<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Australia national government transforms; conservative party falls apart]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:22:54 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Israel?...</strong></p><p>I though Israel had also rejected the Kyoto Treaty?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Israel?...</strong></p><p>I though Israel had also rejected the Kyoto Treaty?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:47:21 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Odd if true, Israel can not survive global warming</strong></p><p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Odd if true, Israel can not survive global warming</strong></p><p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Maywa Montenegro</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:02:48 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Re: I feel so proud<p>Me too. Several months ago, I interviewed several experts in Australia to write a story about it's crippling. What <a href="http://seedmagazine.com/news/2007/10/the_climate_crucible.php" rel="nofollow">the piece turned into was one about cultural climate change more than anything else. Awesome.</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Re: I feel so proud<p>Me too. Several months ago, I interviewed several experts in Australia to write a story about it's crippling. What <a href="http://seedmagazine.com/news/2007/10/the_climate_crucible.php" rel="nofollow">the piece turned into was one about cultural climate change more than anything else. Awesome.</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by tico89</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:31:58 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Congratulations, Australia</strong></p><p>(Words I thought would never cross my lips...)</p><p>
I just wish the new PM had a more positive-sounding name...K. Rudd doesn't really encourage optimism about the country's future...</p><p>
Just a minor point - isn't "supports the Kyoto Protocol" a bit of a woolly phrase? It seems to me there's a wide variation of possible stances on Kyoto - such as signed but pending ratification (is that supporting or not), or passed in some branches of the government but not in all. As I said, just a minor point, but one that often occurs to me when people talk about "supporting".</p><p>
It's amazing the way the government has completely altered over the course of one election, although it could have been easily predicted looking at the trends in previous years. Does this mean there's no more space for ostriches like Howard? I wonder if something similar can happen in the next US elections...

<p>If I share initials with 'Global Warming', is that a sign?</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Congratulations, Australia</strong></p><p>(Words I thought would never cross my lips...)</p><p>
I just wish the new PM had a more positive-sounding name...K. Rudd doesn't really encourage optimism about the country's future...</p><p>
Just a minor point - isn't "supports the Kyoto Protocol" a bit of a woolly phrase? It seems to me there's a wide variation of possible stances on Kyoto - such as signed but pending ratification (is that supporting or not), or passed in some branches of the government but not in all. As I said, just a minor point, but one that often occurs to me when people talk about "supporting".</p><p>
It's amazing the way the government has completely altered over the course of one election, although it could have been easily predicted looking at the trends in previous years. Does this mean there's no more space for ostriches like Howard? I wonder if something similar can happen in the next US elections...

