<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Their reasons aren&#8217;t all that unreasonable]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/rps-as-viewed-from-the-states-of-the-old-confederacy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:33:36 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/rps-as-viewed-from-the-states-of-the-old-confederacy/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Politicians are not engineers</strong></p><p>Last week I had a long conversation with our local public utility about RPS. &nbsp;Turns out we get 85% hydro, 10% nuclear, about 4% from mix biomass sources, and less than 1% coal. &nbsp;They could not make sense of 15% RPS.</p><p>
Why not have the power utilities involved in displacing gas used for other applications, then use that gas to displace coal power? &nbsp;The low hanging fruit is lying on the ground.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Politicians are not engineers</strong></p><p>Last week I had a long conversation with our local public utility about RPS. &nbsp;Turns out we get 85% hydro, 10% nuclear, about 4% from mix biomass sources, and less than 1% coal. &nbsp;They could not make sense of 15% RPS.</p><p>
Why not have the power utilities involved in displacing gas used for other applications, then use that gas to displace coal power? &nbsp;The low hanging fruit is lying on the ground.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Charles Barton</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/rps-as-viewed-from-the-states-of-the-old-confederacy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:46:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/rps-as-viewed-from-the-states-of-the-old-confederacy/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>TVA and renewable energy</strong></p><p>TVA long ago maxed out the hydroelectric potential of the Tennessee River Valley. &nbsp;There are limited renewable energy resources in the Tennessee Valley. &nbsp;The Valley along with the entire Southeastern United States, is very unsuited for Wind generated electricity. &nbsp;The Tennessee Valley lacks geothermal resources. &nbsp;TVA's Wind generating farm is located on Buffalo Mountain, one of the windiest spots in Tennessee. &nbsp;During August, there is enough wind on Buffalo Mountain to generate electricity 7% of the time. &nbsp;Some months there is more wind, but at most Buffalo Mountain generates electricity less than a quarter of the time. &nbsp;This is by the way, tipical of the south east. &nbsp;Solar may some day provide cheap electricity, but that day is not now. &nbsp;TVA does generate 36 percent of its power from green sources, and plans to bring 3 new reactors online in the next 12 years, replacing more coal fired generating plants. &nbsp;</p><p>
So why beat up TVA simply because the Southeast lacks Renewable power generating resources? &nbsp; &nbsp;

<p>Charles Barton</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>TVA and renewable energy</strong></p><p>TVA long ago maxed out the hydroelectric potential of the Tennessee River Valley. &nbsp;There are limited renewable energy resources in the Tennessee Valley. &nbsp;The Valley along with the entire Southeastern United States, is very unsuited for Wind generated electricity. &nbsp;The Tennessee Valley lacks geothermal resources. &nbsp;TVA's Wind generating farm is located on Buffalo Mountain, one of the windiest spots in Tennessee. &nbsp;During August, there is enough wind on Buffalo Mountain to generate electricity 7% of the time. &nbsp;Some months there is more wind, but at most Buffalo Mountain generates electricity less than a quarter of the time. &nbsp;This is by the way, tipical of the south east. &nbsp;Solar may some day provide cheap electricity, but that day is not now. &nbsp;TVA does generate 36 percent of its power from green sources, and plans to bring 3 new reactors online in the next 12 years, replacing more coal fired generating plants. &nbsp;</p><p>
So why beat up TVA simply because the Southeast lacks Renewable power generating resources? &nbsp; &nbsp;

<p>Charles Barton</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>