<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for McCain to skip another crucial climate vote]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:18:52 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>One wonders...</strong></p><p>...what'll happen if, elected as president, he has to deal with a Congress comprised mostly of Democrats?</p><p>
If he got this bill then, would he sign it, or veto it?</p><p>
...well, guess the only way to make sure is elect enough ecos to Congress to get a veto-proof majority.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>One wonders...</strong></p><p>...what'll happen if, elected as president, he has to deal with a Congress comprised mostly of Democrats?</p><p>
If he got this bill then, would he sign it, or veto it?</p><p>
...well, guess the only way to make sure is elect enough ecos to Congress to get a veto-proof majority.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by KenG</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:29:37 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Missing Votes</strong></p><p>Why do we let our legislators take time off work to run for office? I just checked the Senate voting records. Yes, McCain is number one in missed votes, Obama is number 3 and Clinton is number 5. Of the others in the top 5, Tim Johnson has a good excuse - he had a brain hemmorhage. Biden came in at number 4 but I've thought he was retired in place for years. maybe it's the huge distance he has to travel to get home.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Missing Votes</strong></p><p>Why do we let our legislators take time off work to run for office? I just checked the Senate voting records. Yes, McCain is number one in missed votes, Obama is number 3 and Clinton is number 5. Of the others in the top 5, Tim Johnson has a good excuse - he had a brain hemmorhage. Biden came in at number 4 but I've thought he was retired in place for years. maybe it's the huge distance he has to travel to get home.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by David Jenkins</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:37:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Partisan Jab Unwarranted</strong></p><p>Republicans for Environmental Protection (REP) is a soild green group that does not give their fellow Republicans a "pass." You fail to mention that REP routinely gives zeros on its scorecard to Republicans who earn it. Senator Bond received a zero and Senator Inhofe got a -4 (which is lower than his LCV score).</p><p>
There are plenty of green Republicans out here that beleive good stewardship is a consevative value that too many have lost sight of.</p><p>
By showing his partisan colors, Mr. Robert's does the environmental movement a disservice.Where is his coverage of Senator Clinton's remarks today in favor of thinning old growth forests, or Senator Obama's praise of coal?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Partisan Jab Unwarranted</strong></p><p>Republicans for Environmental Protection (REP) is a soild green group that does not give their fellow Republicans a "pass." You fail to mention that REP routinely gives zeros on its scorecard to Republicans who earn it. Senator Bond received a zero and Senator Inhofe got a -4 (which is lower than his LCV score).</p><p>
There are plenty of green Republicans out here that beleive good stewardship is a consevative value that too many have lost sight of.</p><p>
By showing his partisan colors, Mr. Robert's does the environmental movement a disservice.Where is his coverage of Senator Clinton's remarks today in favor of thinning old growth forests, or Senator Obama's praise of coal?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by davedenali</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:49:36 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cowardly-lion/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>to &quot;Partisan Jab Unwarranted&quot; re McCain<p>Rubbish. Senator McCain has a career LCV score of 26 percent. &nbsp;That is CAREER score. &nbsp;Dozens and dozens of votes. &nbsp;Consistently over his career. &nbsp;Look up Senator McCain's votes on LCV-scored issues over the years (<a href="http://www.lcv.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.lcv.org) and tell me he has a good environmental record -- without cracking up. &nbsp;Yes he's right some of the time. &nbsp;He's wrong more than not, and he's not fit to be President. </a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>to &quot;Partisan Jab Unwarranted&quot; re McCain<p>Rubbish. Senator McCain has a career LCV score of 26 percent. &nbsp;That is CAREER score. &nbsp;Dozens and dozens of votes. &nbsp;Consistently over his career. &nbsp;Look up Senator McCain's votes on LCV-scored issues over the years (<a href="http://www.lcv.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.lcv.org) and tell me he has a good environmental record -- without cracking up. &nbsp;Yes he's right some of the time. &nbsp;He's wrong more than not, and he's not fit to be President. </a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>