<p>If I share initials with 'Global Warming', is that a sign?</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by NSaggie</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:53:07 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Blame Canada</strong></p><p>I suspect my countries Prime Minister will be a chum to the USA in Bali. </p><p>
He's giving us the standard double talk. We're gonna lead, but we won't sign onto any new binding targets unless everyone else does too. Let's not forget he called Kyoto a socialist scheme to steal from the rich and give to the poor. His Government has proved as much in their action. </p><p>
Even while the large majority support international agreements, perhaps he will be the second Leader to fall to the green tide. I can only hope so.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Blame Canada</strong></p><p>I suspect my countries Prime Minister will be a chum to the USA in Bali. </p><p>
He's giving us the standard double talk. We're gonna lead, but we won't sign onto any new binding targets unless everyone else does too. Let's not forget he called Kyoto a socialist scheme to steal from the rich and give to the poor. His Government has proved as much in their action. </p><p>
Even while the large majority support international agreements, perhaps he will be the second Leader to fall to the green tide. I can only hope so.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by Craig Allen</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:56:33 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The Prime Minister of Oz has signed Kyoto!<p>Cheers David for turning my comment into a post!<p>
Well, it's official, Prime Minister Rudd has <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/rudd-ratifies-kyoto/2007/12/03/1196530553722.html" rel="nofollow">ratified the Kyoto Protocol.<p>
I think it is also worth noting the <a href="http://www.alp.org.au/media/1107/msloo143.php" rel="nofollow">other greenhouse related commitments of the Australian government :<p>
<br>
Signing the Kyoto agreement and working with other nations to move beyond it.<br>
Implement an emissions trading scheme by 2010.<br>
Achieving a national renewable energy target of 20% by 2020.<br>
Reducing greenhouse emission by 60% by 2050.<br>
Commitments to short and medium term targets once the draft of the <a href="http://www.garnautreview.org.au/CA25734E0016A131/pages/home" rel="nofollow">Garnaut Report is released in June next year. (The Garnaut report being Australia's version of the Stern Report.)<br>
AUD$500 million - to develop, commercialize and deploy renewable energy.<br>
AUD$500 million - to the develop and deploy 'clean' coal technologies.<br>
AUD$240 million - for assisting and encouraging business to reduce emissions.<br>
AUD$150 million - to keep our world leading scientists and researchers in Australia, rather than losing them overseas.<br>
AUD$8000 rebates to households for solar power instillations.<br>
AUD$1000 rebates for solar hot water systems.<br>
AUD$500 rebates for gray water piping and rainwater tanks.<br>
AUD$500 rebates to assist landlords to install insulation.<br>
Up to AUD$10,000 per household in low interest green loans for solar systems and water and energy savings measures.<br>
Invest AUD$20 million in a Clean Energy Innovation Center.<br>
Invest in a Green Car Innovation Fund to develop and build green cars in Australia.<br>
<p>
Half of this is allocated to be spent in the the first 3 year term of government. (Remember that Australia has 1/10th the population of the US, so multiply by ten to get a feel for the comparative degree of the commitments.)<p>
The government needs the support of the Greens in the new senate to get their policies through, so that will keep them on their toes.<p>
And as a further demonstration of how committed they are, the Prime Minister, the Minister for Environment, the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Treasurer are all on their way to Bali.<p>
Craig Allen<br>
Forrest, Victoria, Australia</br></p></p></p></p></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></a></br></br></br></br></br></p></a></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The Prime Minister of Oz has signed Kyoto!<p>Cheers David for turning my comment into a post!<p>
Well, it's official, Prime Minister Rudd has <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/rudd-ratifies-kyoto/2007/12/03/1196530553722.html" rel="nofollow">ratified the Kyoto Protocol.<p>
I think it is also worth noting the <a href="http://www.alp.org.au/media/1107/msloo143.php" rel="nofollow">other greenhouse related commitments of the Australian government :<p>
<br>
Signing the Kyoto agreement and working with other nations to move beyond it.<br>
Implement an emissions trading scheme by 2010.<br>
Achieving a national renewable energy target of 20% by 2020.<br>
Reducing greenhouse emission by 60% by 2050.<br>
Commitments to short and medium term targets once the draft of the <a href="http://www.garnautreview.org.au/CA25734E0016A131/pages/home" rel="nofollow">Garnaut Report is released in June next year. (The Garnaut report being Australia's version of the Stern Report.)<br>
AUD$500 million - to develop, commercialize and deploy renewable energy.<br>
AUD$500 million - to the develop and deploy 'clean' coal technologies.<br>
AUD$240 million - for assisting and encouraging business to reduce emissions.<br>
AUD$150 million - to keep our world leading scientists and researchers in Australia, rather than losing them overseas.<br>
AUD$8000 rebates to households for solar power instillations.<br>
AUD$1000 rebates for solar hot water systems.<br>
AUD$500 rebates for gray water piping and rainwater tanks.<br>
AUD$500 rebates to assist landlords to install insulation.<br>
Up to AUD$10,000 per household in low interest green loans for solar systems and water and energy savings measures.<br>
Invest AUD$20 million in a Clean Energy Innovation Center.<br>
Invest in a Green Car Innovation Fund to develop and build green cars in Australia.<br>
<p>
Half of this is allocated to be spent in the the first 3 year term of government. (Remember that Australia has 1/10th the population of the US, so multiply by ten to get a feel for the comparative degree of the commitments.)<p>
The government needs the support of the Greens in the new senate to get their policies through, so that will keep them on their toes.<p>
And as a further demonstration of how committed they are, the Prime Minister, the Minister for Environment, the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Treasurer are all on their way to Bali.<p>
Craig Allen<br>
Forrest, Victoria, Australia</br></p></p></p></p></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></a></br></br></br></br></br></p></a></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:35:04 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Oz, Kyoto and the NYTimes<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-australia-politics.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-austra ...<p>
(Not being a Pac-Rim person, I needed Craig to teach me what "Oz" meant. &nbsp;Being a friend of Dorothy, I find this new association of the name cute but curious.)

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Oz, Kyoto and the NYTimes<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-australia-politics.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-austra ...<p>
(Not being a Pac-Rim person, I needed Craig to teach me what "Oz" meant. &nbsp;Being a friend of Dorothy, I find this new association of the name cute but curious.)

