<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Dems try to advance climate and energy bills; Repubs work to block them]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Pathos</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-latest-in-congressional-maneuvering/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:33:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-latest-in-congressional-maneuvering/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The one thing we can do about this...</strong></p><p>Inhofe's up for reelection next year.</p><p>
Give money to pro-environment candidates in 2008.</p><p>
Or to <strong>any</strong> candidate running against someone like Inhofe.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The one thing we can do about this...</strong></p><p>Inhofe's up for reelection next year.</p><p>
Give money to pro-environment candidates in 2008.</p><p>
Or to <strong>any</strong> candidate running against someone like Inhofe.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by jptrenn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-latest-in-congressional-maneuvering/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:15:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-latest-in-congressional-maneuvering/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Here's a way to support the bill<p>David<p>
You feel as strong about this as I do. &nbsp;I'm part of a group that's working to make sure that the bill is passed. &nbsp;It's been 22 years since we've had a CAFE increase - ridiculous! &nbsp;Right now it's at 27.5. &nbsp;We're hoping to see it go up to 35 over 13 years...quite achievable. &nbsp;<p>
We're also hoping the renewable electricity standard (RES)go up to 15%. &nbsp;Basically that means that our country get 15% of its electricity from renewable sources. &nbsp;With global warming, the cost of gas, and unstable oil sources, it only makes sense.<p>
You're right. &nbsp;Corporations and their lobbyists are working to block it. &nbsp;That's why we've got a petition up at <a href="http://www.energybill2007.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.energybill2007.us<p>
I hope you'll sing it and tell others.</p></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Here's a way to support the bill<p>David<p>
You feel as strong about this as I do. &nbsp;I'm part of a group that's working to make sure that the bill is passed. &nbsp;It's been 22 years since we've had a CAFE increase - ridiculous! &nbsp;Right now it's at 27.5. &nbsp;We're hoping to see it go up to 35 over 13 years...quite achievable. &nbsp;<p>
We're also hoping the renewable electricity standard (RES)go up to 15%. &nbsp;Basically that means that our country get 15% of its electricity from renewable sources. &nbsp;With global warming, the cost of gas, and unstable oil sources, it only makes sense.<p>
You're right. &nbsp;Corporations and their lobbyists are working to block it. &nbsp;That's why we've got a petition up at <a href="http://www.energybill2007.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.energybill2007.us<p>
I hope you'll sing it and tell others.</p></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-latest-in-congressional-maneuvering/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:21:05 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-latest-in-congressional-maneuvering/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Global Taxes, versus not<p><br>
It comes down to this:<p>
a. Scare mongerers who want to use AGW to increase our taxes<p>
vs.<p>
b. People who realize we're in the midst of an Al Gore inspired witch hunt, and that if we delay enough "cooler" heads will prevail.<p>
It's a bad picture all around for science, and for rationality, as the enviro-crazies have gone Salem on us.

<p>John Bailo<br>
<a href="http://sutext.texeme.com" rel="nofollow">Sutext:</a></br></p></p></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Global Taxes, versus not<p><br>
It comes down to this:<p>
a. Scare mongerers who want to use AGW to increase our taxes<p>
vs.<p>
b. People who realize we're in the midst of an Al Gore inspired witch hunt, and that if we delay enough "cooler" heads will prevail.<p>
It's a bad picture all around for science, and for rationality, as the enviro-crazies have gone Salem on us.

<p>John Bailo<br>
<a href="http://sutext.texeme.com" rel="nofollow">Sutext:</a></br></p></p></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>