<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Will the Senate ever get to constructive (or destructive) debate on climate bill?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Bud Dingler</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/stalled/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:57:51 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/stalled/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>congress</strong></p><p>cant solve SS, health care or other REAL issues affecting all Americans, but yet they are going take up an issue thats still a theory. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>congress</strong></p><p>cant solve SS, health care or other REAL issues affecting all Americans, but yet they are going take up an issue thats still a theory. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/stalled/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:59:14 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/stalled/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sure we'll get to it...</strong></p><p>...just as soon as we get the presidency and/or a veto-proof majority in Congress.</p><p>
Next year at the earliest.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sure we'll get to it...</strong></p><p>...just as soon as we get the presidency and/or a veto-proof majority in Congress.</p><p>
Next year at the earliest.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/stalled/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:10:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/stalled/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Might be best</strong></p><p>It is probably best politically to let the GOP kill this bill, then blame them during the election battle.</p><p>
If it passed, in it's present form, it might delay any real climate legislation. &nbsp;For Lieberman there has to be some angle involved, this rat doesn't do anything on principle.</p><p>
My guess is that the continued reliance on imported oil fostered by the bill, would be a hidden excuse to keep oil wars going. &nbsp;The neoconman dream of invading Iran is Lieberman's &nbsp;main issue. &nbsp;The sole motivation in (political) life for this traitor.</p><p>
Is there a way to boot Lieberman out of the party once we have a clear senate majority? &nbsp;His campaigning for McBush is a perfect reason. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Might be best</strong></p><p>It is probably best politically to let the GOP kill this bill, then blame them during the election battle.</p><p>
If it passed, in it's present form, it might delay any real climate legislation. &nbsp;For Lieberman there has to be some angle involved, this rat doesn't do anything on principle.</p><p>
My guess is that the continued reliance on imported oil fostered by the bill, would be a hidden excuse to keep oil wars going. &nbsp;The neoconman dream of invading Iran is Lieberman's &nbsp;main issue. &nbsp;The sole motivation in (political) life for this traitor.</p><p>
Is there a way to boot Lieberman out of the party once we have a clear senate majority? &nbsp;His campaigning for McBush is a perfect reason. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>