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by Charles Barton</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:16:51 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Kyoto as a sign of good intentions</strong></p><p>Signing the Kyoto agreement is a cheap act for politicians, but does it lead to positive results? &nbsp;Canada is 32% above its Kyoto greenhouse target, and its CO2 emissions are growing, not shrinking. &nbsp;Germany is committed to shutting down electrical generating plants that do not emit greenhouse gas and replacing them with plants that do. </p><p>
Australian greens admit that Australia cannot meet Kyoto targets using renewable energy schemes unless Australians are willing to accept a decreased quality of life, and to move major industries off shore. &nbsp;The irony is that the industries could still emit large amounts of CO2, just not in Australia. &nbsp; &nbsp; 

<p>Charles Barton</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Kyoto as a sign of good intentions</strong></p><p>Signing the Kyoto agreement is a cheap act for politicians, but does it lead to positive results? &nbsp;Canada is 32% above its Kyoto greenhouse target, and its CO2 emissions are growing, not shrinking. &nbsp;Germany is committed to shutting down electrical generating plants that do not emit greenhouse gas and replacing them with plants that do. </p><p>
Australian greens admit that Australia cannot meet Kyoto targets using renewable energy schemes unless Australians are willing to accept a decreased quality of life, and to move major industries off shore. &nbsp;The irony is that the industries could still emit large amounts of CO2, just not in Australia. &nbsp; &nbsp; 

<p>Charles Barton</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by Craig Allen</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:38:37 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That the Australian Greens actually say<p>The Australian Green website has a <a href="http://greens.org.au/ClimateChange" rel="nofollow">section on climate change where you can go to see what they actually do say.<p>
You won't find much about living in caves there.<p>
Although I guess that for many, taking actions such as using more public transport, taking shorter showers or turning on a ceiling fan instead of the air conditioner is considered to be a decreased quality of life.<p>
Then again, at the moment the acute water shortages are impacting on gardens, public amenities like parks and ovals and driving up the cost of both water and electricity, so I guess we get the reduced quality of life if we don't meet our targets also.<p>
Australia desperately needs to convince all countries to collectively reduce emissions. We obviously don't have much chance of being effective at that if we don't get on with reducing our own.</p></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That the Australian Greens actually say<p>The Australian Green website has a <a href="http://greens.org.au/ClimateChange" rel="nofollow">section on climate change where you can go to see what they actually do say.<p>
You won't find much about living in caves there.<p>
Although I guess that for many, taking actions such as using more public transport, taking shorter showers or turning on a ceiling fan instead of the air conditioner is considered to be a decreased quality of life.<p>
Then again, at the moment the acute water shortages are impacting on gardens, public amenities like parks and ovals and driving up the cost of both water and electricity, so I guess we get the reduced quality of life if we don't meet our targets also.<p>
Australia desperately needs to convince all countries to collectively reduce emissions. We obviously don't have much chance of being effective at that if we don't get on with reducing our own.</p></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by robertogreen</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:40:21 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>peter garrett</strong></p><p>a strange dude but one of the great lead singers in rock and roll history. &nbsp;midnight oil's first 5 or 6 albums are brilliant.</p><p>
he's travelling a path previously beaten by joschka fisher--from far leftie to insider. &nbsp;i wonder how that will end.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>peter garrett</strong></p><p>a strange dude but one of the great lead singers in rock and roll history. &nbsp;midnight oil's first 5 or 6 albums are brilliant.</p><p>
he's travelling a path previously beaten by joschka fisher--from far leftie to insider. &nbsp;i wonder how that will end.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by Charles Barton</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:19:06 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/oz-fest/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That the Australian Greens actually say</strong></p><p>On October 10, The Sidney Morning Harold reported on a study commissioned by the Australian Greens and written by Dr Mark Diesendorf found that drastic steps to obtain greater energy efficiency by 2020 would only cut emissions to 13 per cent below 1990 level. &nbsp;To achieve the 30 per cent cut, more controversial measures such as an end to land clearing, a 20 per cent cut in beef production to reduce the effect of methane from cattle, a 50 per cent cut in business and professional immigration, and the elimination or offset of emissions from aluminium smelting would be needed.</p><p>
"One possible response for the aluminium industry would be to move offshore," Diesendorf stated.

<p>Charles Barton</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That the Australian Greens actually say</strong></p><p>On October 10, The Sidney Morning Harold reported on a study commissioned by the Australian Greens and written by Dr Mark Diesendorf found that drastic steps to obtain greater energy efficiency by 2020 would only cut emissions to 13 per cent below 1990 level. &nbsp;To achieve the 30 per cent cut, more controversial measures such as an end to land clearing, a 20 per cent cut in beef production to reduce the effect of methane from cattle, a 50 per cent cut in business and professional immigration, and the elimination or offset of emissions from aluminium smelting would be needed.</p><p>
"One possible response for the aluminium industry would be to move offshore," Diesendorf stated.

<p>Charles Barton</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>