<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for A conversation with Michael Pollan]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by amc89</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:57:15 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>living near a farmer's market</strong></p><p>I still haven't read Pollan's book but I'm glad he's out there and having an impact. My apartment is a 10 minute bike ride from my local farmer's market. Since I've moved here I've never eaten so many fresh and local fruits and vegetables. I feel great, and I think I've saved a bit of money from not buying produce at the grocery store. Sometimes I still go to Whole Foods, and I've also noticed that there's a more significant amount of local produce there than before, so good job Mr. Pollan!</p><p>
"Then there's this idea that food is something you can endlessly fragment: if you find something in a food that's beneficial, you can isolate it, and concentrate it, and put it in a pill."</p><p>
This is so true, I think it's because Americans are so afraid to eat fresh vegetables and too many companies are eager to take advantage of that and market miracle pills to the public. &nbsp;The only pill I take is vitamin B12 since I don't eat animal products. Pretty much everything else you can get from fresh produce, grains, legumes, nuts, and in the case of vitamin D, the sun. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>living near a farmer's market</strong></p><p>I still haven't read Pollan's book but I'm glad he's out there and having an impact. My apartment is a 10 minute bike ride from my local farmer's market. Since I've moved here I've never eaten so many fresh and local fruits and vegetables. I feel great, and I think I've saved a bit of money from not buying produce at the grocery store. Sometimes I still go to Whole Foods, and I've also noticed that there's a more significant amount of local produce there than before, so good job Mr. Pollan!</p><p>
"Then there's this idea that food is something you can endlessly fragment: if you find something in a food that's beneficial, you can isolate it, and concentrate it, and put it in a pill."</p><p>
This is so true, I think it's because Americans are so afraid to eat fresh vegetables and too many companies are eager to take advantage of that and market miracle pills to the public. &nbsp;The only pill I take is vitamin B12 since I don't eat animal products. Pretty much everything else you can get from fresh produce, grains, legumes, nuts, and in the case of vitamin D, the sun. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Farm Bill Girl</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:06:19 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great Interview<p>Wonderful to see two of the best writers on this subject conversing.<p>
While I work with family farmers, it IS great to see such awareness about the Farm Bill by such a diverse bunch of interests, from religious, to enviro, to nutrition/public health.<p>
Unfortunately, much of the reformers efforts, led by the "Left-Right" Coalition that includes Oxfam, Club for Growth, Environmental Working Group (with their highly misleading database), Bread for the World, have led to simply demonizing subsidies and suggesting we deregulate the price of commodities and shift subsidies to "good nutritious" crops. The right wing that hates welfare don't like subsidies either because they "distort" free trade and they are looking for more globalization/free trade and for the Doha Round, currently being held up because of our farm subsidies, to proceed.<p>
People should know it's not farmers who really benefit from subsidies. It's the BUYERS and PROCESSORS who benefit, namely ADM/Cargill who make high fructose corn syrup and factory farms, who want cheap cheap feed to expand industrial CAFOs. Because we let the "free market" set the price, instead of putting a price floor under commodities (akin to a min wage for workers) and regulating the supply of corn, we let corn prices fall as low as it can go, which causes overproduction and the need for subsidies. Contrary to myth, subsidies do NOT cause overproduction. they are a REACTION to overproduction.<p>
Abolish or reduce subsidies, and you will see prices collapse for corn, soybeans, etc. That means even CHEAPER high fructose corn syrup and more profits for ADM and low cost junk food. It also means the continuation of cheap feed for factory farms, thus why Smithfield and Tyson are so mad about higher corn prices right now. Those outcomes, presumably, would not be to the liking of nutrition folks nor environmentalists, but that is the type of "reform" proposals they are pushing! I think many of these well-meaning groups simply do not realize what will be the outcome of their proposals, and instead, focus on "Millionaire" farmers or farmers in NY receiving "subsidies" when the real devils in the system are multinationals like Cargill, ADM, Tyson, Monsanto. Not the idiot in NYC collecting a $200 conservation payment.<p>
