<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Down the bureaucratic rabbit hole with the Corps of Engineers]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/restoring-coastal-restoration/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:02:14 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/restoring-coastal-restoration/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>There's an old sayin'...</strong></p><p>...amongst the architects, landscape architects, city planners, ecological system restoration experts, and evn amongst interior designers...</p><p>
"If the engineers had an ounce of creativity or imagination...then the rest of us would be out of a job."</p><p>
An engineer's duty is to come up with the most efficient and cost-efficient way of construction...all other duties and considerations come second.</p><p>
And, as I know from personal and professional experience...engineers absolutely HATE IT when they have to change their plans later to accomodate a new factor or input, or if they're (gasp) forced to come up with an innovative solution.</p><p>
In fact, only a few of 'em are even capable of comin' up with anything that's new, innovative, or outside established parameters.</p><p>
It just goes against their nature.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>There's an old sayin'...</strong></p><p>...amongst the architects, landscape architects, city planners, ecological system restoration experts, and evn amongst interior designers...</p><p>
"If the engineers had an ounce of creativity or imagination...then the rest of us would be out of a job."</p><p>
An engineer's duty is to come up with the most efficient and cost-efficient way of construction...all other duties and considerations come second.</p><p>
And, as I know from personal and professional experience...engineers absolutely HATE IT when they have to change their plans later to accomodate a new factor or input, or if they're (gasp) forced to come up with an innovative solution.</p><p>
In fact, only a few of 'em are even capable of comin' up with anything that's new, innovative, or outside established parameters.</p><p>
It just goes against their nature.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>