Please indicate your scientific credentials that would compel one to believe your assessment of  the merit of that article rather than the views of the author.

If you want scientific credentials I refer you to the fine and highly qualified people who have authored the IPCC chapters on atmospheric CO2.  I apologize for not producing a link but I am out of town, busy, and without my bookmarks.

I ask no one to take my word for anything, but I do think a little common sense of your own should dispatch 95% of the contrarian talking points out there, this one included.  The rest you must either think hard about or rely on the vast majority opinion of relevant experts.

"The problem with people who have no vices is that they tend to have some pretty annoying virtues." -- [paraphrased] Elizabeth Taylor

The alarm bells start going with parts like this:

"Modern greenhouse hypothesis is based on the work of G.S. Callendar and C.D. Keeling, following S. Arrhenius, as latterly popularized by the IPCC. Review of available literature raise the question if these authors have systematically discarded a large number of valid technical papers and older atmospheric CO2 determinations because they did not fit their hypothesis? Obviously they use only a few carefully selected values from the older literature, invariably choosing results that are consistent with the hypothesis of an induced rise of CO2 in air caused by the burning of fossil fuel."

That's not the writing of scientific article but the kind of writing you find in conspiracy novels. Suggestive questions and huge leaps in conclusions followed by the conclusion that the entire scientific community has been wrong, devious or fraudulent. Extraordinary claims ask for extraordinary evidence.

If there is one thing scientists like it is finding mistakes in each other's papers... I've been there. If scientists had really published such bad, bad research it would by now have been thrown out.

I see. You do not wish to answer a valid question asked by a new reader? Links would make no difference anyway. I asked about YOUR credentials that will make me want to believe your posts, not the credentials of others who do not offer their wisdom here.