The other huge issue is Doha/WTO. Many of the reformers purport wanting to see more "local food" and "healthy food". But by reducing commodity subsidies to be more "WTO Trade compliant", they are basically helping to jumpstart the WTO talks and more "free trade", which is directly contrary to the goals of the local and healthy food movement! Free trade means supermarkets/food processors/restaurants will purchase the cheapest food/ingredients possible. Wal-mart would rather import apples and vegetables from Mexico/Chile/China than buy it from 10 miles away because of cost. Thanks to NAFTA and FTAs with Chile and the entry of China into the WTO, this is the situation we now have with many specialty crop farmers being put out of business because of the flood of cheap imports. <p>
See the excellent "Crops in Crisis" series from Food and Water Watch.<p>
<a href="http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/foodandglobaltrade/crops-in-crisis" rel="nofollow">http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/foodandglobaltrade/ ...<p>
So how "reformers" can claim to be for healthy and local food, while also espousing reform in the name of being more "WTO compliant" and the need for more free trade is beyond me, but this was what Ron Kind's agenda was when he introduced his "reformist" efforts backed by many well-intention groups. &nbsp;<p>
For what good policy would look like (including price floors, supply management, breakup of corporate consolidatation of food supply), I would refer to the Institute on Agriculture and Trade Policy and their wonderful booklets on the Farm Bill:<p>
<a href="http://iatp.org/" rel="nofollow">http://iatp.org/<p>
And thanks for the great interview.</p></a></p></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great Interview<p>Wonderful to see two of the best writers on this subject conversing.<p>
While I work with family farmers, it IS great to see such awareness about the Farm Bill by such a diverse bunch of interests, from religious, to enviro, to nutrition/public health.<p>
Unfortunately, much of the reformers efforts, led by the "Left-Right" Coalition that includes Oxfam, Club for Growth, Environmental Working Group (with their highly misleading database), Bread for the World, have led to simply demonizing subsidies and suggesting we deregulate the price of commodities and shift subsidies to "good nutritious" crops. The right wing that hates welfare don't like subsidies either because they "distort" free trade and they are looking for more globalization/free trade and for the Doha Round, currently being held up because of our farm subsidies, to proceed.<p>
People should know it's not farmers who really benefit from subsidies. It's the BUYERS and PROCESSORS who benefit, namely ADM/Cargill who make high fructose corn syrup and factory farms, who want cheap cheap feed to expand industrial CAFOs. Because we let the "free market" set the price, instead of putting a price floor under commodities (akin to a min wage for workers) and regulating the supply of corn, we let corn prices fall as low as it can go, which causes overproduction and the need for subsidies. Contrary to myth, subsidies do NOT cause overproduction. they are a REACTION to overproduction.<p>
Abolish or reduce subsidies, and you will see prices collapse for corn, soybeans, etc. That means even CHEAPER high fructose corn syrup and more profits for ADM and low cost junk food. It also means the continuation of cheap feed for factory farms, thus why Smithfield and Tyson are so mad about higher corn prices right now. Those outcomes, presumably, would not be to the liking of nutrition folks nor environmentalists, but that is the type of "reform" proposals they are pushing! I think many of these well-meaning groups simply do not realize what will be the outcome of their proposals, and instead, focus on "Millionaire" farmers or farmers in NY receiving "subsidies" when the real devils in the system are multinationals like Cargill, ADM, Tyson, Monsanto. Not the idiot in NYC collecting a $200 conservation payment.<p>
The other huge issue is Doha/WTO. Many of the reformers purport wanting to see more "local food" and "healthy food". But by reducing commodity subsidies to be more "WTO Trade compliant", they are basically helping to jumpstart the WTO talks and more "free trade", which is directly contrary to the goals of the local and healthy food movement! Free trade means supermarkets/food processors/restaurants will purchase the cheapest food/ingredients possible. Wal-mart would rather import apples and vegetables from Mexico/Chile/China than buy it from 10 miles away because of cost. Thanks to NAFTA and FTAs with Chile and the entry of China into the WTO, this is the situation we now have with many specialty crop farmers being put out of business because of the flood of cheap imports. <p>
See the excellent "Crops in Crisis" series from Food and Water Watch.<p>
<a href="http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/foodandglobaltrade/crops-in-crisis" rel="nofollow">http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/foodandglobaltrade/ ...<p>
So how "reformers" can claim to be for healthy and local food, while also espousing reform in the name of being more "WTO compliant" and the need for more free trade is beyond me, but this was what Ron Kind's agenda was when he introduced his "reformist" efforts backed by many well-intention groups. &nbsp;<p>
