<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Fisheries Service releases yet another Northwest salmon recovery plan]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by Wolverine http://www.grist.org/article/salmon11/ Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:33:55 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/salmon11/1 Defective Laws

The Endangered Species Act is defective in that it has loopholes, and this is clearly one of them.  Unfortunately, NOAA Fisheries can infinitely continue to propose ineffective plans like the ones that have already been rejected.  It looks like this population of salmon is history.  We need a greatly strengthened ESA so that these types of shenanigans don't continue (another serious one is allowing Fish & Wildlife Service or NOAA Fisheries to state that a species is in need of protection, yet not add it to the ESA list because the agency is too busy or doesn't have enough money; this is called "warranted but precluded").

]]> Defective Laws

The Endangered Species Act is defective in that it has loopholes, and this is clearly one of them.  Unfortunately, NOAA Fisheries can infinitely continue to propose ineffective plans like the ones that have already been rejected.  It looks like this population of salmon is history.  We need a greatly strengthened ESA so that these types of shenanigans don't continue (another serious one is allowing Fish & Wildlife Service or NOAA Fisheries to state that a species is in need of protection, yet not add it to the ESA list because the agency is too busy or doesn't have enough money; this is called "warranted but precluded").

]]> Comment #2 by amyk http://www.grist.org/article/salmon11/ Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:39:50 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/salmon11/2 Plan doesn't sufficiently consider global warming

There are a number of glaring shortcomings to the administration's latest plan.

But one really stands out -- the plan fails to take the likely regional effects of global warming into account.  It assumes that the period between 1980 and 2001, which generally featured below average ocean and river runoff conditions, is a reasonable surrogate for what the effects of climate change are likely to be.

No basis is provided for this conclusion.  Given what the UW's Climate Impacts Group and others have been saying, the future climate will likely be warmer (and "worse" for salmon) than late 20th century conditions.

So, stronger salmon recovery measures, like removing the four dams on the lower Snake River, deserve serious consideration.

Studies show the dams' limited power can be affordably replaced with conservation and renewables. We should make sure that if these four dams are removed, it is done in a climate-neutral way.

To call on our leaders to come up with a stronger plan that works for salmon and communities, visit www.giveadamforsalmon.org

]]> Plan doesn't sufficiently consider global warming

There are a number of glaring shortcomings to the administration's latest plan.

But one really stands out -- the plan fails to take the likely regional effects of global warming into account.  It assumes that the period between 1980 and 2001, which generally featured below average ocean and river runoff conditions, is a reasonable surrogate for what the effects of climate change are likely to be.

No basis is provided for this conclusion.  Given what the UW's Climate Impacts Group and others have been saying, the future climate will likely be warmer (and "worse" for salmon) than late 20th century conditions.

So, stronger salmon recovery measures, like removing the four dams on the lower Snake River, deserve serious consideration.

Studies show the dams' limited power can be affordably replaced with conservation and renewables. We should make sure that if these four dams are removed, it is done in a climate-neutral way.

To call on our leaders to come up with a stronger plan that works for salmon and communities, visit www.giveadamforsalmon.org

]]>