<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for An interview with Rupert Murdoch about News Corp.&#8216;s new climate strategy]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by argalite</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 03:16:52 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Murdoch and the Klamath</strong></p><p>Too bad Ms. Little didn't bother to ask Mr. Murdoch about his companies ownership of the Klamath hydoelectric dams and the impact these dams have on the west coast salmon fishery and tribal cohesiveness.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Murdoch and the Klamath</strong></p><p>Too bad Ms. Little didn't bother to ask Mr. Murdoch about his companies ownership of the Klamath hydoelectric dams and the impact these dams have on the west coast salmon fishery and tribal cohesiveness.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Lisa Hymas</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 04:11:36 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You mean Warren Buffett?<p>Argalite, I believe you're thinking of <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/daily/2007/05/04/5/index.html" rel="nofollow">Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway holding company owns PacifiCorp, the utility that owns the Klamath River dams. </a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You mean Warren Buffett?<p>Argalite, I believe you're thinking of <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/daily/2007/05/04/5/index.html" rel="nofollow">Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway holding company owns PacifiCorp, the utility that owns the Klamath River dams. </a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 04:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well</strong></p><p>Well,<br>
This is certainly an almost sureal article to read.</p><p>
Me, I'm also originally an Aussie from Alice Springs, so I'm well aware of the mega drought happening in Austrailia.</p><p>
Guess thats what it takes to push people over to the other side. Severe Droughts and and Hurricanes.</p><p>
Not to mention, solid proof that going Green can save your company lots of $.</p><p>
_</p><p>
All I can say is:<br>
I just hope this isn't crocidile tears.</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well</strong></p><p>Well,<br>
This is certainly an almost sureal article to read.</p><p>
Me, I'm also originally an Aussie from Alice Springs, so I'm well aware of the mega drought happening in Austrailia.</p><p>
Guess thats what it takes to push people over to the other side. Severe Droughts and and Hurricanes.</p><p>
Not to mention, solid proof that going Green can save your company lots of $.</p><p>
_</p><p>
All I can say is:<br>
I just hope this isn't crocidile tears.</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by bralessliving</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 05:56:54 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>well...<p>My opinion is that a corporate capitalist can't be green. It's simply impossible. <p>
<a href="http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/267" rel="nofollow">http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/2 ...<p>
I can see it now. The Murdoch Foundation helping to green the planet and humanity since 2007. My grandkids will be like, "Murdoch is a great guy." And I will just tell them to pass me my medicine.<p>
I'm going to take a nap.<p>
Lo</p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>well...<p>My opinion is that a corporate capitalist can't be green. It's simply impossible. <p>
<a href="http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/267" rel="nofollow">http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/2 ...<p>
I can see it now. The Murdoch Foundation helping to green the planet and humanity since 2007. My grandkids will be like, "Murdoch is a great guy." And I will just tell them to pass me my medicine.<p>
I'm going to take a nap.<p>
Lo</p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:04:28 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>My reality is that<p>My opinion is that a corporate capitalist can't be green. It's simply impossible. <p>
My reality is that thats wrong ;D<br>
<a href="http://www.svmg.org/press/articles/010807_msn.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.svmg.org/press/articles/010807_msn.htm</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>My reality is that<p>My opinion is that a corporate capitalist can't be green. It's simply impossible. <p>
My reality is that thats wrong ;D<br>
<a href="http://www.svmg.org/press/articles/010807_msn.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.svmg.org/press/articles/010807_msn.htm</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by desertmother</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:22:25 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;squeeze our own energy use down...&quot;</strong></p><p>Would be interesting to hear how exactly they plan to do this. &nbsp;How does a corporation this size do a 180 degree turnaround and become carbon neutral?<br>
Expanding content to include more coverage of climate change seems the easier course, especially now that the subject has become so popular and accepted. &nbsp;If Murdoch can really do what he plans to do, it could have a huge impact. The Schindler of the climate change movement?</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;squeeze our own energy use down...&quot;</strong></p><p>Would be interesting to hear how exactly they plan to do this. &nbsp;How does a corporation this size do a 180 degree turnaround and become carbon neutral?<br>