For what good policy would look like (including price floors, supply management, breakup of corporate consolidatation of food supply), I would refer to the Institute on Agriculture and Trade Policy and their wonderful booklets on the Farm Bill:<p>
<a href="http://iatp.org/" rel="nofollow">http://iatp.org/<p>
And thanks for the great interview.</p></a></p></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Farm Bill Girl</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:13:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Addendum</strong></p><p>In regards to the defensiveness of farmers, it is true that there are progressive family farmers who do not like the current system, do not like subsidies and wanted REAL reform , but that the dangerous reforms being offered by outside parties would make a broken system even worse, so farm groups were forced to prefer the [still broken] status quo over even worse reform.</p><p>
I will say that thanks to the awareness raised by the "reformers", we did get a better bill, with more funding for food stamps, specialty crops, minority farmers, farmers markets, etc. And i think they deserve credit for that. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Addendum</strong></p><p>In regards to the defensiveness of farmers, it is true that there are progressive family farmers who do not like the current system, do not like subsidies and wanted REAL reform , but that the dangerous reforms being offered by outside parties would make a broken system even worse, so farm groups were forced to prefer the [still broken] status quo over even worse reform.</p><p>
I will say that thanks to the awareness raised by the "reformers", we did get a better bill, with more funding for food stamps, specialty crops, minority farmers, farmers markets, etc. And i think they deserve credit for that. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Farmers Union</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Irene, please spare me...</strong></p><p>I have read your posts on Kos and I am really tired of your self-righteous "I know the farmers" shtick. It's getting old. I know you know some farmers that would be hurt if subsidies were abolished but so what? Your constant refrain about your farmer friends knowing best reminds me of the interviews with soldiers in Iraq who are so passionate about how we must stay in Iraq and continue the fight etc... Are we supposed to take their word for it because they are soldiers and we must defer to their wisdom?</p><p>
Of course not, they like your farmer friends only see a microcosmic representation of the whole. There are many reasons all of the groups you reference (Oxfam, Club for Growth, Environmental Working Group etc) are aiming to kill agricultural subsides and it's not because they don't see something only you can understand. Your myopic allegiance to a few farmers you know has so tainted your views on this issue as to make your points somewhat irrelevant. </p><p>
I know many farmers who would love to see these subsidies eliminated. </p><p>
In the future would you please refrain from representing all the "family farmers" There are many progressive family farmers you don't speak for.</p><p>
Farmers Union<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Irene, please spare me...</strong></p><p>I have read your posts on Kos and I am really tired of your self-righteous "I know the farmers" shtick. It's getting old. I know you know some farmers that would be hurt if subsidies were abolished but so what? Your constant refrain about your farmer friends knowing best reminds me of the interviews with soldiers in Iraq who are so passionate about how we must stay in Iraq and continue the fight etc... Are we supposed to take their word for it because they are soldiers and we must defer to their wisdom?</p><p>
Of course not, they like your farmer friends only see a microcosmic representation of the whole. There are many reasons all of the groups you reference (Oxfam, Club for Growth, Environmental Working Group etc) are aiming to kill agricultural subsides and it's not because they don't see something only you can understand. Your myopic allegiance to a few farmers you know has so tainted your views on this issue as to make your points somewhat irrelevant. </p><p>
I know many farmers who would love to see these subsidies eliminated. </p><p>
In the future would you please refrain from representing all the "family farmers" There are many progressive family farmers you don't speak for.</p><p>
Farmers Union<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Farm Bill Girl</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:51:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Why don't you address the subject at hand?<p>instead of engaging in attacks?<p>
