I enjoy it always, but Harry Potter messes me up when the young man has no shirt, but hair on his stomach. He is just a baby(Daniel Radcliffe).
I am too old but much, much too innocent for the internet. And movies, too, I reckon.
Bonnie/bonyelle

Perhaps now instead of awarding scientists prestige for true research, hypothesis and data gathering,we can now have people come up on stage and pontificate about Al Gore's crackpot ideas.

People who "always wanted to be a scientist" can come try out.   Hint: Al Gore will be a judge, so use the word "anthropomorphic" in your audition.

Paul Abdul will also judge...since it would take a drunk to sit through all the eco-wannabes whining about how Blizzards are due to CO2 based warming.

Hint: Al Gore will be a judge, so use the word "anthropomorphic" in your audition.

Do you mean "anthropogenic"?

From Dictionary.com: Anthropomorphic - ascribing human form or attributes to a being or thing not human, esp. to a deity.

Jabailo, you're not bright, but you're keeping me interested.

I know that you have something against people who are not scientists voicing opinions about climate change. So, what's your profession, jabailo? Computer programmer, you say? Ah, yes, at the very cutting edge of climate research.

While many non-scientists are advocating policy change in response to predicted climate change, this does not make the climate prediction, per se unscientific. Al Gore is not a scientist. He's an effective public speaker who collected a lot of disparate evidence and put it together in a form that can be easily understood by laymen. In doing so, he has not created an argument, he has amplified an argument.

You, however, disparage the very science upon which his presentation is based. You should not attack Al Gore, Jabailo, you should attack the science. Then you'll really win one.

I am a new member and is not fully aware of your activities.I am sure to add value in the system as soon as I will be familiar with the same.
Thanks,
A N Mukherjee