<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Barack Obama reveals details of energy plan in speech today]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by JaphetE</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/obamas-energy-proposal/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:53:35 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/obamas-energy-proposal/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>As much as I love...</strong></p><p>...the attention that the media and Grist is giving Obama and Hillary, I have to say that Obama's plan is not "out in front of the Democratic agenda" since John Edwards included the exact same 25-by-25 line in his energy plan almost 5 months ago. </p><p>
Also, his "political bravery" on saying no to coal, is actually a complete mirage. For one, Edwards said "no new coal plants" over 4 months ago and was labeled a "political suicide" for doing so. I'm no so sure Obama's is any more "brave" for doing it after a major candidate has already done it! </p><p>
The more I rooted around I more I found out that Edwards has had better plans for a long time and only now are Hillary and Obama starting to fall in line behind his lead. I love Obama...but I want someone who isn't afraid to take a stand on some of these issues. 

<p>Hillary is for nuclear. Obama is for coal. Edwards is for neither. Need we say more?</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>As much as I love...</strong></p><p>...the attention that the media and Grist is giving Obama and Hillary, I have to say that Obama's plan is not "out in front of the Democratic agenda" since John Edwards included the exact same 25-by-25 line in his energy plan almost 5 months ago. </p><p>
Also, his "political bravery" on saying no to coal, is actually a complete mirage. For one, Edwards said "no new coal plants" over 4 months ago and was labeled a "political suicide" for doing so. I'm no so sure Obama's is any more "brave" for doing it after a major candidate has already done it! </p><p>
The more I rooted around I more I found out that Edwards has had better plans for a long time and only now are Hillary and Obama starting to fall in line behind his lead. I love Obama...but I want someone who isn't afraid to take a stand on some of these issues. 

<p>Hillary is for nuclear. Obama is for coal. Edwards is for neither. Need we say more?</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>