<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for South Carolina primary]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by ids</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>no big thing</strong></p><p>South Carolina is almost certainly going Republican in the general election. &nbsp;The Obama pull here is mostly irrelevant other than handicapping a horse race.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>no big thing</strong></p><p>South Carolina is almost certainly going Republican in the general election. &nbsp;The Obama pull here is mostly irrelevant other than handicapping a horse race.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Bikechess</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:17:30 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You must admit he inspires people,</strong></p><p>Not sure why its irrelevant that Obama won a red state. &nbsp;Obama could actually unite the country and win in a landslide. &nbsp;This would provide the mandate that environmentalists dream about...</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You must admit he inspires people,</strong></p><p>Not sure why its irrelevant that Obama won a red state. &nbsp;Obama could actually unite the country and win in a landslide. &nbsp;This would provide the mandate that environmentalists dream about...</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by wesrolley</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:27:36 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The Clinton Spin</strong></p><p>Mr. President himself has already give the spin. &nbsp;Remember, Jesse Jackson won S. Carolina twice. &nbsp;There you have it. &nbsp;According to Clinton, Obama is just another Jesse Jackson. </p><p>
Mr. Clinton will shape this race to that it becomes even more racial and that is one thing that this country can not afford right now.</p><p>
I would think that he has already calculated the effect of this on the Hispanic vote and sees more of the Hispanics coming over to Hillary. &nbsp;Pure calculated divide and conquer politics. </p><p>
Makes me glad that I am not a politician. 

<p>Wes Rolley

CoChair - EcoAction Committee
Green Party US</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The Clinton Spin</strong></p><p>Mr. President himself has already give the spin. &nbsp;Remember, Jesse Jackson won S. Carolina twice. &nbsp;There you have it. &nbsp;According to Clinton, Obama is just another Jesse Jackson. </p><p>
Mr. Clinton will shape this race to that it becomes even more racial and that is one thing that this country can not afford right now.</p><p>
I would think that he has already calculated the effect of this on the Hispanic vote and sees more of the Hispanics coming over to Hillary. &nbsp;Pure calculated divide and conquer politics. </p><p>
Makes me glad that I am not a politician. 

<p>Wes Rolley

CoChair - EcoAction Committee
Green Party US</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by spaceshaper</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:28:52 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>When did that happen?</strong></p><p>Caroline Kennedy is now Robert F.'s son?

<p>The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>When did that happen?</strong></p><p>Caroline Kennedy is now Robert F.'s son?

<p>The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:45:54 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>JFK, MLK style</strong></p><p>Hillary just doesn't have it. &nbsp;Barack had them chanting at his victory rally.</p><p>
Caroline endorsing Barack is perfect, and perfect timing. &nbsp;This is a real primary and a real party. &nbsp;No more rubber stamp. &nbsp;No more smoke filled room decision. &nbsp;Populism lives.</p><p>
Will someone tell Brack about plugin hybrids now? &nbsp;Hillary heard about them a few weeks back.</p><p>
Hillary wants to divert oil and coal subsidies to renewables and conservation.</p><p>
Barack is for cap and trade, nuclear power, "clean" coal, and fuel farming. &nbsp;Hillary is skeptical of these lobbyist backed ideas.</p><p>
The populist is turning out to be the corporatist front man. &nbsp;Barack is following in Bill Clinton's mode. &nbsp;Bill is a rock star too. &nbsp;just like jFK, MLK, and Barack.</p><p>
Bill got almost nothing done on the environment. &nbsp;Is GHG climate change a rock star, populist issue? &nbsp;No. &nbsp;It would be were it connected to jobs.</p><p>
Can Hillary do that and become a baby boomer populist? &nbsp;If she makes health care a populist issue as well. &nbsp;Revive the job and manufacturing base by fighting GHG and soaring energy prices, then use the surplus to pay for healthcare.</p><p>
To long for a bumpersticker, hard to chant. &nbsp;Maybe she will be the first. &nbsp;FDRs fireside chats were more than bumpersticker slogans. &nbsp;Maybe we need an essay.</p><p>
Baby boomers will vote for McCain, and he has the same energy policy as Barack. &nbsp;Has the nuclear, coal, and fuel farming agribizz lobby won this election already? &nbsp;Both McCain and Barack are touting their solutions.</p><p>