for the record, most farmers I know would prefer not to receive subsidies and we agree, let's kill subsidies. All farmers will tell you they prefer to receive income from the marketplace vs. the government, regardless whether they are Farm Bureau types or more progressive farmer types. The difference is, Farm Bureau folks believe "free markets" work their magic, but still want a subsidy "safety net." Progressive farm activists have long said, get RID of subsidies, but reinstitute a price floor and supply management to stabilize the price. So in other words, both the Oxfam/anti-subsidy critics, along with progressive farm groups, endorse getting rid of subsidies. That was why the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy had a release endorsing this "third way" approach, so move the debate beyond "subsidies" or "no subsidies." The honest farmers don't want government money. they want ADM/Cargill to pay a fair price. <p>
and it is true, take away the subsidies and don't institute a price floor, and you will get more factory farms and more cheap HFCS. those are issues the "reform" coalition has yet to address or understand. now should there be payment limits and getting rid of loopholes on subsidies? yeah sure. But it will only make a dent in the corporate control of our food system. to make a real dent, you need a supply management approach, as Tom had written about in a previous column, which you would be wise to read, so you know it's not just me who says such things, but other informed farmers.<p>
<a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/6/23/124311/512" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/6/23/124311/512<p>
I am glad that both Pollan and Tom Philpott understand how ending subsidies is not the simple answer to what needs to be done to fix our food systems.</p></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Why don't you address the subject at hand?<p>instead of engaging in attacks?<p>
for the record, most farmers I know would prefer not to receive subsidies and we agree, let's kill subsidies. All farmers will tell you they prefer to receive income from the marketplace vs. the government, regardless whether they are Farm Bureau types or more progressive farmer types. The difference is, Farm Bureau folks believe "free markets" work their magic, but still want a subsidy "safety net." Progressive farm activists have long said, get RID of subsidies, but reinstitute a price floor and supply management to stabilize the price. So in other words, both the Oxfam/anti-subsidy critics, along with progressive farm groups, endorse getting rid of subsidies. That was why the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy had a release endorsing this "third way" approach, so move the debate beyond "subsidies" or "no subsidies." The honest farmers don't want government money. they want ADM/Cargill to pay a fair price. <p>
and it is true, take away the subsidies and don't institute a price floor, and you will get more factory farms and more cheap HFCS. those are issues the "reform" coalition has yet to address or understand. now should there be payment limits and getting rid of loopholes on subsidies? yeah sure. But it will only make a dent in the corporate control of our food system. to make a real dent, you need a supply management approach, as Tom had written about in a previous column, which you would be wise to read, so you know it's not just me who says such things, but other informed farmers.<p>
<a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/6/23/124311/512" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/6/23/124311/512<p>
I am glad that both Pollan and Tom Philpott understand how ending subsidies is not the simple answer to what needs to be done to fix our food systems.</p></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by kmp</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 05:16:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cooking</strong></p><p>I was interested to see the comment regarding cooking (as opposed to microwaving prepared foods): that most people say that they just don't have the time. &nbsp;I can concur, if the relatively small sample of my friends is representative of the wider population.</p><p>
I've always enjoyed cooking, but have gone through vast stretches of my adult life not really cooking at all. &nbsp;I lived in Boston for many years, in many different apartments, but one had a ridiculously tiny galley kitchen, and the stove/oven had some sort of gas leak we could never get the landlord to fix, so I almost never cooked. &nbsp;When living in Manhattan it's almost too easy not to cook; &nbsp;there is a restaurant or cafe for every imaginable taste &amp; cuisine, and living in Manhattan I was out most every night of the week. &nbsp;Now that I am living in the boonies and I've joined a CSA, I do a lot of cooking. Hands down, I would tell people that if you want to force yourself to get into the habit of cooking, join a CSA. &nbsp;</p><p>
Friends often tell me what a wonderful cook I am - I always tell them it is the ingredients, not my skill as a cook. &nbsp;They lament that they simply have no time for cooking; I tell them to dedicate only one night a week to cooking something from scratch. &nbsp;At least once a week we make a fritatta, in our biggest skillet, with whatever CSA veggies need using up; &nbsp;this will net us 8 small meals that can be heated in the microwave in about 1 minute. &nbsp;The fritatta itself takes about an hour to make; &nbsp;one hour out of the week. &nbsp;One less television show (or, you can even cook with the TV on). &nbsp;</p><p>
