<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for White House refuses to open email about regulating greenhouse gases]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by Ashley Braun http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/ Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:27:27 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/1 If the White House won't open this email...

how about something a little more 19th century, like a snail-mail letter? That does seem to be more their style.

]]> If the White House won't open this email...

how about something a little more 19th century, like a snail-mail letter? That does seem to be more their style.

]]> Comment #2 by amazingdrx http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/ Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:45:55 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/2 "Monty Python

And the Holy Grail"'s line.  "Run away, run away!"  Basically explains the bush administration on any serious issue.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

]]> "Monty Python

And the Holy Grail"'s line.  "Run away, run away!"  Basically explains the bush administration on any serious issue.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

]]> Comment #3 by Joffan http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/ Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:18:19 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/3 Spring it on 'em

Get somebody from the WH in front of a Congress committee and hand them the document.

If the Justice Dept can serve notice on people, I'm damned sure a document can be delivered with proof to a known address in Washington DC.

Executive privilege. What a joke.

]]> Spring it on 'em

Get somebody from the WH in front of a Congress committee and hand them the document.

If the Justice Dept can serve notice on people, I'm damned sure a document can be delivered with proof to a known address in Washington DC.

Executive privilege. What a joke.

]]> Comment #4 by archigeek http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/ Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:14:29 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/4 Good grief...

...and I thought James Watt and Gail Norton were bad. Amateurs, just amateurs, compared to this corporate whore. Jon Stewart ripped this clown a new the other night. So funny I wanted to slap somebody else in the head.

The mellotron is your friend.

]]> Good grief...

...and I thought James Watt and Gail Norton were bad. Amateurs, just amateurs, compared to this corporate whore. Jon Stewart ripped this clown a new the other night. So funny I wanted to slap somebody else in the head.

The mellotron is your friend.

]]> Comment #5 by amazingdrx http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/ Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:20:51 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/5 Bushy's fed chairman

Is hiding too.  Now the wall street talking heads are saying he needs to raise rates to support the dollar...  to bring oil down.  No fed action, Bernanke only acts when hedge fund "banks" need a bailout.

The idiot that interviewed Sen Cantwell yesterday says about electric cars, "the grid is already going down, how can we plug in electric cars?"

Check out this shill for gas guzzling trying to fence with Sen Cantwell.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=778278561&play= ...

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

]]> Bushy's fed chairman

Is hiding too.  Now the wall street talking heads are saying he needs to raise rates to support the dollar...  to bring oil down.  No fed action, Bernanke only acts when hedge fund "banks" need a bailout.

The idiot that interviewed Sen Cantwell yesterday says about electric cars, "the grid is already going down, how can we plug in electric cars?"

Check out this shill for gas guzzling trying to fence with Sen Cantwell.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=778278561&play= ...

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

]]> Comment #6 by Tricia G http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/ Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:51:45 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/return-to-sender/6 Head in the Sand

Wow. Isn't this just the classic definition of head in the sand behavior? If I can't see it, it doesn't exist.

]]> Head in the Sand

Wow. Isn't this just the classic definition of head in the sand behavior? If I can't see it, it doesn't exist.

]]>