<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Competing offer for U.S. Sugar complicates Everglades restoration plan]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by hipifreq</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/sugar1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:31:27 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/sugar1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Get to the heart of the problem</strong></p><p>What needs to be addressed with the sugar industry in Florida is the massive government subsidy that receive. Without money from my pocket growing sugar in Florida would not be a profitable business as sugar from other countries is much cheaper to produce, and not necessarily because labor is cheaper, but because it's just easier to grow.</p><p>
IMHO, we should remove the subsidy and allow these farms to leave. Then the state/feds can pickup the land on the cheap.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Get to the heart of the problem</strong></p><p>What needs to be addressed with the sugar industry in Florida is the massive government subsidy that receive. Without money from my pocket growing sugar in Florida would not be a profitable business as sugar from other countries is much cheaper to produce, and not necessarily because labor is cheaper, but because it's just easier to grow.</p><p>
IMHO, we should remove the subsidy and allow these farms to leave. Then the state/feds can pickup the land on the cheap.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/sugar1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:10:59 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/sugar1/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Once again farming and biodiversity</strong></p><p>clash. Which one will win?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Once again farming and biodiversity</strong></p><p>clash. Which one will win?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Wolverine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/sugar1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:39:02 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/sugar1/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Just Take The Land</strong></p><p>The government can always condemn the land and take it by eminent domain. &nbsp;So long as the government can show a public purpose, which restoration of the Everglades clearly is, this type of action cannot be stopped. &nbsp;The only issue in court would be the amount of money the government would have to pay.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Just Take The Land</strong></p><p>The government can always condemn the land and take it by eminent domain. &nbsp;So long as the government can show a public purpose, which restoration of the Everglades clearly is, this type of action cannot be stopped. &nbsp;The only issue in court would be the amount of money the government would have to pay.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>