Hillary could distinguish her position right about now. &nbsp;And make the general election at least a horse race for the lobbyists. &nbsp;</p><p>
I wish Barack's populist change wave included renewable enegy policy, but it doesn't. &nbsp;With a Barack/McCain race we have a choice between two slightly different corporate lobbyist energy plans.</p><p>
Come on Hillary. &nbsp;Get Bill out there talking about how to reduce gas prices and save the planet, instead of talking about Barack.</p><p>
Barack just beat the Clinton strategy, set a bear trap, and Bill stepped right in it. &nbsp;Maybe he can do that to McCain, maybe not. &nbsp;Remember the swiftboaters, waiting over the horizon. &nbsp;Rove's navy, ready to sink our candidate. &nbsp;Can Barack beat them? &nbsp;</p><p>
Women behind Hillary could, they have the numbers to swamp the polls and over run any amount of GOP vote fixing.</p><p>
The youth change wave, rock star vote will have a harder time. &nbsp;Only a small percentage of younger voters actually vote. &nbsp;But they love to party! &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>JFK, MLK style</strong></p><p>Hillary just doesn't have it. &nbsp;Barack had them chanting at his victory rally.</p><p>
Caroline endorsing Barack is perfect, and perfect timing. &nbsp;This is a real primary and a real party. &nbsp;No more rubber stamp. &nbsp;No more smoke filled room decision. &nbsp;Populism lives.</p><p>
Will someone tell Brack about plugin hybrids now? &nbsp;Hillary heard about them a few weeks back.</p><p>
Hillary wants to divert oil and coal subsidies to renewables and conservation.</p><p>
Barack is for cap and trade, nuclear power, "clean" coal, and fuel farming. &nbsp;Hillary is skeptical of these lobbyist backed ideas.</p><p>
The populist is turning out to be the corporatist front man. &nbsp;Barack is following in Bill Clinton's mode. &nbsp;Bill is a rock star too. &nbsp;just like jFK, MLK, and Barack.</p><p>
Bill got almost nothing done on the environment. &nbsp;Is GHG climate change a rock star, populist issue? &nbsp;No. &nbsp;It would be were it connected to jobs.</p><p>
Can Hillary do that and become a baby boomer populist? &nbsp;If she makes health care a populist issue as well. &nbsp;Revive the job and manufacturing base by fighting GHG and soaring energy prices, then use the surplus to pay for healthcare.</p><p>
To long for a bumpersticker, hard to chant. &nbsp;Maybe she will be the first. &nbsp;FDRs fireside chats were more than bumpersticker slogans. &nbsp;Maybe we need an essay.</p><p>
Baby boomers will vote for McCain, and he has the same energy policy as Barack. &nbsp;Has the nuclear, coal, and fuel farming agribizz lobby won this election already? &nbsp;Both McCain and Barack are touting their solutions.</p><p>
Hillary could distinguish her position right about now. &nbsp;And make the general election at least a horse race for the lobbyists. &nbsp;</p><p>
I wish Barack's populist change wave included renewable enegy policy, but it doesn't. &nbsp;With a Barack/McCain race we have a choice between two slightly different corporate lobbyist energy plans.</p><p>
Come on Hillary. &nbsp;Get Bill out there talking about how to reduce gas prices and save the planet, instead of talking about Barack.</p><p>
Barack just beat the Clinton strategy, set a bear trap, and Bill stepped right in it. &nbsp;Maybe he can do that to McCain, maybe not. &nbsp;Remember the swiftboaters, waiting over the horizon. &nbsp;Rove's navy, ready to sink our candidate. &nbsp;Can Barack beat them? &nbsp;</p><p>
Women behind Hillary could, they have the numbers to swamp the polls and over run any amount of GOP vote fixing.</p><p>
The youth change wave, rock star vote will have a harder time. &nbsp;Only a small percentage of younger voters actually vote. &nbsp;But they love to party! &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:58:08 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the NYTimes and Caroline</strong></p><p>I do not think there was anything surprising about the SC Democratic primary. &nbsp;We Edwards folks thought John was getting a bit of momentum, but whatever, he got pretty much what the polls said he would get.</p><p>
And, lest it get out of hand that he won in 2004, he was running against that adorable charm-bucket John Kerry in 2004; Hillary and Obama are competition of a totally superior sort.</p><p>
As for "a good old-fashioned butt-kicking," there is nothing "old-fashioned" about these primaries. &nbsp;This is a totally new game.</p><p>
As for the NYTimes endorsements: These were unusually weakly written, IMHO. &nbsp;The arguments for and against, regarding both the Democrats and the Republicans, were shallow and unconvincing. &nbsp;Their dismissal of John Edwards (and of Mitt Romney too, for that matter, though Romney is an utterly loathable person) made no sense, nor did the way they rejected Obama.</p><p>
As for Caroline's endorsement of Obama: Ummm. &nbsp;She is obviously a sentimental favorite. &nbsp;But she is so disappointingly uncommunicative! &nbsp;With no graces as a speaker, either, as she showed amply at the Democratic National Convention in 2004.</p><p>
