<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for We knew we liked that guy]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tester-kills-liquid-coal-amendment/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:29:33 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tester-kills-liquid-coal-amendment/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;big-ups&quot;?</strong></p><p>It may be remembered that after the election, I did indeed opine that Tester seemed the most promising of the new Democratic Senators. &nbsp;And here we are! &nbsp;Jim Webb has been getting by far the most TV face time, and generally he has comported himself well. &nbsp;But Jon Tester definitely deserves more attention. &nbsp;And I am glad, DR, that you have held him up for praise.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;big-ups&quot;?</strong></p><p>It may be remembered that after the election, I did indeed opine that Tester seemed the most promising of the new Democratic Senators. &nbsp;And here we are! &nbsp;Jim Webb has been getting by far the most TV face time, and generally he has comported himself well. &nbsp;But Jon Tester definitely deserves more attention. &nbsp;And I am glad, DR, that you have held him up for praise.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/tester-kills-liquid-coal-amendment/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:27:20 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/tester-kills-liquid-coal-amendment/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Uber<p>Rock on.<br>
Coal to Liquid is damned scary.<p>
Although not nearly as scary as Palm Oil Biodiesel<br>
<a href="http://www.greyfalcon.net/biofuels2" rel="nofollow">http://www.greyfalcon.net/biofuels2</a></br></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Uber<p>Rock on.<br>
Coal to Liquid is damned scary.<p>
Although not nearly as scary as Palm Oil Biodiesel<br>
<a href="http://www.greyfalcon.net/biofuels2" rel="nofollow">http://www.greyfalcon.net/biofuels2</a></br></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>