<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Why don&#8217;t the big political blogs cover environmental issues?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by jdhlax</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 13:29:36 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Priorities</strong></p><p>"Is it just that the particular individuals involved have no interest or background on eco-stuff?"</p><p>
Yes. &nbsp;As you commented awhile ago, most people, including leftists, don't give any priority to environmental concerns. &nbsp;By the time things get so bad that those people have to give the environment the priority it deserves, it almost certainly will be too late.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Priorities</strong></p><p>"Is it just that the particular individuals involved have no interest or background on eco-stuff?"</p><p>
Yes. &nbsp;As you commented awhile ago, most people, including leftists, don't give any priority to environmental concerns. &nbsp;By the time things get so bad that those people have to give the environment the priority it deserves, it almost certainly will be too late.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by edavidt</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 14:15:37 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What isn't an &quot;environmental issue?&quot;</strong></p><p>While it could be argued that the mainstream commentaries do not concern themselves with environmental or energy concerns, I believe that almost everything we read about today is intimately conected to and centered on both of these issues. &nbsp;I suppose the biology and ecosystem paradigms that I use as models for understanding provide me with very broad definitions of both of these terms. So, I suppose I would disagree. &nbsp;However, we haven't really called these issues environmental issues. We have other names for them.</p><p>
I would say that the problem isn't that the environment doesn't have enough commentary, it is that those commenting don't realize that they are indeed commenting on the environment. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What isn't an &quot;environmental issue?&quot;</strong></p><p>While it could be argued that the mainstream commentaries do not concern themselves with environmental or energy concerns, I believe that almost everything we read about today is intimately conected to and centered on both of these issues. &nbsp;I suppose the biology and ecosystem paradigms that I use as models for understanding provide me with very broad definitions of both of these terms. So, I suppose I would disagree. &nbsp;However, we haven't really called these issues environmental issues. We have other names for them.</p><p>
I would say that the problem isn't that the environment doesn't have enough commentary, it is that those commenting don't realize that they are indeed commenting on the environment. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by alevin</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 22:51:27 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Adina Levin<p>DailyKos, MyDD on the left, and RedState on the right, have a "diary" feature that lets community participants write entries. One way to get billing on those sites is write good diaries that get posted to the front page.<p>
For example, there was a great diary on Kos by a person who spent his career in the coal industry and wrote about the environmental ups and downs:<br>
<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/4/23/214849/506" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/4/23/214849/506</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Adina Levin<p>DailyKos, MyDD on the left, and RedState on the right, have a "diary" feature that lets community participants write entries. One way to get billing on those sites is write good diaries that get posted to the front page.<p>
For example, there was a great diary on Kos by a person who spent his career in the coal industry and wrote about the environmental ups and downs:<br>
<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/4/23/214849/506" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/4/23/214849/506</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by enrique</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 04:38:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Enviro blogs<p>I started an environmental blog about five weeks ago, but hardly out of political expediency. <br>
Part of the incentive was money, at least on my part, and to see if an environmnetal blog could <br>
gain a wider audience. &nbsp;Blogging from the West Coast does have a downside in that so much of environmental reporting revolves &nbsp;around Beltway politics. <p>
<a href="http://commonground.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://commonground.typepad.com</a></p></br></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Enviro blogs<p>I started an environmental blog about five weeks ago, but hardly out of political expediency. <br>
Part of the incentive was money, at least on my part, and to see if an environmnetal blog could <br>
gain a wider audience. &nbsp;Blogging from the West Coast does have a downside in that so much of environmental reporting revolves &nbsp;around Beltway politics. <p>
<a href="http://commonground.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://commonground.typepad.com</a></p></br></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Dyre42</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 05:57:28 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>re: The big blogs</strong></p><p>I think part of that problem is that the enviroment is taking a back seat to the war and nuclear proliferation. Liberal blogs make occasional note of the Bush administration's enviromental policies but usually only one complaint/fault in a long list.<br>
We are living in "interesting times".<br>
(If you recall the old Chinese curse.)</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>re: The big blogs</strong></p><p>I think part of that problem is that the enviroment is taking a back seat to the war and nuclear proliferation. Liberal blogs make occasional note of the Bush administration's enviromental policies but usually only one complaint/fault in a long list.<br>
We are living in "interesting times".<br>
(If you recall the old Chinese curse.)</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 08:45:35 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-big-blogs/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The key to environmental blogging.<p><a href="http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog<p>
The key to green blogging is the same as the key to arguing political positions that reflect environmental concerns.<p>
They need to be connected &nbsp;into central issues in energy policy, economic policy, and foreign policy.<p>
Oil.... oil wars, economic decline, trade deficits, national bankruptcy, personal bankruptcy from high energy costs...<p>
Nuclear.... waste, rising fuel costs,cancer from mining, astronomical waste disposal and decommissioning costs, uninsurable risk proven by the Chernobyl disaster, leaking nuclear waste dumps, imposibility of siting because of NIMBY...<p>
Coal..... mercury pollution concentrated through the food chain, greenhouse gas climate disaster, lung cancer, mining accidents,<br>
rising costs, destruction of wilderness.<p>
Wind, solar, plugin hybrids,and biofuel.....stable low cost energy, revived economy, good jobs building this equipment, great export markets, no need for oil wars, revived uS manufacturing and tax base paying down the national debt. &nbsp;<p>
A concerted effort with all US allies to end reliance on fossil and nuclear power and the wars, toxic destruction, and risks from terror and economic devestation that come with it.<br>
</br></p></p></br></p></p></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The key to environmental blogging.<p><a href="http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog<p>
The key to green blogging is the same as the key to arguing political positions that reflect environmental concerns.<p>
They need to be connected &nbsp;into central issues in energy policy, economic policy, and foreign policy.<p>
Oil.... oil wars, economic decline, trade deficits, national bankruptcy, personal bankruptcy from high energy costs...<p>
Nuclear.... waste, rising fuel costs,cancer from mining, astronomical waste disposal and decommissioning costs, uninsurable risk proven by the Chernobyl disaster, leaking nuclear waste dumps, imposibility of siting because of NIMBY...<p>
Coal..... mercury pollution concentrated through the food chain, greenhouse gas climate disaster, lung cancer, mining accidents,<br>
rising costs, destruction of wilderness.<p>
Wind, solar, plugin hybrids,and biofuel.....stable low cost energy, revived economy, good jobs building this equipment, great export markets, no need for oil wars, revived uS manufacturing and tax base paying down the national debt. &nbsp;<p>
A concerted effort with all US allies to end reliance on fossil and nuclear power and the wars, toxic destruction, and risks from terror and economic devestation that come with it.<br>
</br></p></p></br></p></p></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>