I lightly agree with what she has to say about Obama and his candidacy. &nbsp;And I am not surprised that she feels as she (says she) feels. &nbsp;But she has not influenced my opinions at all.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the NYTimes and Caroline</strong></p><p>I do not think there was anything surprising about the SC Democratic primary. &nbsp;We Edwards folks thought John was getting a bit of momentum, but whatever, he got pretty much what the polls said he would get.</p><p>
And, lest it get out of hand that he won in 2004, he was running against that adorable charm-bucket John Kerry in 2004; Hillary and Obama are competition of a totally superior sort.</p><p>
As for "a good old-fashioned butt-kicking," there is nothing "old-fashioned" about these primaries. &nbsp;This is a totally new game.</p><p>
As for the NYTimes endorsements: These were unusually weakly written, IMHO. &nbsp;The arguments for and against, regarding both the Democrats and the Republicans, were shallow and unconvincing. &nbsp;Their dismissal of John Edwards (and of Mitt Romney too, for that matter, though Romney is an utterly loathable person) made no sense, nor did the way they rejected Obama.</p><p>
As for Caroline's endorsement of Obama: Ummm. &nbsp;She is obviously a sentimental favorite. &nbsp;But she is so disappointingly uncommunicative! &nbsp;With no graces as a speaker, either, as she showed amply at the Democratic National Convention in 2004.</p><p>
I lightly agree with what she has to say about Obama and his candidacy. &nbsp;And I am not surprised that she feels as she (says she) feels. &nbsp;But she has not influenced my opinions at all.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by GreenMom</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:29:23 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well</strong></p><p><br>
Amazing, it's not as if Hillary has never fronted a corporation.</p><p>
I'm hopeful that were Obama to become president, he would cease to be concerned with corporate interests specific to Illinois, i.e. corn and coal.</p><p>
Anyway the big story in South Carolina is the turnout -- didn't Democractic turnout in SC exceed Republican turnout? &nbsp;When did THAT ever happen in the last 40 years?</p><p>
Obama is becoming a JFK-like phenomenon. &nbsp;He's starting to show that he may be the Dem that can WIN in November. &nbsp;That's the important thing.</p><p>
I believe he's educable on renewable energy. &nbsp;Let's make sure we educate him.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well</strong></p><p><br>
Amazing, it's not as if Hillary has never fronted a corporation.</p><p>
I'm hopeful that were Obama to become president, he would cease to be concerned with corporate interests specific to Illinois, i.e. corn and coal.</p><p>
Anyway the big story in South Carolina is the turnout -- didn't Democractic turnout in SC exceed Republican turnout? &nbsp;When did THAT ever happen in the last 40 years?</p><p>
Obama is becoming a JFK-like phenomenon. &nbsp;He's starting to show that he may be the Dem that can WIN in November. &nbsp;That's the important thing.</p><p>
I believe he's educable on renewable energy. &nbsp;Let's make sure we educate him.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yep</strong></p><p>Education again. &nbsp;We have to keep making noise. &nbsp;</p><p>
Yah, yah, yah..we are mad as hell, and we won't take this clean coal and nuclear, fuel farming anymore! &nbsp;Great bunpersticker.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yep</strong></p><p>Education again. &nbsp;We have to keep making noise. &nbsp;</p><p>
Yah, yah, yah..we are mad as hell, and we won't take this clean coal and nuclear, fuel farming anymore! &nbsp;Great bunpersticker.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:50:19 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Huh</strong></p><p>Well I would have preferred Edwards to either of em.</p><p>
But frankly I don't know which way to vote between Hillary/Obama.</p><p>
I'm a bit more concerned with getting any Democrat into the White House.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Huh</strong></p><p>Well I would have preferred Edwards to either of em.</p><p>
But frankly I don't know which way to vote between Hillary/Obama.</p><p>
I'm a bit more concerned with getting any Democrat into the White House.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:45:55 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Great bun per sticker&quot;!</strong></p><p>Cute, Amazing!</p><p>
Just to be clear, Grey Falcon, I have nothing against Obama. &nbsp;He is a fantastic "symbol"-candidate, and on that level at least I would have no problem supporting him in November.</p><p>
But, while I cannot believe the NY Times editorialists' discounting him, still I would like to know more about his political and social values, and why his new, allegedly unifying style of politics will not amount to a capitulation on old but gravely important progressive issues.</p><p>
Poor John Edwards! &nbsp;The current political environment ought to have favored him greatly -- if it were not for the fact that he is competing against not one but two candidates whose candidacies are of terrific historic appeal.</p><p>
