<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for The last to react]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Sam Wells</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:07:31 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Umm, dooode!</strong></p><p>"SECTIONA1.AA(a) The state climatologist shall establish a global warming task force composed of business leaders, academic scholars, scientists, economists, and environmentalists to develop<br>
a balanced and authoritative assessment of the global warming challenges and opportunities facing Texas."</p><p>
The state fooking who? &nbsp;You got a dang state freaking climatologist? &nbsp;Must be an Aggie, never heard of the son of a buck. &nbsp;You're not talking about that crack-pot who was throwing silver iodide out of airplanes trying to get the rain clouds to form, are you? &nbsp;That old boy was whacked, although a good climatologist.</p><p>
And congratulations but honestly, no bills have been passed and sent to the Governor so you never know what could happen between now and June. &nbsp;About 90 percent of these bills just fall off the vine due to neglect. &nbsp;Dat de trut', mon. &nbsp;</p><p>
But I hope you're having fun. &nbsp;/sammie

<p>Onward through the fog</p></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Umm, dooode!</strong></p><p>"SECTIONA1.AA(a) The state climatologist shall establish a global warming task force composed of business leaders, academic scholars, scientists, economists, and environmentalists to develop<br>
a balanced and authoritative assessment of the global warming challenges and opportunities facing Texas."</p><p>
The state fooking who? &nbsp;You got a dang state freaking climatologist? &nbsp;Must be an Aggie, never heard of the son of a buck. &nbsp;You're not talking about that crack-pot who was throwing silver iodide out of airplanes trying to get the rain clouds to form, are you? &nbsp;That old boy was whacked, although a good climatologist.</p><p>
And congratulations but honestly, no bills have been passed and sent to the Governor so you never know what could happen between now and June. &nbsp;About 90 percent of these bills just fall off the vine due to neglect. &nbsp;Dat de trut', mon. &nbsp;</p><p>
But I hope you're having fun. &nbsp;/sammie

<p>Onward through the fog</p></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Andrew Dessler</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:29:54 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>State climatologist</strong></p><p>All states have state climatologists. &nbsp;The Texas State Climatologist is one of my colleagues from my department, so I can assure you he's a credible scientist.</p><p>
You make a good point, though. &nbsp;Not all state climatologists are credible --- there are more than a few wackos in that group.</p><p>
We'll see how this bill goes. &nbsp;It certainly might die on the vine, but I think it has a good chance to pass.</p><p>
Thanks!<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>State climatologist</strong></p><p>All states have state climatologists. &nbsp;The Texas State Climatologist is one of my colleagues from my department, so I can assure you he's a credible scientist.</p><p>
You make a good point, though. &nbsp;Not all state climatologists are credible --- there are more than a few wackos in that group.</p><p>
We'll see how this bill goes. &nbsp;It certainly might die on the vine, but I think it has a good chance to pass.</p><p>
Thanks!<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by JMG</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:07:40 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Oregon doesn't</strong></p><p>Oregon most explicitly does NOT have a state climatologist, a matter that caused quite a little dustup when the Gov told the guy who liked to bill himself that way to knock it off.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Oregon doesn't</strong></p><p>Oregon most explicitly does NOT have a state climatologist, a matter that caused quite a little dustup when the Gov told the guy who liked to bill himself that way to knock it off.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Andrew Dessler</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A few outliers<p>There are a few states (Oregon, Virginia) where the climatologist was a particularly good at rejecting science. &nbsp;In those cases, the Gov. has resorted to other tactics to get rid of them, such as disavowing the office in its entirety. &nbsp;I'm certain that if the climatologists in those states had a more accurate understanding of the science, the entire episode would never have occurred.<p>
For those not familiar with the climatologist kerfuffle, see <a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-says-pat-michaels-is-virginia.html" rel="nofollow">here or <a href="http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070222/NEWS01/70222005/1002" rel="nofollow">here.<br>
</br></a></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A few outliers<p>There are a few states (Oregon, Virginia) where the climatologist was a particularly good at rejecting science. &nbsp;In those cases, the Gov. has resorted to other tactics to get rid of them, such as disavowing the office in its entirety. &nbsp;I'm certain that if the climatologists in those states had a more accurate understanding of the science, the entire episode would never have occurred.<p>
For those not familiar with the climatologist kerfuffle, see <a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-says-pat-michaels-is-virginia.html" rel="nofollow">here or <a href="http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070222/NEWS01/70222005/1002" rel="nofollow">here.<br>
</br></a></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by EliRabett</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:52:47 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/texas-climates-anti-canary/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I rather like the name<p>I rather like calling the governors' manuver...<a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html" rel="nofollow"> the Kaine shuffle</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I rather like the name<p>I rather like calling the governors' manuver...<a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html" rel="nofollow"> the Kaine shuffle</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>