<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for The cost of the status quo]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Jon Rynn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cost-of-the-status-quo/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:59:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cost-of-the-status-quo/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Part of the N.Y. Times dance...</strong></p><p>..around the idea of peak oil: The author of this piece, the Times' oil correspondent, Jad Mouawad, has previously written that peak oil ideas are "in decline", or some such; but now he actually used the word "peaked" to describe many of the world's big oil reservoirs. &nbsp;He still won't admit that supply is an inherent problem; but the article goes through many of the big reservoirs, and even raises the possibility that the Saudis can't produce more. &nbsp;He still gives us such nuggets as this, from an oil industry exec: "The world is not running out of oil, but rather it's running out of oil production capacity." &nbsp;Huh?</p><p>
The discourse, even in the left media, on rising gasoline prices is really very primitive at this stage (as is the discussion on the campaign trail); we can't be in chronic decline, it must be the oil companies' fault! (an easy way to deal with the oil companies: nationalize them, just like most countries have done).</p><p>
But Mouawad points to one of the big problems we face as oil production declines: "To make up the shortfall, the world is increasingly turning to fuels made from unconventional sources, like biofuels or heavy oil.". &nbsp;Yikes!</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Part of the N.Y. Times dance...</strong></p><p>..around the idea of peak oil: The author of this piece, the Times' oil correspondent, Jad Mouawad, has previously written that peak oil ideas are "in decline", or some such; but now he actually used the word "peaked" to describe many of the world's big oil reservoirs. &nbsp;He still won't admit that supply is an inherent problem; but the article goes through many of the big reservoirs, and even raises the possibility that the Saudis can't produce more. &nbsp;He still gives us such nuggets as this, from an oil industry exec: "The world is not running out of oil, but rather it's running out of oil production capacity." &nbsp;Huh?</p><p>
The discourse, even in the left media, on rising gasoline prices is really very primitive at this stage (as is the discussion on the campaign trail); we can't be in chronic decline, it must be the oil companies' fault! (an easy way to deal with the oil companies: nationalize them, just like most countries have done).</p><p>
But Mouawad points to one of the big problems we face as oil production declines: "To make up the shortfall, the world is increasingly turning to fuels made from unconventional sources, like biofuels or heavy oil.". &nbsp;Yikes!</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by JMG</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cost-of-the-status-quo/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:56:05 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cost-of-the-status-quo/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Or coal</strong></p><p>(sound of humanity shooting itself)

<p>Save your community:  Cut greenhouse gas emissions 5% per year.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Or coal</strong></p><p>(sound of humanity shooting itself)

<p>Save your community:  Cut greenhouse gas emissions 5% per year.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Anna Haynes</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-cost-of-the-status-quo/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:06:27 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-cost-of-the-status-quo/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>As Gore said in  his recent TED talk...<p>"Junkies find veins in their toes when the ones in their arms and their legs collapse. Developing tar sands and coal shale is the equivalent."<p>
<a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/243" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/243<br>
(via earth2tech.com)</br></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>As Gore said in  his recent TED talk...<p>"Junkies find veins in their toes when the ones in their arms and their legs collapse. Developing tar sands and coal shale is the equivalent."<p>
<a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/243" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/243<br>
(via earth2tech.com)</br></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>