<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Notes on the new Supreme Court nominee.]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/scotus-roberts/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:59:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/scotus-roberts/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wedge issues and Rovian &quot;strategery&quot;.<p><a href="http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/21/1058047.html" rel="nofollow">http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/21/1058047.html<p>
Oppose Roberts because a woman ought to get this appointment, not on a microscopic examination of his politics.<p>
Rove wants us to go ballistic on this one. &nbsp;Don't do it.</p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wedge issues and Rovian &quot;strategery&quot;.<p><a href="http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/21/1058047.html" rel="nofollow">http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/21/1058047.html<p>
Oppose Roberts because a woman ought to get this appointment, not on a microscopic examination of his politics.<p>
Rove wants us to go ballistic on this one. &nbsp;Don't do it.</p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by mjrecycler</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/scotus-roberts/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:18:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/scotus-roberts/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bush's choices</strong></p><p>Does it seem to anyone else that the Prez tries to do everything in his power to push his ultra-conservative agenda? &nbsp;I know that is his right, but it seems to me that rather than trying to be conciliatory and choosing nominees that are conservatives and yet be acceptable to the other side, he chooses nominees that are the least acceptable to the "opposition" (be it women, enviros, pro-choicers, etc.). &nbsp;He seems to be thumbing his nose at those of us who disagree with him and saying, "nah, nah, look what I'm doing and you can't stop me". &nbsp;It seems to me that the President of the United States should be working to unify the whole country, not just working to force the Republican platform.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bush's choices</strong></p><p>Does it seem to anyone else that the Prez tries to do everything in his power to push his ultra-conservative agenda? &nbsp;I know that is his right, but it seems to me that rather than trying to be conciliatory and choosing nominees that are conservatives and yet be acceptable to the other side, he chooses nominees that are the least acceptable to the "opposition" (be it women, enviros, pro-choicers, etc.). &nbsp;He seems to be thumbing his nose at those of us who disagree with him and saying, "nah, nah, look what I'm doing and you can't stop me". &nbsp;It seems to me that the President of the United States should be working to unify the whole country, not just working to force the Republican platform.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by davedenali</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/scotus-roberts/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:36:10 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/scotus-roberts/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>roberts stinks</strong></p><p>Any environmentalist who doesn't understand how dangerous Roberts is needs to wake up. &nbsp;His snide comments about "hapless toads" came in a decision that threatens the foundation of federal environmental laws. &nbsp;He shares Justice Scalia's constipated reading of the Commerce Clause power, and could undermine federal authority to regulate at all. &nbsp;He may also share Scalia's views on ennvironmentalists' standing to sue at all. &nbsp;He is dangerous and needs to be rejected.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>roberts stinks</strong></p><p>Any environmentalist who doesn't understand how dangerous Roberts is needs to wake up. &nbsp;His snide comments about "hapless toads" came in a decision that threatens the foundation of federal environmental laws. &nbsp;He shares Justice Scalia's constipated reading of the Commerce Clause power, and could undermine federal authority to regulate at all. &nbsp;He may also share Scalia's views on ennvironmentalists' standing to sue at all. &nbsp;He is dangerous and needs to be rejected.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>