Expanding content to include more coverage of climate change seems the easier course, especially now that the subject has become so popular and accepted. &nbsp;If Murdoch can really do what he plans to do, it could have a huge impact. The Schindler of the climate change movement?</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by Lisa Hymas</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:47:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How News Corp. will become carbon neutral<p>There's more info on this in the <a href="http://grist.org/news/maindish/2007/05/09/murdoch/" rel="nofollow">article we ran last week: "The company will reduce its carbon footprint 10 percent by 2012 via energy-efficiency efforts and use of renewable energy, and it will become carbon-neutral even sooner, in 2010, by buying emission offsets from projects such as wind farms in India." &nbsp;</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How News Corp. will become carbon neutral<p>There's more info on this in the <a href="http://grist.org/news/maindish/2007/05/09/murdoch/" rel="nofollow">article we ran last week: "The company will reduce its carbon footprint 10 percent by 2012 via energy-efficiency efforts and use of renewable energy, and it will become carbon-neutral even sooner, in 2010, by buying emission offsets from projects such as wind farms in India." &nbsp;</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 08:01:10 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rupert Murdock Is  A Sure Sign!</strong></p><p></p><p>
That "climate change" jumped the shark.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rupert Murdock Is  A Sure Sign!</strong></p><p></p><p>
That "climate change" jumped the shark.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by bralessliving</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 08:01:50 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sometimes business people lie</strong></p><p>GreyFlcn,</p><p>
"This past month, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, a regional business trade association group, unveiled a 12-point campaign dubbed "Clean and Green" that takes a variety of business issues and frames them in a way it hopes will help members reduce their environmental footprint while at the same time making them more profitable."</p><p>
From the link of your press release or article, some people view public relations and journalism as the same thing. That's not me judging, simply saying. </p><p>
I could be wrong, I have been before. In my world plans dubbed with snappy titles that rhyme, put out by business people have in general been slightly not true or tend to exaggerate a truth that they want people who purchase their items to believe. </p><p>
I of course could be living in a different reality from you. </p><p>
I mean having some contest with rhmying titles and encouraging people not use air when a package is two ounces is pretty good. </p><p>
That will do alot. You know my local Catholic primary school pretty much does the same thing on a budget of about 20,000 a year. Possibly MSNBC will to a write up on Our Mother of Good Counsel's third grade class :D</p><p>
Let me go out and start a contest right now, so I can go out save the planet.</p><p>
Lo</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sometimes business people lie</strong></p><p>GreyFlcn,</p><p>
"This past month, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, a regional business trade association group, unveiled a 12-point campaign dubbed "Clean and Green" that takes a variety of business issues and frames them in a way it hopes will help members reduce their environmental footprint while at the same time making them more profitable."</p><p>
From the link of your press release or article, some people view public relations and journalism as the same thing. That's not me judging, simply saying. </p><p>
I could be wrong, I have been before. In my world plans dubbed with snappy titles that rhyme, put out by business people have in general been slightly not true or tend to exaggerate a truth that they want people who purchase their items to believe. </p><p>
I of course could be living in a different reality from you. </p><p>
I mean having some contest with rhmying titles and encouraging people not use air when a package is two ounces is pretty good. </p><p>
That will do alot. You know my local Catholic primary school pretty much does the same thing on a budget of about 20,000 a year. Possibly MSNBC will to a write up on Our Mother of Good Counsel's third grade class :D</p><p>
Let me go out and start a contest right now, so I can go out save the planet.</p><p>
Lo</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by Green Lorraine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:43:49 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rupert Murdoch's 180 degree turnaround</strong></p><p>For many years I have considered Murdoch to be the most powerful human on the planet. &nbsp;Regardless of why, his turnaround and support is crucial if global warming is to be successfully slowed and halted before it becomes irreversible.</p><p>
His interview by Amanda is uplifting - his answers appear to be genuine. &nbsp;My grandchildren may have a future after all.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rupert Murdoch's 180 degree turnaround</strong></p><p>For many years I have considered Murdoch to be the most powerful human on the planet. &nbsp;Regardless of why, his turnaround and support is crucial if global warming is to be successfully slowed and halted before it becomes irreversible.</p><p>
His interview by Amanda is uplifting - his answers appear to be genuine. &nbsp;My grandchildren may have a future after all.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by A Siegel</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:23:28 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>There are many factors</strong></p><p>at play here ...</p><p>


