<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Election-week polls find voters support both clean energy and offshore drilling]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by swan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/poll-dancing/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:25:11 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/poll-dancing/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The problem with drilling</strong></p><p>I wonder if the people who said they would favor more drilling understand what that means. What they are proposing would not affect usable oil supplies for ten years! That is trading out an environment disaster for a small, distant return. Only if the respondents are informed does a poll really mean anything.

<p>http://goodwordswan.wildflowerstew.com</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The problem with drilling</strong></p><p>I wonder if the people who said they would favor more drilling understand what that means. What they are proposing would not affect usable oil supplies for ten years! That is trading out an environment disaster for a small, distant return. Only if the respondents are informed does a poll really mean anything.

<p>http://goodwordswan.wildflowerstew.com</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>