Sadly, so far, I have not converted many friends. One friend of mine, who used to be a member of a CSA, but abandoned it as too much work when she had a baby, has recently re-joined, following, she said, my example. &nbsp;Since I've had more time, of late, I've been "preserving the harvest;" doing a lot of canning &amp; drying of harvest fruits &amp; veggies. &nbsp;Since she has more money than time, she brings me extra organic fruit &amp; veggies from her CSA, I transform them into applesauce, or plum preserves, or tomatillo salsa, can them, and give her back a share of the booty. It's been a wonderful way to stay connected, to teach her little girl, who is 3 and a half years old, about cooking, food, and local harvest seasons, and to enjoy the bounty that the Hudson River Valley has to offer.</p><p>
Another good way to convince friends to dust off their rusty whisks is to throw a dinner party and ask each friend to bring a dish that is homemade (and/or local, or organic, or seasonal, or whatever your particular food "thing" is). &nbsp;I had a small dinner party a couple of weeks ago that turned out to be one of those fabulous nights; the food, the wine, the weather, the fire on the deck, and most expeically the company was wonderful. One friend brought a chocoalte-caramel torte that was an "experiment" but turned out to be divine. &nbsp;When another friend asked me what she should bring, I said "use up whatever you have from the CSA this week." &nbsp;She brought a huge platter of roasted root veggies that were a big hit. &nbsp;I did much the same, transforming spinach &amp; sorrel into spinach-sorrel risotto cakes, roasting a delicata squash with parsley &amp; red pepper, grilling bush beans alongside organic chicken (marinated in peach salsa that I put up about a month ago) and making an apple pie.</p><p>
Food is so much more than fuel - the more we remember that, the better off we will be.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cooking</strong></p><p>I was interested to see the comment regarding cooking (as opposed to microwaving prepared foods): that most people say that they just don't have the time. &nbsp;I can concur, if the relatively small sample of my friends is representative of the wider population.</p><p>
I've always enjoyed cooking, but have gone through vast stretches of my adult life not really cooking at all. &nbsp;I lived in Boston for many years, in many different apartments, but one had a ridiculously tiny galley kitchen, and the stove/oven had some sort of gas leak we could never get the landlord to fix, so I almost never cooked. &nbsp;When living in Manhattan it's almost too easy not to cook; &nbsp;there is a restaurant or cafe for every imaginable taste &amp; cuisine, and living in Manhattan I was out most every night of the week. &nbsp;Now that I am living in the boonies and I've joined a CSA, I do a lot of cooking. Hands down, I would tell people that if you want to force yourself to get into the habit of cooking, join a CSA. &nbsp;</p><p>
Friends often tell me what a wonderful cook I am - I always tell them it is the ingredients, not my skill as a cook. &nbsp;They lament that they simply have no time for cooking; I tell them to dedicate only one night a week to cooking something from scratch. &nbsp;At least once a week we make a fritatta, in our biggest skillet, with whatever CSA veggies need using up; &nbsp;this will net us 8 small meals that can be heated in the microwave in about 1 minute. &nbsp;The fritatta itself takes about an hour to make; &nbsp;one hour out of the week. &nbsp;One less television show (or, you can even cook with the TV on). &nbsp;</p><p>
Sadly, so far, I have not converted many friends. One friend of mine, who used to be a member of a CSA, but abandoned it as too much work when she had a baby, has recently re-joined, following, she said, my example. &nbsp;Since I've had more time, of late, I've been "preserving the harvest;" doing a lot of canning &amp; drying of harvest fruits &amp; veggies. &nbsp;Since she has more money than time, she brings me extra organic fruit &amp; veggies from her CSA, I transform them into applesauce, or plum preserves, or tomatillo salsa, can them, and give her back a share of the booty. It's been a wonderful way to stay connected, to teach her little girl, who is 3 and a half years old, about cooking, food, and local harvest seasons, and to enjoy the bounty that the Hudson River Valley has to offer.</p><p>
Another good way to convince friends to dust off their rusty whisks is to throw a dinner party and ask each friend to bring a dish that is homemade (and/or local, or organic, or seasonal, or whatever your particular food "thing" is). &nbsp;I had a small dinner party a couple of weeks ago that turned out to be one of those fabulous nights; the food, the wine, the weather, the fire on the deck, and most expeically the company was wonderful. One friend brought a chocoalte-caramel torte that was an "experiment" but turned out to be divine. &nbsp;When another friend asked me what she should bring, I said "use up whatever you have from the CSA this week." &nbsp;She brought a huge platter of roasted root veggies that were a big hit. &nbsp;I did much the same, transforming spinach &amp; sorrel into spinach-sorrel risotto cakes, roasting a delicata squash with parsley &amp; red pepper, grilling bush beans alongside organic chicken (marinated in peach salsa that I put up about a month ago) and making an apple pie.</p><p>
