<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Why electricity is the energy carrier of choice]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:29:11 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Greens Exposed!</strong></p><p>It's become clear to me that the "Greens" are not protectors of the environment, but protectors of the electric companies.</p><p>
They love electric cars, and hybrids, because their masters (the wind-solar combine) will profit mightily.</p><p>
They hate hydrogen because it reduces demand for solar panels and wind turbines and reduces dependence on electricity from the grid. &nbsp;It encourages independence and delivers more wealth to the people, so the Greens don't like hydrogen.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Greens Exposed!</strong></p><p>It's become clear to me that the "Greens" are not protectors of the environment, but protectors of the electric companies.</p><p>
They love electric cars, and hybrids, because their masters (the wind-solar combine) will profit mightily.</p><p>
They hate hydrogen because it reduces demand for solar panels and wind turbines and reduces dependence on electricity from the grid. &nbsp;It encourages independence and delivers more wealth to the people, so the Greens don't like hydrogen.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by vakibs</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:53:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>greens love jabailo<p>... for his charming wit, intelligent analysis and his passion of finding Hydrogen as the source of life in all the posts. <p>
Like the solitary electron which revolves around the Hydrogen nucleus, jabailo keeps revolving around the topic. Which direction of spin do you have, jabailo ? <p>
Is it true that we cannot know your velocity and momentum at the same time ? <p>
Are you a particle or a wave, jabailo ? <p>
A grist without jabailo will not be a happy grist. 

<p>Let's think in terms of <a href="http://the-redpill.blogspot.com/2008/08/eco-dollar-future-global-currency.html" rel="nofollow">eco-dollars.</a></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>greens love jabailo<p>... for his charming wit, intelligent analysis and his passion of finding Hydrogen as the source of life in all the posts. <p>
Like the solitary electron which revolves around the Hydrogen nucleus, jabailo keeps revolving around the topic. Which direction of spin do you have, jabailo ? <p>
Is it true that we cannot know your velocity and momentum at the same time ? <p>
Are you a particle or a wave, jabailo ? <p>
A grist without jabailo will not be a happy grist. 

<p>Let's think in terms of <a href="http://the-redpill.blogspot.com/2008/08/eco-dollar-future-global-currency.html" rel="nofollow">eco-dollars.</a></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:58:35 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The light side of the force</strong></p><p>Electricity for motors yes, for heat not so easy to see. &nbsp;Solar power will cost $1/Watt(e) and solar heat $0.20/Watt(t).</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The light side of the force</strong></p><p>Electricity for motors yes, for heat not so easy to see. &nbsp;Solar power will cost $1/Watt(e) and solar heat $0.20/Watt(t).</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:22:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Admittedly, he is filling a niche<p>in the village of Grist.<p>
How hydrogen would reduce the demand for solar and wind is beyond me. But then, I'm not all that bright.<br>


<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Admittedly, he is filling a niche<p>in the village of Grist.<p>
How hydrogen would reduce the demand for solar and wind is beyond me. But then, I'm not all that bright.<br>


<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Jonas</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:36:23 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No modifications of infrastructures</strong></p><p>In some cases, you don't even need to modify infrastructures at all, you can just use the existing ones.</p><p>
For example, it is very difficult to co-fire large amounts of biomass with coal - 5 to 10% seems to be a practical limit. The wet dream of the renewable energy sector would be to find a way to replace all coal in existing coal plants. </p><p>
And voil&#224;, some smart scientists have already come up with a technology capable of doing so. It's called torrefaction, a highly efficient conversion and densification process which results in a renewable fuel that can replace 100% of coal in existing infrastructures (not only the boilers, but the entire existing logistical, storage and processing infrastructures can be used).</p><p>
So all the anti-renewables talk based on the idea that there are no cost-effective or efficient baseloads, are nonsensical. It's perfectly feasible to create such green baseloads, which can serve to make the intermittent renewables independent of coal and gas. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No modifications of infrastructures</strong></p><p>In some cases, you don't even need to modify infrastructures at all, you can just use the existing ones.</p><p>
For example, it is very difficult to co-fire large amounts of biomass with coal - 5 to 10% seems to be a practical limit. The wet dream of the renewable energy sector would be to find a way to replace all coal in existing coal plants. </p><p>
And voil&#224;, some smart scientists have already come up with a technology capable of doing so. It's called torrefaction, a highly efficient conversion and densification process which results in a renewable fuel that can replace 100% of coal in existing infrastructures (not only the boilers, but the entire existing logistical, storage and processing infrastructures can be used).</p><p>
So all the anti-renewables talk based on the idea that there are no cost-effective or efficient baseloads, are nonsensical. It's perfectly feasible to create such green baseloads, which can serve to make the intermittent renewables independent of coal and gas. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by Michael Hoexter</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:35:14 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen is parasitic on the electron economies</strong></p><p>Jabailo is expressing a very naive view of what hydrogen is in discussions of energy. &nbsp;Hydrogen as an energy carrier, at least in its clean and supposedly promising forms, needs renewably generated electricity. &nbsp;But it will yield 2/3rds less usable energy than using electricity directly or storing electricity in a battery. &nbsp;So if we used a lot of hydrogen we would have much more of a need for wind turbines, solar panels and the services of electric utilities. &nbsp;We would need 2.5 to 3 times as much clean generation capacity to power the same amount of transport than if we used electricity as the energy carrier. &nbsp;</p><p>
I'm surprised that there are people still out there (posting on this blog) with this lack of understanding of how hydrogen works. &nbsp;</p><p>
The hydrogen that is available now is mostly a byproduct of the oil refining process and is such not very "clean".</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen is parasitic on the electron economies</strong></p><p>Jabailo is expressing a very naive view of what hydrogen is in discussions of energy. &nbsp;Hydrogen as an energy carrier, at least in its clean and supposedly promising forms, needs renewably generated electricity. &nbsp;But it will yield 2/3rds less usable energy than using electricity directly or storing electricity in a battery. &nbsp;So if we used a lot of hydrogen we would have much more of a need for wind turbines, solar panels and the services of electric utilities. &nbsp;We would need 2.5 to 3 times as much clean generation capacity to power the same amount of transport than if we used electricity as the energy carrier. &nbsp;</p><p>
I'm surprised that there are people still out there (posting on this blog) with this lack of understanding of how hydrogen works. &nbsp;</p><p>
The hydrogen that is available now is mostly a byproduct of the oil refining process and is such not very "clean".</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by MAD MAC</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:11:56 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-renewable-electron-economy-part-6/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Are you saying the Sun is an energy carrier?</strong></p><p>Because I thought the sun derived it's enormous energy output from Hydrogen. Which would mean all solar energy is hydrogen energy.

<p>Victory in Pattani</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Are you saying the Sun is an energy carrier?</strong></p><p>Because I thought the sun derived it's enormous energy output from Hydrogen. Which would mean all solar energy is hydrogen energy.

<p>Victory in Pattani</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>