<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Lots of stuff going on in D.C.]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by sunflower http://www.grist.org/article/more-significant-energy-developments-in-dc-today/ Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:02:46 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/more-significant-energy-developments-in-dc-today/1 It is a start, I had hoped for more.

Energy legislation supports business interests galore, scant science, demonstrates lack of leadership on the big picture, fragments of progress and not.

The security issue of global warming is a big epiphany on the right, adds legitimacy to government action that goes beyond business interests.

No liquid coal is most excellent.

]]> It is a start, I had hoped for more.

Energy legislation supports business interests galore, scant science, demonstrates lack of leadership on the big picture, fragments of progress and not.

The security issue of global warming is a big epiphany on the right, adds legitimacy to government action that goes beyond business interests.

No liquid coal is most excellent.

]]> Comment #2 by Tod http://www.grist.org/article/more-significant-energy-developments-in-dc-today/ Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:28:43 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/more-significant-energy-developments-in-dc-today/2 Significant?

It sure is! THis kind of legislation is terrifically significant in that it signifies we are NOWHERE NEAR adopting significant legislation - the kind that will reduce by 90% in thirty years.

Vote for a Democrat and you vote against the environment.

Vote for a Republican and you vote against the environment.

It's irresponsible as hell for Grist to not hold our elected officials to task. Not to DEMAND more from all of them. In the end, Grist will endorse the Democrat candidate, IRRESPECTIVE of his or her environmental stance.

And you call yourselves 'concerned.'

Show some dedication to the cause, for fuck's sake.

]]> Significant?

It sure is! THis kind of legislation is terrifically significant in that it signifies we are NOWHERE NEAR adopting significant legislation - the kind that will reduce by 90% in thirty years.

Vote for a Democrat and you vote against the environment.

Vote for a Republican and you vote against the environment.

It's irresponsible as hell for Grist to not hold our elected officials to task. Not to DEMAND more from all of them. In the end, Grist will endorse the Democrat candidate, IRRESPECTIVE of his or her environmental stance.

And you call yourselves 'concerned.'

Show some dedication to the cause, for fuck's sake.

]]>