Food is so much more than fuel - the more we remember that, the better off we will be.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by johnpdeever</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:49:03 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>pls fix typo in caption displaying book</strong></p><p>Pollan, not Pollen. &nbsp;;)</p><p>
great interview</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>pls fix typo in caption displaying book</strong></p><p>Pollan, not Pollen. &nbsp;;)</p><p>
great interview</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by David Snieckus</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:39:51 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>At home Cancer Cure finally made public<p>Here's my two cents:<br>
At Home Breast Cancer Cure Finally Made Public<p>
The number one reason for breast cancer spreading around the world is the way we select, prepare (cook) and eat our food. <p>
Newton, MA (PRWEB) October 17, 2007 -- Since October has been named Breast Cancer month, let's declare, 'Peace with Breast Cancer.' David Snieckus of Newton, MA., Macrobiotic Counselor and Chef for over 30 years says, "Instead of bombarding the tumors with radiation or chemotherapy or invading woman's bodies with a knife, let's begin a more gentle and peaceful way. Let's start by being grateful for our cancer as a messenger for us to address its cause and change our lifestyles!" <p>
We can prevent and actually reverse cancer without doctors and their drugs by strengthening our immune systems! This begins right in our own kitchens with a change in our diets!" NOTE: TIME magazine, Oct. 15th 2007 by Kathleen Kingsbury said that the American diet is one reason breast cancer is spreading around the world. <p>
Cooking or preparing natural whole plant-based foods in our own kitchens is the one simple thing each individual can do every day to prevent and even reverse breast cancer and optimize health and well-being. As we become proficient at selecting, balancing, and preparing such foods, we become our own doctors, our own healers, and our own "health care providers". Furthermore, learning about the best and healthiest foods to eat is the best healthcare reform. As we optimize our health through the food we eat, we become part of the solution in reducing healthcare costs. <p>
David Snieckus, through one-on-one consultations and teachings about ancient principles and the proper selection, cooking and eating of natural whole plant-based foods, can help you launch your path to optimum health. <p>
Mr. Snieckus' vision is every kitchen a wellness center and one peaceful and healthy world. He invites and welcomes everyone and anyone to be a part of that vision. <p>
For more information, call for the no-obligation program outline and references at 617-964-2951, or visit: <a href="http://www.davidsnieckus.com" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidsnieckus.com. <p>
David Snieckus, a graduate of the world renowned Kushi Institute, is the primary sponsor of House Bill 2841 which calls for the removal of the tax exemption of processed food. <p>
David Snieckus<br>
99 Crescent Street<br>
Newton, MA 02466<br>
617-964-2951 <br>
info @ davidsnieckus.com<br>
<a href="http://www.davidsnieckus.com" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidsnieckus.com <p>
# # # <br>
</br></p></a></br></br></br></br></br></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>At home Cancer Cure finally made public<p>Here's my two cents:<br>
At Home Breast Cancer Cure Finally Made Public<p>
The number one reason for breast cancer spreading around the world is the way we select, prepare (cook) and eat our food. <p>
Newton, MA (PRWEB) October 17, 2007 -- Since October has been named Breast Cancer month, let's declare, 'Peace with Breast Cancer.' David Snieckus of Newton, MA., Macrobiotic Counselor and Chef for over 30 years says, "Instead of bombarding the tumors with radiation or chemotherapy or invading woman's bodies with a knife, let's begin a more gentle and peaceful way. Let's start by being grateful for our cancer as a messenger for us to address its cause and change our lifestyles!" <p>
We can prevent and actually reverse cancer without doctors and their drugs by strengthening our immune systems! This begins right in our own kitchens with a change in our diets!" NOTE: TIME magazine, Oct. 15th 2007 by Kathleen Kingsbury said that the American diet is one reason breast cancer is spreading around the world. <p>
Cooking or preparing natural whole plant-based foods in our own kitchens is the one simple thing each individual can do every day to prevent and even reverse breast cancer and optimize health and well-being. As we become proficient at selecting, balancing, and preparing such foods, we become our own doctors, our own healers, and our own "health care providers". Furthermore, learning about the best and healthiest foods to eat is the best healthcare reform. As we optimize our health through the food we eat, we become part of the solution in reducing healthcare costs. <p>
