<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg announces plans for renewable generation in his city]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/national-clean-energy-summit-hizzoner/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:38:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/national-clean-energy-summit-hizzoner/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Blooming epiphany</strong></p><p>I live in the forest smug with firewood and a passive solar home. &nbsp;Then I was sent on a mission to the San Fransisco bay area to solve huge energy problems ... I went from paradise to hell. &nbsp;All that sprawl, so many cars, so little land, it would be easy to panic. &nbsp;What will they do after oil? &nbsp;The first reaction was to wire it in from distant areas. &nbsp;The scale is beyond imagination, a trillion dollar industry. &nbsp;Doing it with carbon would be certain catastrophic failure. &nbsp;</p><p>
I understand Bloomberg's epiphany and urgency. &nbsp;Perhaps a massive district heating retrofit powered from industrial waste heat, waste biomass, rural solar farms, and seasonal heat storage - as in Sweden - could make the NYC area self reliant and generate millions of local jobs. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Blooming epiphany</strong></p><p>I live in the forest smug with firewood and a passive solar home. &nbsp;Then I was sent on a mission to the San Fransisco bay area to solve huge energy problems ... I went from paradise to hell. &nbsp;All that sprawl, so many cars, so little land, it would be easy to panic. &nbsp;What will they do after oil? &nbsp;The first reaction was to wire it in from distant areas. &nbsp;The scale is beyond imagination, a trillion dollar industry. &nbsp;Doing it with carbon would be certain catastrophic failure. &nbsp;</p><p>
I understand Bloomberg's epiphany and urgency. &nbsp;Perhaps a massive district heating retrofit powered from industrial waste heat, waste biomass, rural solar farms, and seasonal heat storage - as in Sweden - could make the NYC area self reliant and generate millions of local jobs. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Steven T</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/national-clean-energy-summit-hizzoner/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:10:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/national-clean-energy-summit-hizzoner/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yes and no</strong></p><p>David, I'd agree that Bloomberg is an interesting politician -- particularly for a former Republican. &nbsp;He also is the latest in a long line of reformist NYC mayors who have had an outsized influence on national policymaking simply because the Big Apple is, um, so big.</p><p>
That said, I suspect Bloomberg ultimately chose not to make a third party run because his polling told him it would be futile, e.g., he has too much personal baggage for the "demolition derby" of presidential electoral politics. &nbsp;At any rate, deep down he's a decidedly corporate and technocratic "green." &nbsp;Better than being a neanderthal, I suppose, and perhaps the best that we can expect at the national level. &nbsp;But mainly Bloomberg reminds me of how far the Republican party has fallen. &nbsp;Thirty years ago it used to have a number of really interesting reformists who kept the party from going wacko. &nbsp;The collapse of the reformist wing of the party has had wide-ranging consequences for the nation.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yes and no</strong></p><p>David, I'd agree that Bloomberg is an interesting politician -- particularly for a former Republican. &nbsp;He also is the latest in a long line of reformist NYC mayors who have had an outsized influence on national policymaking simply because the Big Apple is, um, so big.</p><p>
That said, I suspect Bloomberg ultimately chose not to make a third party run because his polling told him it would be futile, e.g., he has too much personal baggage for the "demolition derby" of presidential electoral politics. &nbsp;At any rate, deep down he's a decidedly corporate and technocratic "green." &nbsp;Better than being a neanderthal, I suppose, and perhaps the best that we can expect at the national level. &nbsp;But mainly Bloomberg reminds me of how far the Republican party has fallen. &nbsp;Thirty years ago it used to have a number of really interesting reformists who kept the party from going wacko. &nbsp;The collapse of the reformist wing of the party has had wide-ranging consequences for the nation.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>