I hope he has not lingered long on the horrible thought that must have entered his poor little well-coiffed head: that very many of the people who voted for him in SC only voted for him because they would sooner die than vote for a black candidate.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Great bun per sticker&quot;!</strong></p><p>Cute, Amazing!</p><p>
Just to be clear, Grey Falcon, I have nothing against Obama. &nbsp;He is a fantastic "symbol"-candidate, and on that level at least I would have no problem supporting him in November.</p><p>
But, while I cannot believe the NY Times editorialists' discounting him, still I would like to know more about his political and social values, and why his new, allegedly unifying style of politics will not amount to a capitulation on old but gravely important progressive issues.</p><p>
Poor John Edwards! &nbsp;The current political environment ought to have favored him greatly -- if it were not for the fact that he is competing against not one but two candidates whose candidacies are of terrific historic appeal.</p><p>
I hope he has not lingered long on the horrible thought that must have entered his poor little well-coiffed head: that very many of the people who voted for him in SC only voted for him because they would sooner die than vote for a black candidate.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by ids</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:09:03 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bikechess,</strong></p><p>Obama won the Dem primary, that is not winning a red state. &nbsp;</p><p>
Wouldn't it be nice if he won in a landslide and provide the enviro mandate? &nbsp;Yes, but he is campaigning as much for digging bigger holes as not. &nbsp;That does not create a mandate in office for any significant change. &nbsp;You can hope, though, if you like. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bikechess,</strong></p><p>Obama won the Dem primary, that is not winning a red state. &nbsp;</p><p>
Wouldn't it be nice if he won in a landslide and provide the enviro mandate? &nbsp;Yes, but he is campaigning as much for digging bigger holes as not. &nbsp;That does not create a mandate in office for any significant change. &nbsp;You can hope, though, if you like. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by bookerly</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:14:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>SC Vote</strong></p><p><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;It seems that the Clinton's sense of entitlement really blinded them during the campaign. &nbsp;Of especial interest is that the places where Bill spoke, Hillary's share of the Black vote DEcreased. &nbsp;Someone needs to take that man to the woodshed and get him back on track.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;The Democratic vote was higher partially because of better weather.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;An impressive win by Obama!! &nbsp;(I would still be voting for Edwards, but may have missed the deadline to apply from overseas, oh well, by then it may not make any difference.)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;All of the Republicans are bad and all of the Democrats are mediocre. &nbsp;Say, didn't I see this movie before?? &nbsp;Is this another remake?? &nbsp;I hope not!!!</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;patrick in Beijing</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>SC Vote</strong></p><p><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;It seems that the Clinton's sense of entitlement really blinded them during the campaign. &nbsp;Of especial interest is that the places where Bill spoke, Hillary's share of the Black vote DEcreased. &nbsp;Someone needs to take that man to the woodshed and get him back on track.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;The Democratic vote was higher partially because of better weather.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;An impressive win by Obama!! &nbsp;(I would still be voting for Edwards, but may have missed the deadline to apply from overseas, oh well, by then it may not make any difference.)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;All of the Republicans are bad and all of the Democrats are mediocre. &nbsp;Say, didn't I see this movie before?? &nbsp;Is this another remake?? &nbsp;I hope not!!!</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;patrick in Beijing</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:49:38 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/south-carolina-primary/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>But stickers</strong></p><p>These would get more attention than bumperstickers Canis! &nbsp;Hehey, inspiration and mistyping go together.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>But stickers</strong></p><p>These would get more attention than bumperstickers Canis! &nbsp;Hehey, inspiration and mistyping go together.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>