<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Palm oil may be certified sustainable, some greens skeptical]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Wolverine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/palm/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/palm/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Worse Than Petroleum</strong></p><p>Destroying rainforests in order to grow crops like palm trees for biofuels is generally more ecologically destructive than drilling for oil, though it depends on what has been destroyed in order to drill for the oil. &nbsp;On top of that, biofuels emit even more greenhouse gases when burned than petroleum, so biofuels do nothing to combat human-caused global warming. &nbsp;(Burning ANY fuel emits gases; the best result you can get is emission of purely carbon dioxide, which is the most prominent greenhouse gas.)</p><p>
Unfortunately, many well-meaning people have been bamboozled by the biofuel industry and think biofuels are some sort of magic panacea that will solve all the environmental and ecological problems caused by driving. &nbsp;WRONG!!! &nbsp;The only way to solve these problems is to stop, or at least greatly reduce, driving. &nbsp;Sorry kids, magical solutions only exist on TV and in the movies (I assume no one reads anymore).</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Worse Than Petroleum</strong></p><p>Destroying rainforests in order to grow crops like palm trees for biofuels is generally more ecologically destructive than drilling for oil, though it depends on what has been destroyed in order to drill for the oil. &nbsp;On top of that, biofuels emit even more greenhouse gases when burned than petroleum, so biofuels do nothing to combat human-caused global warming. &nbsp;(Burning ANY fuel emits gases; the best result you can get is emission of purely carbon dioxide, which is the most prominent greenhouse gas.)</p><p>
Unfortunately, many well-meaning people have been bamboozled by the biofuel industry and think biofuels are some sort of magic panacea that will solve all the environmental and ecological problems caused by driving. &nbsp;WRONG!!! &nbsp;The only way to solve these problems is to stop, or at least greatly reduce, driving. &nbsp;Sorry kids, magical solutions only exist on TV and in the movies (I assume no one reads anymore).</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by John former Marine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/palm/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:22:53 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/palm/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wolverine, you're missing the point...</strong></p><p>What's important here is that the deforestation and palm plantation is going on in Indonesia. &nbsp;If they said that they were going to deforest the entire state of Maine for biofuel production, I'd be concerned. &nbsp;As it is, now when I'm rich, I can buy my vacation home up there on the coast and have beautiful views of spruce-covered mountains unobstructed by nasty wind turbines. &nbsp;Let the Indonesians pay the consequences for our massive energy consumption!</p><p>
And if you disagree with what I'm saying here, let me remind you "you're either with us, or against us." &nbsp;Besides, I'm sure those Indonesians are more than happy to have well-paying, unionized jobs working in the palm plantations for like $30/hr. &nbsp;Hell, they probably make more money than I do!</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wolverine, you're missing the point...</strong></p><p>What's important here is that the deforestation and palm plantation is going on in Indonesia. &nbsp;If they said that they were going to deforest the entire state of Maine for biofuel production, I'd be concerned. &nbsp;As it is, now when I'm rich, I can buy my vacation home up there on the coast and have beautiful views of spruce-covered mountains unobstructed by nasty wind turbines. &nbsp;Let the Indonesians pay the consequences for our massive energy consumption!</p><p>
And if you disagree with what I'm saying here, let me remind you "you're either with us, or against us." &nbsp;Besides, I'm sure those Indonesians are more than happy to have well-paying, unionized jobs working in the palm plantations for like $30/hr. &nbsp;Hell, they probably make more money than I do!</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/palm/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:39:48 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/palm/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>If you're gonna say Rueters<p>Then please link to Rueters.<br>
<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUKKLR9741720071121" rel="nofollow">http://uk.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUKKLR9741 ...</a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>If you're gonna say Rueters<p>Then please link to Rueters.<br>
<a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUKKLR9741720071121" rel="nofollow">http://uk.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUKKLR9741 ...</a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>