<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Big biz gets in line]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by spaceshaper</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-3c-initiative/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:07:16 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-3c-initiative/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Before we get too excited..</strong></p><p>Duke Energy, one of the corporations listed in the 3C group, currently has a proposal before the N.C. Utilities Commission to build two new coal plants.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Before we get too excited..</strong></p><p>Duke Energy, one of the corporations listed in the 3C group, currently has a proposal before the N.C. Utilities Commission to build two new coal plants.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by GliderGuider</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/the-3c-initiative/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:25:15 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/the-3c-initiative/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Thanks for the heads up on Duke</strong></p><p>When I first saw this I was enthusiastic about it being early evidence of a corporate tipping point. &nbsp;While some of the signatories may be legitimate, it's all too easy for organizations like this to act as camouflage for those who find it easy to sign statements of principle they have little intention of honouring...</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Thanks for the heads up on Duke</strong></p><p>When I first saw this I was enthusiastic about it being early evidence of a corporate tipping point. &nbsp;While some of the signatories may be legitimate, it's all too easy for organizations like this to act as camouflage for those who find it easy to sign statements of principle they have little intention of honouring...</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>