<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Gwyn Prins and Steve Rayner on climate change]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by Werdna http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/ Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:22:21 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/1 But why did they sign it?

Yes, they may not be skeptical, but that begs the question...

Why did they sign Inhofe's document?

Andrew Eisenberg
The gateway project is wrong---http://www.livableregion.ca


]]> But why did they sign it?

Yes, they may not be skeptical, but that begs the question...

Why did they sign Inhofe's document?

Andrew Eisenberg
The gateway project is wrong---http://www.livableregion.ca


]]> Comment #2 by Andrew Dessler http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/ Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:45:12 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/2 You're joking, right?

You think that this is a statement that the people on the list signed?  I assure you it's not.  It's just a list of people put together by the Senate committee.  I'd be willing to bet that some people on the list don't even know they're listed.

]]> You're joking, right?

You think that this is a statement that the people on the list signed?  I assure you it's not.  It's just a list of people put together by the Senate committee.  I'd be willing to bet that some people on the list don't even know they're listed.

]]> Comment #3 by roberte http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/ Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:10:50 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/3 'signing'

It isn't a report in the sense that research was done and some synthesis of the ideas developed.  It is basically a list of quotes - "details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007" Minority Page .

And the places stuff was quoted from is pretty motley.

]]> 'signing'

It isn't a report in the sense that research was done and some synthesis of the ideas developed.  It is basically a list of quotes - "details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007" Minority Page .

And the places stuff was quoted from is pretty motley.

]]> Comment #4 by angliss http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/ Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:43:17 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/the-inhofe-400-skeptic-of-the-day1/4 Other categories

Having read the entire list pretty closely, there's a few other categories you'll find too:

a) qualified people who are OK with the idea of AGW but don't think the IPCC got it right.
b) qualified people who are skeptical of AGW en toto.
c) qualified people who have issues with the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth".

It's a sorry reflection on our society that Gore's efforts went pretty much nowhere until a movie came out as a supplement to his book by the same name.

]]> Other categories

Having read the entire list pretty closely, there's a few other categories you'll find too:

a) qualified people who are OK with the idea of AGW but don't think the IPCC got it right.
b) qualified people who are skeptical of AGW en toto.
c) qualified people who have issues with the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth".

It's a sorry reflection on our society that Gore's efforts went pretty much nowhere until a movie came out as a supplement to his book by the same name.

]]>