What a disappointing volte face!  (Or is it a flip-flop?)

If AB seems to approve of Greenpeace one moment, then what are his reservations about them the next?  He may indeed be right that some things they have tried to do were counter-productive; but he might try to specify what they are for us.

In fact, Greenpeace strikes me as being a work in progress.  And in the past couple of years, they are making some nice positive developments.  E.g., earlier this year, it was quite impressive, the way their scientists documented new and interesting fauna on the floor of the Bering Sea.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

I love AB, but he's a friggin' CHEF on the FoodTV network!  He's not running for public office!  Who CARES what he thinks about GP?

Honestly, get a life.

No individual raindrop ever considers itself responsible for the flood.

He probably got special deals on seafood orders.  Until he told the truth.  

If he is New York based at all, angering mob run food supply companies is not good for one's health.  He could be sleeping with the fishes, if he isn't more careful.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

In the article he said he'd be willing to go on a boat with Greenpeace to document illegal tuna catches. Rather specific and not a full endorsement of Greenpeace. I also doubt he gets lots of fish from industry groups and he's not based in NYC, he's based in Atlanta.

often are morons.

my business was just featured on the food network and the "talent" from FN was a f-ing joke. His claim to fame if his barbacue sauce with HFCS, nice!