 Son<br>
 proven business value (energy cost savings)<br>
 Advertiser interest<br>
 viewer interests</p><p>


Interesting mix that, I believe, might drive real change. &nbsp;</p><p>
Wal-Mart ... News Corporation ...</p><p>
What next, Exxon-Green?</br></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>There are many factors</strong></p><p>at play here ...</p><p>


 Son<br>
 proven business value (energy cost savings)<br>
 Advertiser interest<br>
 viewer interests</p><p>


Interesting mix that, I believe, might drive real change. &nbsp;</p><p>
Wal-Mart ... News Corporation ...</p><p>
What next, Exxon-Green?</br></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by Whiskerfish</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:44:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Murdoch has only ever...</strong></p><p>...been in it for the money. We can agree that it's a good thing in this case, but for heaven's sake don't start thinking that he's suddenly all nice 'n moral.</p><p>
Anyone who knows anything about how he has run his media empire, crushing journalist's unions etc. and how he operates in the British political setup will agree. He's getting behind climate change because he realises that his younger audience simply doesn't believe the denialist line anymore. Without 'credible' content to lure viewers in, he can't sell advertising, which is where he makes his cash.</p><p>
Look for a bait-n-switch here, folks. This is pre-game strategy from Mr Murdoch, I fear.</p><p>
Whiskerfish</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Murdoch has only ever...</strong></p><p>...been in it for the money. We can agree that it's a good thing in this case, but for heaven's sake don't start thinking that he's suddenly all nice 'n moral.</p><p>
Anyone who knows anything about how he has run his media empire, crushing journalist's unions etc. and how he operates in the British political setup will agree. He's getting behind climate change because he realises that his younger audience simply doesn't believe the denialist line anymore. Without 'credible' content to lure viewers in, he can't sell advertising, which is where he makes his cash.</p><p>
Look for a bait-n-switch here, folks. This is pre-game strategy from Mr Murdoch, I fear.</p><p>
Whiskerfish</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by JerryPBO</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:33:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Murdoch Green?</strong></p><p>"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" (Edward Abbey)-- also of capitalism. Capitalism cannot ever be sustainable, any capitalist who tries will lose in the marketplace. Carbon offsets are a fraud, and also unsustainable, since Murdoch would love it if eventually everyone in India could spend more money than they now make on Fox and its advertisers. Its about energy -- all of these so-called green initiatives, from silicon valley to fox news use more, not less energy, even if it is temporarily sourced to a somewhat lesser source of ghg.</p><p>
When will Murdoch simply buy out Grist so we can get more fair and balanced fantasy?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Murdoch Green?</strong></p><p>"Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" (Edward Abbey)-- also of capitalism. Capitalism cannot ever be sustainable, any capitalist who tries will lose in the marketplace. Carbon offsets are a fraud, and also unsustainable, since Murdoch would love it if eventually everyone in India could spend more money than they now make on Fox and its advertisers. Its about energy -- all of these so-called green initiatives, from silicon valley to fox news use more, not less energy, even if it is temporarily sourced to a somewhat lesser source of ghg.</p><p>
When will Murdoch simply buy out Grist so we can get more fair and balanced fantasy?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #14 by emigre</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:22:35 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/murdoch1/14</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>too little, too late</strong></p><p>sorry, Mr Murdoch and the rest of the so called "green capitalists".</p><p>
The time to do something about climate change was when scientists - who actually know something about it - started saying it was a potentially devastating threat. </p><p>
That was over 20 years ago. What were you doing then? Making as much money as possible while strenuously denying the need to act.</p><p>
Now we know it's a real, and absolutely devastating, threat, and you and the other capitalists have absolutely forfeited any right to be considered "leaders" against climate change. That must go to the people who were actually doing something about it 20 years ago, when it mattered.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>too little, too late</strong></p><p>sorry, Mr Murdoch and the rest of the so called "green capitalists".</p><p>
The time to do something about climate change was when scientists - who actually know something about it - started saying it was a potentially devastating threat. </p><p>
That was over 20 years ago. What were you doing then? Making as much money as possible while strenuously denying the need to act.</p><p>
Now we know it's a real, and absolutely devastating, threat, and you and the other capitalists have absolutely forfeited any right to be considered "leaders" against climate change. That must go to the people who were actually doing something about it 20 years ago, when it mattered.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>