<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for It&#8217;s more complicated than you might think]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by BobKC</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-co2-temperature-correlation/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:42:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-co2-temperature-correlation/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Retry...<p>Hmmm... &nbsp;I don't think my post made it the first time. Try #2.<p>
The argument "CO2 was acting as a "feedback" over the time period in the figure above" has always seemed very weak to me. &nbsp;It appears like someone was struggling for a way to get CO2 into the forcing side of the equation and this is what they came up with. &nbsp;The graph makes much more sense to me if the CO2 changes are mainly a response to the temperature changes.<p>
<a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0407/0407005.pdf" rel="nofollow">These guys &nbsp;shoot some holes in the Milankovitch insolation theory and present another hypothesis that seems just as plausible as what you describe above.<p>
I don't think this issue is settled yet.</p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Retry...<p>Hmmm... &nbsp;I don't think my post made it the first time. Try #2.<p>
The argument "CO2 was acting as a "feedback" over the time period in the figure above" has always seemed very weak to me. &nbsp;It appears like someone was struggling for a way to get CO2 into the forcing side of the equation and this is what they came up with. &nbsp;The graph makes much more sense to me if the CO2 changes are mainly a response to the temperature changes.<p>
<a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0407/0407005.pdf" rel="nofollow">These guys &nbsp;shoot some holes in the Milankovitch insolation theory and present another hypothesis that seems just as plausible as what you describe above.<p>
I don't think this issue is settled yet.</p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Andrew Dessler</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-co2-temperature-correlation/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-co2-temperature-correlation/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I think we agree</strong></p><p>When I say that CO2 is acting as a feedback, I am indeed saying that it's a response to the warming ... but it's a response that causes further warming.</p><p>
As far as the cosmic ray theory goes, I don't have a good sense of how plausible that idea is. &nbsp;Overall, I agree that there are still some unresolved issues.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I think we agree</strong></p><p>When I say that CO2 is acting as a feedback, I am indeed saying that it's a response to the warming ... but it's a response that causes further warming.</p><p>
As far as the cosmic ray theory goes, I don't have a good sense of how plausible that idea is. &nbsp;Overall, I agree that there are still some unresolved issues.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by John L</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-co2-temperature-correlation/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:23:20 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-co2-temperature-correlation/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well<p>It sure its complicated, and not always easy to understand. This post about it was great though, and easy to read as well. Thanks. 

<p>John, Web Programmer currently working on the <a href="http://www.howtogeterections.com" rel="nofollow">How To Get Firm Strong Erection project.
</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well<p>It sure its complicated, and not always easy to understand. This post about it was great though, and easy to read as well. Thanks. 

<p>John, Web Programmer currently working on the <a href="http://www.howtogeterections.com" rel="nofollow">How To Get Firm Strong Erection project.
</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>