<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for USDA considers first-ever organic standards for farmed fish]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by davidzet</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/not-so-organic-salmon/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:10:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/not-so-organic-salmon/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>better yet....<p>...would be protecting wild salmon populations by assigning/auctioning property rights and fixing up rivers. Wild salmon IN THE WILD are better for you. Sure, they're going to be more expensive, but who said you had the RIGHT to salmon anyways?<p>
More on the destruction of California's salmon here:<br>
<a href="http://aguanomics.com/search?q=salmon" rel="nofollow">http://aguanomics.com/search?q=salmon</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>better yet....<p>...would be protecting wild salmon populations by assigning/auctioning property rights and fixing up rivers. Wild salmon IN THE WILD are better for you. Sure, they're going to be more expensive, but who said you had the RIGHT to salmon anyways?<p>
More on the destruction of California's salmon here:<br>
<a href="http://aguanomics.com/search?q=salmon" rel="nofollow">http://aguanomics.com/search?q=salmon</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>