation. This is not a headline event for the year 2005, but &nbsp;arguably it could be the story of the century or the millenium.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by lizabelle</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:39:38 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Environmental Stories</strong></p><p>You're right all these stories reached me by using my approach to "news" not paying attention to it. This year I plan to pay more attention with the help of Grist. Thank you!

<p>Resourceful Writer</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Environmental Stories</strong></p><p>You're right all these stories reached me by using my approach to "news" not paying attention to it. This year I plan to pay more attention with the help of Grist. Thank you!

<p>Resourceful Writer</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by jshore</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:23:15 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great summary!</strong></p><p>I think you hit the nail on the head with what the larger lesson from Katrina is.</p><p>
And, similarly with your point about ANWR...Indeed, the symbolic stakes are high. &nbsp;It is not so much this particular place but what it represents particularly in terms of whether we are going to continue to coddle to our fossil fuel addiction or whether we will instead deal with energy issues in a more comprehensive way that recognizes the connection with climate change, etc.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great summary!</strong></p><p>I think you hit the nail on the head with what the larger lesson from Katrina is.</p><p>
And, similarly with your point about ANWR...Indeed, the symbolic stakes are high. &nbsp;It is not so much this particular place but what it represents particularly in terms of whether we are going to continue to coddle to our fossil fuel addiction or whether we will instead deal with energy issues in a more comprehensive way that recognizes the connection with climate change, etc.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by drew03</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-top-five-environmental-stories-of-2005/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>One more big one...<p>Another huge story (and victory) of 2005 was the defeat of Congressman Pombo's mining provision that would have led to a massive sell-off of our public lands.<p>
Well, now Bush is at it...his budget proposes an unprecedented $1 BILLION sell-off of National Forest and BLM land.<p>
Do something about it now:<p>
<a href="http://action.wilderness.org/campaign/selloff" rel="nofollow">http://action.wilderness.org/campaign/selloff<br>
</br></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>One more big one...<p>Another huge story (and victory) of 2005 was the defeat of Congressman Pombo's mining provision that would have led to a massive sell-off of our public lands.<p>
Well, now Bush is at it...his budget proposes an unprecedented $1 BILLION sell-off of National Forest and BLM land.<p>
Do something about it now:<p>
<a href="http://action.wilderness.org/campaign/selloff" rel="nofollow">http://action.wilderness.org/campaign/selloff<br>
</br></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>