<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for The new administration&#8217;s success with climate policy will depend on where they start]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/questions-of-sequence/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:25:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/questions-of-sequence/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No work...no pollution<p><br>
I don't understand you Greens.<p>
First, you want to tear down the New Industrial State. &nbsp; Then when it self destructs, you want to prop it up with bailouts and works programs.<p>
Look, if homes are cheap, oil is cheap, and food is cheap, then who cares. &nbsp;Just trash all the mortgages, let people live in their houses and give them enough money to eat.<p>
This is why we need to build a "stasis" system not a "transit" system:<p>
<a href="http://www.superstructgame.org/SuperstructView/465" rel="nofollow">http://www.superstructgame.org/SuperstructView/465<p>
The problem isn't that we need fuel to go somewhere else, the problem is that we aren't already in the right place to begin with. &nbsp;If we were already in the right place, then we wouldn't need to go somewhere else, and we'd have no need for fuel, automobiles, congestion, transit systems, airplanes, etc.<br>
</br></p></a></p></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No work...no pollution<p><br>
I don't understand you Greens.<p>
First, you want to tear down the New Industrial State. &nbsp; Then when it self destructs, you want to prop it up with bailouts and works programs.<p>
Look, if homes are cheap, oil is cheap, and food is cheap, then who cares. &nbsp;Just trash all the mortgages, let people live in their houses and give them enough money to eat.<p>
This is why we need to build a "stasis" system not a "transit" system:<p>
<a href="http://www.superstructgame.org/SuperstructView/465" rel="nofollow">http://www.superstructgame.org/SuperstructView/465<p>
The problem isn't that we need fuel to go somewhere else, the problem is that we aren't already in the right place to begin with. &nbsp;If we were already in the right place, then we wouldn't need to go somewhere else, and we'd have no need for fuel, automobiles, congestion, transit systems, airplanes, etc.<br>
</br></p></a></p></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by GreenMom</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/questions-of-sequence/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:33:29 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/questions-of-sequence/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>They'll start with carbon cap-and-trade...</strong></p><p>....and I'll bet they insert into that legislation a free pass from NSR for anyone covered under the cap-and-trade. &nbsp;</p><p>
An interesting question will be whether the bill will be multi-pollutant -- i.e. covering carbon cap-and-trade, but including NOx and SO2 trading as well (a la EPA's recently struck-down Clean Air Interstate Rule).</p><p>
I'm not sure how that all fits together, but it'd be interesting to watch it all unfold.</p><p>
Thank goodness (in advance) for Henry Waxman. &nbsp;If this all happens successfully, it'll be because of him. &nbsp;Oh, and Ed Markey too.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>They'll start with carbon cap-and-trade...</strong></p><p>....and I'll bet they insert into that legislation a free pass from NSR for anyone covered under the cap-and-trade. &nbsp;</p><p>
An interesting question will be whether the bill will be multi-pollutant -- i.e. covering carbon cap-and-trade, but including NOx and SO2 trading as well (a la EPA's recently struck-down Clean Air Interstate Rule).</p><p>
I'm not sure how that all fits together, but it'd be interesting to watch it all unfold.</p><p>
Thank goodness (in advance) for Henry Waxman. &nbsp;If this all happens successfully, it'll be because of him. &nbsp;Oh, and Ed Markey too.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/questions-of-sequence/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:53:45 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/questions-of-sequence/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Can democracy survive complexity ....<p>

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Can democracy survive complexity ....<p>

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>