David Snieckus, through one-on-one consultations and teachings about ancient principles and the proper selection, cooking and eating of natural whole plant-based foods, can help you launch your path to optimum health. <p>
Mr. Snieckus' vision is every kitchen a wellness center and one peaceful and healthy world. He invites and welcomes everyone and anyone to be a part of that vision. <p>
For more information, call for the no-obligation program outline and references at 617-964-2951, or visit: <a href="http://www.davidsnieckus.com" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidsnieckus.com. <p>
David Snieckus, a graduate of the world renowned Kushi Institute, is the primary sponsor of House Bill 2841 which calls for the removal of the tax exemption of processed food. <p>
David Snieckus<br>
99 Crescent Street<br>
Newton, MA 02466<br>
617-964-2951 <br>
info @ davidsnieckus.com<br>
<a href="http://www.davidsnieckus.com" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidsnieckus.com <p>
# # # <br>
</br></p></a></br></br></br></br></br></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by PermieWriter</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:56:58 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What's with the carrots?</strong></p><p>In his email alerting his readers about this article, Pollan warned us that there is a scary photo. He was right. What's with those carrots? And the lab coat? Photographers get weird ideas, as Dave Barry has been wont to complain.</p><p>
I'm so excited about about how Pollan has catalyzed a food revolution in America. It's gotten so much easier to talk to folks about these issues. "Here, read this," is so much simpler than giving them the manifesto verbally. Great stuff.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What's with the carrots?</strong></p><p>In his email alerting his readers about this article, Pollan warned us that there is a scary photo. He was right. What's with those carrots? And the lab coat? Photographers get weird ideas, as Dave Barry has been wont to complain.</p><p>
I'm so excited about about how Pollan has catalyzed a food revolution in America. It's gotten so much easier to talk to folks about these issues. "Here, read this," is so much simpler than giving them the manifesto verbally. Great stuff.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by CyberBrook</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:38:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Eat food, not too much, mostly plants...<p><b><p>
Michael Pollan's advice: <p>
"Eat food, not too much, mostly plants... <p>
the best decisions for your health turn out to be the best decisions for the farmer and the best decisions for the environment"<p>
That's essentially eco-eating (<a href="http://www.brook.com/veg" rel="nofollow">http://www.brook.com/veg)!<p>
</p></a></p></p></p></p></b></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Eat food, not too much, mostly plants...<p><b><p>
Michael Pollan's advice: <p>
"Eat food, not too much, mostly plants... <p>
the best decisions for your health turn out to be the best decisions for the farmer and the best decisions for the environment"<p>
That's essentially eco-eating (<a href="http://www.brook.com/veg" rel="nofollow">http://www.brook.com/veg)!<p>
</p></a></p></p></p></p></b></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by srschnur</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:07:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/pollan/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Framing the subsidy discussion</strong></p><p>As with so many subsidies in the US, corporations are the ones benefiting. &nbsp;However, a strong argument can be made for subsidies. &nbsp;It is absolutely vital (for every nation, not just ours) to be able to feed its own citizens. &nbsp;The subsidies should go to farms near cities where property prices are so high a farmer can make lots more money by selling to a developer. &nbsp;Subsidies might also go to the ensuing farmer's markets.</p><p>
By the way, Does anyone know whether the drive to a farmer's market wipes out (in energy use) the virtue of buying vegies grown close to home? &nbsp;I estimate going to a farmer's market does not eliminate the need to go to a Supermarket, so it is an extra automobile trip.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Framing the subsidy discussion</strong></p><p>As with so many subsidies in the US, corporations are the ones benefiting. &nbsp;However, a strong argument can be made for subsidies. &nbsp;It is absolutely vital (for every nation, not just ours) to be able to feed its own citizens. &nbsp;The subsidies should go to farms near cities where property prices are so high a farmer can make lots more money by selling to a developer. &nbsp;Subsidies might also go to the ensuing farmer's markets.</p><p>
By the way, Does anyone know whether the drive to a farmer's market wipes out (in energy use) the virtue of buying vegies grown close to home? &nbsp;I estimate going to a farmer's market does not eliminate the need to go to a Supermarket, so it is an extra automobile trip.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>