Hansen is Beria of the Gulag Archipelago of fear that naturogenic climate scientists must subject to.  His powers to suppress real science and substitute "policy" have pushed back scientific understanding in our country by decades.

His stewardship has singlehandedly reduced analysis to placard holding.  

You got no idea of science.

Jabailo,

You must provide an example of where Hansen has recently been wrong in his general central thesis.  And you cant site the normal stuff that changes at the edges of our understanding.  I'm talking central thesis here.

When you gather even 1/3 as many climate scientists that disagree with the central thesis of AGW as who advocate it, then I will start to listen.

Until then, why don't you use your skeptical nature to help keep the discussions of information that IS in flux at the edges of the subject (like hurricanes) honest and free of fluff?

That would be a productive role here rather than a destructive one.

Remember, at this point in time, you will have zero impact on whether carbon emissions get heavily regulated in the US and around the world.   So why not turn your skepticism into something helpful for all of us?

That was the best part of Hansen's comments.  The illegitimate abuse of freedom of speech, by lying, is a big part of the global warming problem.  Freedom of speech has been taken way too far when it applies to things like lying and advertising, though I'm being redundant.  Look out John Bailo, they'll be coming for you!