<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Edwards would auction 100 percent of pollution permits; welcomes Obama to the auction fold]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by ac5p</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/prime-mover/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:31:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/prime-mover/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What about Dodd and his tax?</strong></p><p>Isn't that progressive enough? &nbsp;Or does he not count?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What about Dodd and his tax?</strong></p><p>Isn't that progressive enough? &nbsp;Or does he not count?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/prime-mover/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:01:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/prime-mover/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Only Hillary counts, apparently.</strong></p><p>It is no surprise that John Edwards has been brilliant, on this as on a number of other issues. &nbsp;Nor is it surprising that Barack Obama, in his good time, has come up with something impressive.</p><p>
What should surprise us is that over 50% of Democrats are falling into line behind Hillary Rodham Clinton. &nbsp;Sure, she is intelligent, and sure she is politically astute and shrewd. &nbsp;But is that all that Democrats are looking for?

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Only Hillary counts, apparently.</strong></p><p>It is no surprise that John Edwards has been brilliant, on this as on a number of other issues. &nbsp;Nor is it surprising that Barack Obama, in his good time, has come up with something impressive.</p><p>
What should surprise us is that over 50% of Democrats are falling into line behind Hillary Rodham Clinton. &nbsp;Sure, she is intelligent, and sure she is politically astute and shrewd. &nbsp;But is that all that Democrats are looking for?

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by okamichan13</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/prime-mover/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:23:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/prime-mover/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Environmental endorsement for Edwards<p>His stances on the environment seem to be winning him some support.<p>
See the endorsement today from Friends of the Earth action:<p>
<a href="http://www.johnedwards.com/news/headlines/20071014-foea-endorsement/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnedwards.com/news/headlines/20071014-foea-e ...<p>
and interesting that they chose his rejection of nuclear energy as part of the reason. There's a clear difference here that hasn't been talked about much.</p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Environmental endorsement for Edwards<p>His stances on the environment seem to be winning him some support.<p>
See the endorsement today from Friends of the Earth action:<p>
<a href="http://www.johnedwards.com/news/headlines/20071014-foea-endorsement/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnedwards.com/news/headlines/20071014-foea-e ...<p>
and interesting that they chose his rejection of nuclear energy as part of the reason. There's a clear difference here that hasn't been talked about much.</p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>